On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:18:42 -0400, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he's still on 1.7, isn't he? I don't think TN3270 was required to
be split out until 1.8, was it? Or was it 1.7?
Jon
Sorry, my mistake. For some reason I started thinking this was a 1.9 migration
issue.
Mark
--
Mark
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some feedback for some problems were having
with the operating system either locking up (ipl locked up) or slowing down to
a crawl for a period of around 30 minutes.
There are always changes going in but the most recent and suspect is that
1.9 tolerations ptfs
Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Poster: Gilbert Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: z/OS 1.7 with toleration PTFs for 1.9
---
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some feedback for some problems were
having
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:08:49 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some feedback for some problems were having
with the operating system either locking up (ipl locked up) or slowing down to
a crawl for a period of around 30 minutes.
There are always
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:13:31 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
Good point. The OP did say the system was locking up or slowing down,
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:20:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:13:31 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:46:23 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:20:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:56:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additional info :
The VTAM/TCPIP/TSO are all running at the SYSSTC level. The TSO stc
does
not come down but only the users are kicked off.
What about TN3270?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect -
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:24:44 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:56:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additional info :
The VTAM/TCPIP/TSO are all running at the SYSSTC level. The TSO stc
does
not come down but only the users are kicked off.
But he's still on 1.7, isn't he? I don't think TN3270 was required to
be split out until 1.8, was it? Or was it 1.7?
Jon
snip
I don't know what you are calling it, but you must be if you are using
TN3270. It is required as of z/OS 1.9. If it is falling into some
low
priority service
--
That is correct. We are still on z/OS 1.7 with the 1.9 toleration PTFs applied
so that was my understanding as well.
Is there something we are missing?
Gil.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
I would go looking into the network side of the house. Since it appears to
be happening at a certain time, for a certain duration, that points to the
network.
And the TN3270 server is not required at 1.8. I'll find out soon on 1.9.
And yes, I know
MainframeGuilty until proven
are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.7 with toleration PTFs for 1.9
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:24:44 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:27:51 -0500, Matthew Stitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would go looking into the network side of the house. Since it appears to
be happening at a certain time, for a certain duration, that points to the
network.
And the TN3270 server is not required at 1.8. I'll find out
14 matches
Mail list logo
