Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ink.net...
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when
I look in my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for
several minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:41 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just learned the hard way that in our installation it is impossible to
ftp a dsnytpe=large dataset with a primary allocation 64K to IBM. The
'normal' ftp (not
Dear Barbara,
I don't know about the dsntype=large, but I
Dynamic LPA processing will typically do no better and no worse than any
other fetch that was targeted to the LNKLST. It is quite possible that the
problem is due to what the posts have indicated, namely (typically)
something now in in an extent that is not part of the LNKLST that your
space has
According to the WebSphere InfoCenter
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.ihs.doc/info/ihs/ihs/welc6miginstallihsz.html
):
quote
Note: IBM HTTP Server for z/OS, which is provided with WebSphere Application
Server, is different from the Version
Jantje,
I don't know about the dsntype=large, but I can tell you that only a few
days ago, I transferred through FTP a dataset of several megabytes from
out of the mainframe (zOS 1.6) to a Windows server without any problem and
without loosing a single byte.
I guess there must be some constraint
No one answered, so I'll try:
Your assumption about DSORG = '' is not safe.
Go, figure with allocation of PDS.
I would recommend to add DSORG parameter to your JCL.
Your SMS routines will be easier and - last but not least - you won't
have zombie datasets. I mean a dataset with DSORG=NONE. Such
Barry,
Yes, the user pays 1 bill (10 year contract) which explains his
requirements .
The qualifiers from 1 to 6 are different which adds to my woes. Some dsns
have 4 qualifers, while others have 6. The user is testing new CICS
environments and needs certains dsn to be trapped by TMM.
They would still need to change the JCL to include the directory blocks,
correct ?
-Gani
Darth Keller wrote:
I've got a dataset allocated with the following JCL:
41 //OUTLOAN DD DSN=T.PM.CWSCW02M.CWSBCWI1.DMLOAN.PRECODE1,
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG),
//
With Darren's kind permission, here is a recent
announcement that I sent to our opt-in list a
week or 10 days ago. Trying to keep any
announcements to no more than one a quarter.
--
We have updated our entire COBOL curriculum to
reflect changes in the
Although it is theoretically possible for an instance of GIMCPTS to be
down level, there are currently no such cases... excepting of course the
very unlikely case of not having GIMCPTS at all.
More specifically, if SMP/E were to implement an additional and new
compression dictionary, then it
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:35:46 -0500, Peter Relson wrote:
Alternately (and this really is the intended thing to do, not refreshing
LLA), have someone create a new LNKLST set just like the old one and
activate it and then start your application.
For example,
SETPROG LNKLST DEFINE NAME(COPY)
No directory blocks needed - this is a PS file.
It looks to me like Radoslaw's response indicating that I'll have to have
the applications add the DSORG parm to their JCl is the way I'm going to
have to go. I suspected as much but was looking for confirmation.
dd keller
They would still
Hello everybody,
I have been away for almost three weeks. (See my personal note below). So
I have not been able to provide Wiki news. Thanks for Roland who looked
after the Wiki in this time.
- We passed one hundred team members while I was gone! As great as it is -
we can do even better. There
No directory blocks needed - this is a PS file.
It looks to me like Radoslaw's response indicating that I'll have to have
the applications add the DSORG parm to their JCl is the way I'm going to
have to go. I suspected as much but was looking for confirmation.
dd keller
Darth,
You could
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:38:32 -0600, Darth Keller wrote:
I've got a dataset allocated with the following JCL:
41 //OUTLOAN DD DSN=T.PM.CWSCW02M.CWSBCWI1.DMLOAN.PRECODE1,
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG),
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=205,BLKSIZE=0),
//
For most of my dataclas's, I do assign a DSORG. But in this case where
I'm testing for the DSORG using it to assign a dataclas, it doesn't help
- kind of a cart-horse problem.
ddk
Darth,
You could add the dsorg to the dataclass(es) if you assign a dataclass
to every dataset. Any open (or jcl
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:05 -0500, Mark Pace wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
IEHLIST will tell you in a LISTVTOC.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For
We have a 3494 ATL in our BR site we use for an offsite tape repository.
The plan is for that unit to run stand alone until we bring up a
production LPAR and begin a recovery. Tapes would be rotated in and out
of the unit using printed reports from the base system.
The operators want to use
Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
--
Mark Pace
Yes, ask SMS:
D SMS,VOL(volser)
Kees.
**
For information, services
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Mark Pace wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
ISMF 2.1.1
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr
If you have QuickRef it will tell you.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 20, 2008 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SMS managed volume
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information
Darth,
You could create a new barebones dataclass and assign it to any dataset
with a null DSORG. I
have such a dataclas just to avoid gdg model datasets when creating a +1
gds.
Regards,
John
For most of my dataclas's, I do assign a DSORG. But in this case where
I'm testing for the DSORG using
We are starting to install and test V1R9. Part of the challenge will be archaic
DB2 and a lame-duck CICS. Have any of you 'been there and done that and
would be willing to share your experiences?
Thank you.
--
For IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
That example stated that $800 per CPU/hr was the cost for a machine
(undefined
Tom Marchant wrote:
It's been a long time since I've done any SMS work, but I think you can do
what you are proposing as long as you add RECORG=PS to your data class.
No ways! RECORG is for VSAM, They're discussing DSORG=PS in this thread.
RECORG={KS|ES|RR|LR} There is nothing about PS in
snip
Some of my colleagues are investigating, from an architecture
point-of-view, how best to use CICS Web services to provide customer
access to our 2-tiered CICS-DB2 application on z/OS. For each scenario
that they investigate, as much detail on resource consumption is
required. Where I am
If you have TASID, UCB under option 5 (Miscellaneous displays) would provide
that indicator.
I think even SHOWZOS (SHOWMVS) provides that information. I do not have it
installed here to ascertain this claim.
-Gani
Mark Pace wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or
Darth,
Sound like you have the cart in front of the horse to me. I used to code the
ACS to assign DSORG=PS if it was blank and did not meet any other DSORG's
criteria. This prevented the HSM orphans that Radoslaw referred to.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
John -
Actually the DCSTDFLT dataclas assigned in the code stub shown in my 1st
email is exactly that - a barebones dataclass. But in this case, I wanted
to assign a dataclass with the extended format compaction attributes. I
have several of these to chose from wanted to assign DCEXTEND
From memory, which is a dangerous thing these days, I'm fairly certain
that you can eject tapes from the d/t 3494 via the 'action' panel but I
can't remember weather you have to be in manual mode or not. In your case
that doesn't appear to be a concern though. Ejecting virtual tapes is a
We use a 3rd party product to initialize these datasets prevent the
orphans.
ddk
Darth,
Sound like you have the cart in front of the horse to me. I used to code
the
ACS to assign DSORG=PS if it was blank and did not meet any other
DSORG's
criteria. This prevented the HSM orphans that Radoslaw
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:15:41 -0800, Gerhard Adam wrote:
So, the more processors you have to split the costs across, the lower
the CPU/hr charge may be. And those charges are based on the SMF
collected times (since that is what fed the accounting system).
It is clearly ridiculous since the
FDR Report will tell you. Just ask for the VLSMSTAT field in the report.
It will display Managed if the volume is SMS managed and NONE if it is
not.
Tom Moulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Wednesday,
Which CICS release are you referring to?
i just checked all of the fixes for CICS TS 2.2 and 3.1 and did not find
any that had to be put on for z/os 1.9 although there were a number of
hyper fixes unrelated to z/os 1.9 that will be applied.
of course there are always new LE RDO groups
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:59:00 -0600, Darth Keller wrote:
John -
Actually the DCSTDFLT dataclas assigned in the code stub shown in my 1st
email is exactly that - a barebones dataclass. But in this case, I wanted
to assign a dataclass with the extended format compaction attributes. I
have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin
We are starting to install and test V1R9. Part of the
challenge will be archaic
DB2 and a lame-duck CICS. Have any of you 'been there and
done that and would be willing to share your
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SMS managed volume
Is there an easy way to tell if a DASD volume is SMS managed or not?
--
Many thanks to all who responded to my LZW query. I now have a plethora
of references available, thanks to many helpful responses both onlist
and offlist.
I can't say for sure what compression algorithm I'll use in the updated
ARCHIVER; overall performance and some of the technical details
Because the TOD clock on mainframes loses seconds over a period of time
the clock needs to be reset. Without the use of a SYSPLEX Timer what are
you doing to reset the time?
Do you reset the time on the HMC and do a POR? If so how often?
Set the time when you IPL?
Reset the local clock time
Tom -
Actually I only wanted to assign DCEXTEND for a PS file, but not a PO. The
manual reference was actually what I needed to find as I couldn't remember
which files could actually fall into SMS with a blank DSORG.
I'm going to handle it by having the applications add the DSORG to their
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:43:10 -0600, Darth Keller wrote:
Actually I only wanted to assign DCEXTEND for a PS file, but not a PO. The
manual reference was actually what I needed to find as I couldn't remember
which files could actually fall into SMS with a blank DSORG.
I'm going to handle it by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: 3494 ATL Manual Functions
We have a 3494 ATL in our BR site we use for an offsite tape
Use not PO. It will be PO if it's a library
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darth Keller
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A Blank DSORG
Tom -
Actually I only wanted to
Tom -
I hadn't thought about using DSNTYPE. If it gets set when you request
directory blocks in the allocation, I could see where I could use it.
Otherwise
I don't see anything else in the values for test cases that would help me
determine a PS from a PO. The one thing this has pointed
If we see that the time is far enough off we will reset the local clock
time, but we have only been setting the time when Daylight/Standard time
changes.
Because the TOD clock on mainframes loses seconds over a period of time
the clock needs to be reset. Without the use of a SYSPLEX Timer what
Mark,
There were lots of good answers to your question. I'll add MXI to the
list of tools.
But for my money, Kees reply was not only the first; it is the easiest
for one volume. What I did not like, however, is that the error message
text of CBR1064I that accompanies the D SMS command does
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:35:46 -0500, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dynamic LPA processing will typically do no better and no worse than any
other fetch that was targeted to the LNKLST. It is quite possible that the
problem is due to what the posts have indicated, namely (typically)
Darth,
Actually I only wanted to assign DCEXTEND for a PS file, but not a PO.
The
manual reference was actually what I needed to find as I couldn't
remember
which files could actually fall into SMS with a blank DSORG.
Are your users coding directory blocks in their space parameter? DSORG
John -
No directory blocks in this case. They want a PS file but never coded the
DSORG.
I was going to have them update their JCL with the DSORG parameter, but
I'm also thinking I can handle it within SMS with a separate filterlist of
specific names in addition to the filterlist which uses
If all other things are equal, the cost per CPU second for a machine with two
processors is half the cost per CPU second of a machine with one processor.
Voodoo mathematics.
If I start a second processor, I have to at least pay for the hardware upgrade
and increased s/w costs.
So, I don't
If you're running IBM's http Server (maybe on a sandbox?), view mainframe
datasets from your web browser (if the MVSDS service is enabled). You could
then print locally.
It could be secure (basic SAF or LDAP) at the server level (UserId in the
config) or just for the MVSDS service (via
Hello listers -
Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with replacing the CA's TPX
with a different session manager?
Thank you.
Todd Blandford
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Using the coprocessor is NOT exactly the same as running the preprocessor
and then the compiler. As far as I know, there have been NO reports of
different run-time results from the two, but there are things that using
the coprocessor can do that the preprocessor can't (see the Programming
Guide
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
If all other things are equal, the cost per CPU second for a machine
with two
If you are running the CICS Itegrated translator You should be fine. I ran
it in a
previous installation and had no problems.
Your Application developers may not like it since it generates different
source code
that a CICS program compiled with the Translator.
It was my application staff that
Candle Supersession (or whatever IBM has renamed it to now) was pretty
good.
There is also another product (SWITCH?) the does the same.
snip
Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with replacing the CA's TPX
with a different session manager?
/snip
We use (ug!) Windows and a suitable (supports TLS/SSL) TN3270 emulator.
Works great, users love it, minimal cost, minimal user training. The
only minuses are users having to log on many times and users closing
windows without logging off.
Modern users are accustomed to having any number of
Darth,
Have you given any thought to other compound filter list tests (jobname,
ddname, program, etc.) that could help assign your data class without
JCL changes?
Bob
-
Robert B. Richards(Bob)
US Office of Personnel
Does anyone have any idea how to circumvent the problem with connecting the
current coupling links from a z900 STI to the new z10 infiniBand link? OR
have an idea how to integrate the two? The problem is coupling a z900 to a
new z10.
--
Paul Meier
Mainframe PCAP
Cell: (708)717-8553
Work:
Give the product marketed by Macro4 called TUBES a try.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Todd Blandford
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Replacement for CA - TPX - Session Manager?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:33:17 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin
We are starting to install and test V1R9. Part of the
challenge will be archaic
DB2 and a lame-duck CICS. Have any of you
Since what I have said is so ridiculous, why don't you take a crack at
answering the original question? Then we can all take pot shots at what
you say, pointing out that the example you used, based on a real system,
is absolutely _ [fill in the blank].
First of all these comments weren't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
If all other things are equal, the cost per CPU second for a
machine with two processors is half the cost per CPU second
of a machine with one processor.
Voodoo mathematics.
Is that anything like
We use MacKinney's Switch and it works great for a very nominal annual cost.
Mark Crabtree
ANPAC
Manager of System Programming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(417) 887-4990 x.2767
CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are
intended solely for the addressee. This
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:41:52 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If all other things are equal, the cost per CPU second for a machine with
two processors is half the cost per CPU second of a machine with one
processor.
Voodoo mathematics.
Anything beyond our comprehension is
OK, all you guys are right. There is no way to do charge-back
accounting. All the formulae are wrong regardless of what they are.
First of all no one said you can't do chargeback, but only that the
simplistic solutions being proposed aren't accurate.
If you have a formula, I'd love to see it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/19/2008
at 06:45 AM, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Now that I don't understand. The From: is clear,
The From doesn't tell the recipient that you sent another copy to the
list.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:27:35 -0800, Gerhard Adam wrote:
First of all these comments weren't intended as a personal attack, and I
never indicated that YOU were ridiculous, but rather than the proposed
mechanism for costing CPU seconds was.
The primary reason they are ridiculous is that the
FDR Report addresses both issues to give an accurate picture and will also
allow you to place the Storage Group name in the report. I use it all the
time on my current project.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Traylor,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:04:19 -0600, Paul Meier wrote:
Does anyone have any idea how to circumvent the problem with connecting
the
current coupling links from a z900 STI to the new z10 infiniBand link? OR
have an idea how to integrate the two? The problem is coupling a z900 to a
new z10.
You
If your single-engine machine used, say, 100 MSUs, how many MSUs does the
now twin-engine machine use for the same workload?
Roughly the same.
Assuming NO capacity-priced software, how much is the increase in software
cost?
I'm not sure what your term capacity priced means, but if it means
Just what I heard.
On 2/20/08, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Meier
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Z10 coupling link
MacKinney---VTAM Switch
Depends on what you need...just a simple session manger? then this
will do it
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally
OK, all you guys are right. There is no way to do charge-back accounting. All
the formulae are wrong regardless of what they are. All these circus bureaus
have been defrauding their clients, all the publicly held companies that are
doing charge-back are somehow cooking their books.
Now, I have
G'day,
I'm on a 1.4 JES2 system (PLEX) with SDSF what I would like to do is to look
at a different system's log file from the one I'm on. I know I did this
before but can not find out how I did it again.
Thank you.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
The sender believes that this E-mail and any
So, I don't understand/agree with your statement.
Compare a z9 BC model Y01 (1 CP) to a model S02 (2 CPs). Both are about 420
MIPS. Can you buy them both for the same price? I don't know.
Okay. Now I understand.
There was a missing assumption, that the single engine processor and the two
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Moulder
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2008 6:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS managed volume
FDR Report addresses both issues to give an accurate picture
and will also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Meier
Does anyone have any idea how to circumvent the problem with
connecting the current coupling links from a z900 STI to the
new z10 infiniBand link? OR have an idea how to integrate the
two? The problem
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:21:21 -0600, Jackson, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give the product marketed by Macro4 called TUBES a try.
Which has been reincarnated now by IBM as ISM (IBM Session Manager).
Check the archives... there is an extensive list of session managers.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Herman,
Is it the SDSF 'SYSID' command you're looking for? SYSID where
is the other system in your plex.
HTH,
Paul
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:52:55 -0500, Stocker, Herman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day,
I'm on a 1.4 JES2 system (PLEX) with SDSF what I would like to do is to look
at
Herman
Do you have OPERLOG enabled (syslog into a CF structure) if so, from
within SDSF, enter set log ? and select operlog, then filter sysname
is the system's log you want to see.
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
may the 'z' be with you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi:
These were a few questions posted on another topic in CICS-L for which no
reply was received. The topic was CI/CA splits and I asked the following
questions, which were embedded in the response:
1) Two of the processes of completing a CA split is to format the new CA and
clear out
Todd Blandford wrote:
Hello listers -
Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with replacing the CA's TPX
with a different session manager?
Multiple icons on your PC desktop?
Works like a charm.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
Does anyone have any idea how to circumvent the problem with
connecting the
current coupling links from a z900 STI to the new z10
infiniBand link? OR
have an idea how to integrate the two?
Since the product hasn't been announced, yet, the only ones who would know are
those under NDA.
And, they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:21:21 -0600, Jackson, Robin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give the product marketed by Macro4 called TUBES a try.
Which has been reincarnated now by IBM as ISM (IBM Session
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Z10 coupling link
McKown, John wrote:
Has the z10 been announced? If not, then you may be in
I'm on a 1.4 JES2 system (PLEX) with SDSF what I would like to do is to look
at a different system's log file from the one I'm on.
I know I did this before but can not find out how I did it again.
Primary command:
== SYSID
Where is the JES-id for the target system.
Has been
Tom Marchant sent this earlier today:
From the Storage Administration Reference:
If you do not specify a Recorg value for data sets with a data class,
assigned
either by JCL or ACS routine, the DSORG defaults to either physical
sequential
(PS) or partitioned organization (PO).
--
Unless I
It is not recommended to use so different machines (in term of CPU speed) in
sysplex. To much overhead.
Having monitored and measured this in real world environments since 1994, I
disagree.
Define too much, and produce documentation.
The biggest issue is lock elongation if you put a sharing
John Kington wrote:
Darth,
[...]
Are your users coding directory blocks in their space parameter? DSORG
should
be set to PO if there is a value coded.
Maybe it should, but AFAIK it isn't. That's the problem. Having blank
DSORG you cannot tell whether it is PS or PO. You can check directory
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:57:28 -0600, Paul Dineen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herman,
Is it the SDSF 'SYSID' command you're looking for? SYSID where
is the other system in your plex.
To clarify: The other system can only be one in the same MAS. If your
JES is not shared, it doesn't
The problem with using multiple emulator sessions is that if you lose your
network connection to the mainframe, you also lose all your tn3270 sessions
too. By logging on to the mainframe applications though a session manager, the
session manager will hold your sessions open for you until you
Moving on, it has been demonstrated that the CF engine needs to be reasonably
close to the coupled engine speed else there is a risk of
capacity loss.
Define 'reasonably close'. Define 'a risk'.
We had 9672-C04 CFs with 9672-RXn z/900 images.
Yes, this was a few years ago.
Due to budgetting
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:19:16 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:21:21 -0600, Jackson, Robin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give the product marketed by Macro4 called TUBES a
Go to
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=tss1prs840
and select the presentation labeled S2885BB - Tool Bag - orlando.pdf
See page 5.
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
- Original Message
From: Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent:
Note the change of title from the obvious OTHER one. :-) And deliberate
abstraction on MY part. :-)
The issue is with whether the Coupling Facility is too slow relative to
the coupled z/OS images. Just to be clear: Not whether the images are on
different speed engines.
Moving on, it has been
Martin Packer wrote:
Note the change of title from the obvious OTHER one. :-) And deliberate
abstraction on MY part. :-)
The issue is with whether the Coupling Facility is too slow relative to
the coupled z/OS images. Just to be clear: Not whether the images are on
different speed engines.
Hmmm... z/OS 1.10 (on page 4) AND the z/10-EC (on page 5). Nice find,
Mark!
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:19:01 -0800, Mark T. Regan, K8MTR wrote:
Go to
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=tss1prs840
and select the presentation labeled S2885BB - Tool Bag - orlando.pdf
See page 5.
Why are you still using a session manager? A lot of green screens?
The number of green screens has nothing to do with it, as far as I'm concerned.
We use them with TN3270 sessions for one major reason -- single sign on.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
