On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:47:51 -0400, Bruce Black
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> FATS/FATAR is your answer. Bruce can elaborate on FATS/FATAR. He is
the expert.
>Thanks, Willie.
>
>Yes, either our FATAR tape utility or our FATSCOPY tape utility can do
>the job. See the web site below for deta
FATS/FATAR is your answer. Bruce can elaborate on FATS/FATAR. He is the
expert.
Thanks, Willie.
Yes, either our FATAR tape utility or our FATSCOPY tape utility can do
the job. See the web site below for details. We offer free 30-day
trials. Even if this is a one time job, get a trial an
Hello Mark,
Already mentoined are the tape copy utilities, whose source can be found on
File 229 at www.cbttape.org
The programs are also found in the load library at File 35.
//* 229 SOURCE COPYFILE - copies SL tape fls * FILE 035
//* 229 SOURCE
TECTED]
Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:55:59 -0400, Gregory, Gary G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are you wanting to make a one-for-one copy of the tapes? If so, I can
>give you an example using DITTO (assuming you want to use DITTO).
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:27:06 +0100, Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On 4/13/07, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:46:12 -0400, Jousma, David
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> YES, I have IBM's File Manager, but I don't think I've ever used it
>> bef
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:43:32 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark H. Young
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:55:59 -0400, Gregory, Gary G wrote:
>>
>> >Are you wanting to make a one-for-one copy of the tape
ginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
YES, I have IBM's File Manager, but I don't think I've
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
>
> Probably more accura
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark H. Young
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:55:59 -0400, Gregory, Gary G wrote:
>
> >Are you wanting to make a one-for-one copy of the tapes? If
> so, I can
> >give you an example using DITTO (assuming you want to use
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:55:59 -0400, Gregory, Gary G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are you wanting to make a one-for-one copy of the tapes? If so, I can
>give you an example using DITTO (assuming you want to use DITTO).
>
>Gary Garland Gregory, MS
>CA
>Senior Software Engineer
YES. Someone gave m
---
OK boys and girls.er.um..ladies and gents, et al.
Anyhowseways..I have two, count 'em two z/OS 1.7 installation
tapes from IBM. I would like to first make of copy of both before I do
anything with them. I've dumped them and they ar
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:46:12 -0400, Jousma, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I forgot to as
install tapes???
In a recent note, Shane said:
> Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
>
> Try Sams contribution to the CBT - very good.
> And excellent value for money.
>
Does it:
o Allow the user to control the VOLSER while copying all other
informatio
In a recent note, Shane said:
> Subject: Re: Tapecopy of two (2) z/OS 1.7 install tapes???
>
> Try Sams contribution to the CBT - very good.
> And excellent value for money.
>
Does it:
o Allow the user to control the VOLSER while copying all other
information from the
On 4/13/07, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:46:12 -0400, Jousma, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
YES, I have IBM's File Manager, but I don't think I've ever used it
before.
I've used DITTO a little. Can you create File Mgr JCL for batch job
submit,
or will FM t
In a message dated 4/13/2007 7:23:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SAS, etc. that would just allow me to code the two input volsers and tell it
the # of files each has? Then just give it two scratch tapes for output?
>>
SAS works fine. TAPECOPY works too, what
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:46:12 -0400, Jousma, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I forgot to ask, out of curiosity, why make copies?
>
>You don't say it, but do you have IBM's File Manager? That is really
>DITTO under the covers, and will do the copy easily.
>
>
I forgot to ask, out of curiosity, why make copies?
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:23:15 -0500, Mark H. Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
You don't say it, but do you have IBM's File Manager? That is really
DITTO under the covers, and will do the copy easily.
Dave
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
On Fri, 1
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:23:15 -0500, Mark H. Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would
>like to first make of copy of both before I do anything with them. I've dumped
>them and they are SL tapes, with lots of multi files.
>29 on volume 1 and 953 on volume 2.
>
>So I know I want to use IEBGENER
Try Sams contribution to the CBT - very good.
And excellent value for money.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
FATS/FATAR is your answer. Bruce can elaborate on FATS/FATAR. He is the
expert.
"Mark H. Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK boys and
girls.er.um..ladies and gents, et al. Anyhowseways.
.I have two, count 'em two z/OS 1.7 installation tapes from IBM. I would
like to firs
Mark H. Young wrote:
[...]
I seem to be having an Alzheimer's moment. Heck, it's Friday the 13th, right?!
So I know I want to use IEBGENER for the copy, but is there any way of NOT
having to code each dataset name of each file for each input/output JCL DD
statement?
No.
There are ways to ci
OK boys and girls.er.um..ladies and gents, et al. Anyhowseways.
.I have two, count 'em two z/OS 1.7 installation tapes from IBM. I would
like to first make of copy of both before I do anything with them. I've dumped
them and they are SL tapes, with lots of multi files.
29 o
Dennis Leong wrote:
We are getting ready to install z/os 1.7. Would 3 3390-mod9 be
sufficent
without wasting too much space (75% utilization or more is good)? One
of
the mod-9 would be sms managed for the USS HFS and I think that this may
be
overkill - perhaps a mod-3 would suffice? Thank
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 13:46 -0700, Dennis Leong wrote:
> We are getting ready to install z/os 1.7. Would 3 3390-mod9 be
> sufficent
> without wasting too much space (75% utilization or more is good)? One
> of
> the mod-9 would be sms managed for the USS HFS and I think that this may
> be
> ove
We are getting ready to install z/os 1.7. Would 3 3390-mod9 be
sufficent
without wasting too much space (75% utilization or more is good)? One
of
the mod-9 would be sms managed for the USS HFS and I think that this may
be
overkill - perhaps a mod-3 would suffice? Thank you.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:27:21 -0700, Dennis Leong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We installed z/os 17 but have not tried to ipl it. I noticed after running
>the serverpac restores the /var does not have a man directory. Should the
>man directory be there or is it now somewhere else? Thank you.
>
>
We installed z/os 17 but have not tried to ipl it. I noticed after running
the serverpac restores the /var does not have a man directory. Should the
man directory be there or is it now somewhere else? Thank you.
- enD sin
-
Dennis,
Besides reading the book that John pointed you too, I'd suggest a mod-9
is NOT overkill. Just out Root, and Java filesystems together on 1.6
are 50,612 tracks. Regarding SYSRES, we just use a single mod-27 to
house all targets, and SMPE controlled HFS(non-SMS managed) datasets,
and a mod
Dennis Leong schreef:
We are getting ready to install z/os 1.7. Would 3 3390-mod9 be
sufficent without wasting too much space (75% utilization or more is
good)? One of the mod-9 would be sms managed for the USS HFS and I
think that this may be overkill - perhaps a mod-3 would suffice?
Thank
Len
DFS = Distributed File Service
Manuals can be located at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/r7pdf/dfs.html
Regards
Robbie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
Know I know why it didn't work I have a GROUP DFS from 1989
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the ar
See Serverpac job RACFDRV, step RACFPRF2.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Rugen, Len
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.7 install - no DFS
I'm up to the first IPL of z/OS 1.7 server pack install. The ZFS task
has a STARTED class profile with USER= DFS, but I don't have that user
id. I do have ZFS that was apparently created by the install process.
I'm jumping from 1.4 to 1.7, so I may have missed the creation of DFS
along the way.
35 matches
Mail list logo
