is this an issue ?
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
From: Bill Johnson mellonb...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: disclosing business information on the internet
In our shop, we can't even use our work email address
Sarbanes Oxley and HIPAA are big security driving entities.
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2011 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: disclosing business information on the internet
I see several folks talking about the risk in social engineering, what
In 1311897956.32913.yahoomailclas...@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com, on
07/28/2011
at 05:05 PM, Cris Hernandez #9 hernandez...@yahoo.com said:
well, I use my personal email address and not my work email (I
seriously don't understand how anyone can deal with 50-100 blog
emails at work daily),
In 4e315430.6f0f.008...@efirstbank.com, on 07/28/2011
at 12:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com said:
Are these concerns justified or just paranoia?
Yes. It sounds paranoid, but there is at least a theoretical
possibility of social engineering by giving you as a reference
...@live.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thu, July 28, 2011 3:48:18 PM
Subject: Re: disclosing business information on the internet
Frank,
From your website
FirstBank has a full-time software developer position available for a .NET
software developer. Responsibilities include analysis
otherwise.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 07/28/2011 02:26 PM
Subject:disclosing business information
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Conway
From a security standpoint, the less you expose to the outside world,
the
better. Join a few security newsgroups / mailing lists, and see what
(justified) paranoia REALLY looks like.
[ snip ]
, the
better.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steven F. Conway, CISSP
LA Systems
z/OS Systems Support
Phone: 703.295.1926
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
From: Ken Hume IBM kph...@live.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 07/28/2011 03:50 PM
Subject:Re: disclosing business information on the internet
...@ao.uscourts.gov
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 07/28/2011 04:28 PM
Subject:Re: disclosing business information on the internet
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
I like posting this information because I've received
Of
Steve Conway
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] disclosing business information on the internet
Ken makes an excellent point. In my opinion, this still falls into the
category of I don't need perfect security, just better security than my
neighbors
: disclosing business information on the internet
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Conway
From a security standpoint, the less you expose to the outside world,
the
better
rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) writes:
My two cents' worth: that auditor needs to find a more challenging
shop. He's nit-picking on trivia and showing just how paranoid he
really is. Too much time on his hands.
one of the biggest challenges when we started doing the (internal)
online
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
Recently, I worked at a shop where our VP told us we must have all
that info in our signature block -- quite the opposite!
a group of us were the first to have business cards made up with our
internal newtwork email address (as well as arpanet email
steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov (Steve Conway) writes:
From a security standpoint, the less you expose to the outside world, the
better. Join a few security newsgroups / mailing lists, and see what
(justified) paranoia REALLY looks like.
we were tangentially involved with the cal. state data
...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
From: Steve Conway steve_con...@ao.uscourts.gov
Subject: Re: disclosing business information on the internet
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Friday, July 29, 2011, 9:07 AM
Ken makes an excellent point.
In my opinion, this still falls into the
category of I don't
of 3390's.
At some point in time I did have a tie line directory and found some other long
lost IBM friends.
Ed
From: Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: disclosing business information
two more thoughts from the mainframe security guy's point of view...
1) word is out that the mvs mainframe has never been hacked and no mainframe
security guy wants to be the first to have their system compromised. strong
motivation to keep the troops in line and not buy into any notions of
Here's something that I think may be of general interest.
Our information security officer sent the following to my manager: The
content Frank is positing does not appear to be specific to our environment.
However, I am concern by the fact he posts his position, where he works, and
phone
Frank,
It is not necessarily paranoia. Some businesses prefer a tighter control
over content than others. Many years ago I worked for a bank. We had a
wonder USS10 Sign on screen (hand written 3270 Program). Then one day on
60-Minutes there was a segment on a business that got hacked. They
On 7/28/2011 12:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Here's something that I think may be of general interest.
Our information security officer sent the following to my manager:
The content Frank is positing does not appear to be specific to our
environment. However, I am concern by the fact he posts
: Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: disclosing business information on the internet
Here's something that I think may be of general interest.
Our information security officer sent the following to my manager: The
content Frank is positing does not appear to be specific
1) paranoia. I would ask what specific security exposure is he trying to
obfuscate/mitigate?
His concern appears to center around social engineering?
He defeats his own argument by The content Frank is positing does not
appear to be specific to our environment... This statement seems (to
me)
in the context of ibm-main and
similar lists / listsrvs.
My $0.02
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: disclosing business information
In our shop, we can't even use our work email address to subscribe to the
listserv, emails from it are blocked.
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:20 PM
Subject: disclosing business
attention to yourself and your company.
Just ask yourself, do you want to draw that kind of attention to yourself?
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:20 PM
Subject: disclosing business
Steve Comstock wrote:
On 7/28/2011 12:47 PM, Hal Merritt wrote:
IMNSHO, the risk is real. There are some reports that very
carefully crafted personalized attacks are growing in number
and are enjoying some success.
H. Maybe so. Can you give an example of what personalized
attack would be?
Frank,
From your website
FirstBank has a full-time software developer position available for a
.NET software developer. Responsibilities include analysis, design,
coding, and testing of new multi-tier applications as well as enhancing
existing applications in a team environment.
-snip
Here's something that I think may be of general interest.
Our information security officer sent the following to my manager: The
content Frank is positing does not appear to be specific to our
environment. However, I am
I like posting this information because I've received useful contacts and
information based on it.
I'm curious what policies other businesses
have.
Recently, I worked at a shop where our VP told us we must have all that info in
our signature block -- quite the opposite!
-
Ted MacNEIL
On 7/28/2011 2:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Our information security officer sent the following to my
manager: The content Frank is positing does not appear to
be specific to our environment. However, I am concern by the
fact he posts his position, where he works, and phone number.
This
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:26:42 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I like posting this information because I've received useful contacts and
information based on it.
I'm curious what policies other businesses
have.
Recently, I worked at a shop where our VP told us we must have all that
...
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
Subject: disclosing business information on the internet
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 2:20 PM
Here's something that I think may be
of general
32 matches
Mail list logo
