On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:24 -0500 J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:From the description of the ALLOCATE command
:operands in TSO/E Command Reference, SA22-7782:
:When you invoke ALLOCATE to perform dsname
:dynamic allocation, an allocation environment
:already exists for your request. It
I know this has been pounded to death, but ...
Had a need for an emulator on my personal laptop, so went and got Vista
from Tom Brennan.
Couldn't get into a site requiring SSL V3. Emailed Tom, and he told me
which drop-down box I'd missed. PEBKAC.
$US30 ... damn, that's good value. Get out there
Rajeev,
I think we'll need a little more information to answer your question well.
What sort of mainframe job is it? Let's start with programming language if
you know. (Do you have the source code, or is it code somebody else
supplied?) Also, where's it running? Is it a batch job, or a CICS
Hi,
Can anyone please suggest the method to invoke the LE diagnostic and dump
facility at run time. My installation has Abend-Aid installed which by
default produces its own dump and also can be turned off at run time. But I
am looking to turn on CEEDUMP at runtime which I find more easy for
Shane,
We've used Vista for our small band of TSO users for eight years.
Prompted by your email I realised that although we'd bought a
multi-seat license back in 2000, we've paid nothing since then. So,
we've just bought a new multi-seat license to in some small way try
and ensure that Tom
The BPXWDYN function, available in REXX, allows you to concatenate a list of
ddnames.
e.g.
call bpxwdyn concat ddlist(somedd,dd1,dd2) msg(2)
would concat dd1 and dd2 to somedd.
Bill
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:24 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:34:32
I have several Open systems servers each running windows 2003. having
unique IP addresses and each running their own scripts to capture data.
This data is then being sent via ftp and stored on mainframe lpar as
GDGs. Each file being sent to the mainframe is unique and is being
stored in their
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:31:04 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Schmidt) wrote:
The z10 LSPR data is now available too.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/lspr/
Yes, and it looks like they are using a new femtofont on
the z10 page.
(Could they make it smaller still?)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Ford
All,
Where dod I find the announcement letter for z/os v1.10 ??
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2su7lf
Note that it's a preview, not the announcement letter.
-jc-
Shane/Graeme:
I agree. I purchased Tom Brennan's code a few years back and am very happy with
it and Tom has ALWAYS been extremely helpful whenever I had a question whether
it was related to his code or not. A real class act.
Bill Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:37:43 +1100 From: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Arthur T.
On 27 Feb 2008 13:34:35 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
Tom.Schmidt wrote:
The z10 LSPR data is now available too.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/lspr/
Yes, and it looks like they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Snipped
What the announcement actually says:
Snipped
So, as it says, the support planned in z/OS
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:48:14 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Snipped
What the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:05:05 -0500, Mike Liberatore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have several Open systems servers each running windows 2003. having
unique IP addresses and each running their own scripts to capture data.
This data is then being sent via ftp and stored on mainframe lpar as
GDGs.
Only one idea, user error. Over 15 years of IP access to mvs, I've
had several PFCSKS swear that they found a case where my server was
making a mistake. They have yet to win one.
You can check SMF records to see when the incorrect datasets are created
and by who. Then backtrack from there.
I'm curious about future enhancements. As I understood the letter, VSAM
datasets are for beginning (as 223GB vol. size).
IMHO we can expect in the future ext fmt PS and PDSE in the upper
area. Of course only IBMers know (and won't disclose).
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
I have a problem getting a local hosts table being used .
I generated a local host table with the MAKESITE command.
It generated datasets TCPIP.HOSTS.INFO datasets.
Settings in TCPDATA (member):
DATASETPREFIX=TCPIP
LOOKUP DNS LOCAL
When in TSO I try to PING a hostname only known in the
Well I've just seen my first one (actually 2) as they were being delivered.
Don't look much different to the previous versions. Personally I'm waiting
for the plethora of postings asking if OS/390 can run on it...
Seb.
--
For
Yes. Thanks for pointing that out as it is supported by the OS. The only
problem might be if joe programmer doesn't have a OMVS segment and
the default segment isn't defined.But I really don't know if BPXWDYN
requires it. Maybe Paul G. knows or someone else.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:54:00 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of our DASD subsystems are EMCs, I want to know if it's possible to
implement PAV on DASD made by EMC? Can it be defined as Control UNIT=2105?
Currently, it is defined as CONTROL UNIT=3990 and IODEVICE UNIT=3390 in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Liberatore
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 6:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: FTP question
I have several Open systems servers each running windows 2003. having
unique
I would just add for completeness that HYPERPAV support was announced this
year as well.
Tom Moulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:05:46 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
Yes. Thanks for pointing that out as it is supported by the OS. The only
problem might be if joe programmer doesn't have a OMVS segment and
the default segment isn't defined.But I really don't know if BPXWDYN
requires it. Maybe Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.10 announcement -DASD size
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.10 announcement -DASD size
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:51:57 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353
In our project we have a requirement like: We need to refer a table in
the
Teradata database (running in UNIX environment) from our mainframe job
directly.
Please let me if you are aware of any tool or utility that will help to
access the
Teradata tables from the mainframe job?
Viaserv's
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:24 -0500, J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the description of the ALLOCATE command
operands in TSO/E Command Reference, SA22-7782:
When you invoke ALLOCATE to perform dsname
dynamic allocation, an allocation environment
already exists for your request. It consists
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:50:57 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:05:46 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
But I really don't know if BPXWDYN
requires it. Maybe Paul G. knows or someone else.
Doesn't require OMVS (AFAIK; I can't test this);
snip
After thinking
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/27/2008
at 11:53 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
My chief objection to MVS, et. al., is its unnecessary complexity. I now
have three examples in VIO alone. VIO should emulate real DASD using
paging I/O.
Unfortunately, that's more or less what it does,
I have still been unable to test this. In my current
environment I'm unable to create non-cataloged
datasets. It's probably an SMS thing.
The only thing I would have done differently to your
test, Mark, would have been to remove the ddname
(@NOTCAT) from the first ALLOC command. I'm
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:55:38 -0500, J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have still been unable to test this. In my current
environment I'm unable to create non-cataloged
datasets. It's probably an SMS thing.
It is. If you don't know the magic STORCLAS that will keep
it from getting SMS
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:33:01 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:31:04 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Schmidt) wrote:
The z10 LSPR data is now available too.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/lspr/
Yes, and it looks like they are using a new femtofont
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:55:38 -0500, J R wrote:
I have still been unable to test this. In my current
environment I'm unable to create non-cataloged
datasets. It's probably an SMS thing.
???
Are even your temporary data sets catalogued, or are you not
allowed to create temporary data sets?
I am reading, but have no real experience. I have a single member
sysplex right now. I need to split it into two z/OS images, in a basic
sysplex. Due to stupidity on my part, I named the sysplex the same as
the sysname. I would now like to change the name of the sysplex to
something like PROD1. I
Never had to do this myself, but:
Why not create the second image in the new sysplex and populate your
CDS's in the new sysplex.
Migrate work to the second image in the new sysplex and then put the
current image into the new sysplex with an IPL.
I would expect this to be a minimal outage ( 30
Not, nice but IMHO feasible: leave the names unchanged. Create second
system with new name. You will have SYSPROD and SYSPRO2 belongind to
sysplex SYSPROD.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 1:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a __simple__ way to change the name of
a SYSPLEX?
Never had to do this myself,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
02/26/2008
at 12:55 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd hate to do word processing on z/OS
Why? And if you want WYSIWYG, you can get it as easily under Linux as
under windoze.
(remember DW/370?
Yes. I also remember DCF, BookMaster and BookManager BUILD.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/27/2008
at 03:29 PM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just tried that and it didn't work for me .
What happens if the existing allocation is marked not in use?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Radoslaw,
The way I read this is that in z/OS 1.10, support will be limited to only
the specified dataset types. As for what may happen in the future, nothing
is guaranteed, however, at the same time, nothing has been publicly ruled
out.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:47:41 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am reading, but have no real experience. I have a single member
sysplex right now. I need to split it into two z/OS images, in a basic
sysplex. Due to stupidity on my part, I named the sysplex the same as
the sysname. I
I think (but am not certain) that what you want is the information at:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=431context=SSTLTFdc=DB520dc=D
B560uid=swg21265671loc=en_UScs=UTF-8lang=enrss=ct431other
In particular, specify
//ABNLIGNR DD DUMMY
you may also want to look at:
My first stop would be to better understand the upload (sever to MF)
process. From your description, the MF is just a repository. It has no
idea what is in the files.
In other words, server 'a' is FTP'ing to the MF with instructions to
stow data in X.Y.Z(+1).
I would ask why server 'a' is
When you have a VSAM KSDS opened for output by two address spaces on the
same image, and one of the address spaces writes enough records to force the
adding of an additional volume, when the VERIFY ACTION=REFRESH is done by
the second address space, then the second address space will see the
Sorry to post and run, but here's the scoop so that you have it.
Just a reminder that the first 2008 Live Virtual Class is on
set for Monday, March 3rd at 11:00 AM ET.
There is no charge to participate in this technical education session.
Date: Monday, March 3, 2008
Time: 11:00 AM ET / 4:00
I have already sent this information to comp.lang.cobol and to the SHARE
LNGC project, but I thought there MIGHT be some within IBM-MAIN who would
also be interested (and interested enough to actually do something about
this).
William M. Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
I'm a member, but I wasn't aware of the availability. I still can't find it
on the D-Works web site. Can you point me to it?
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I answered you last time, but maybe you missed it. You have to download the
file from the CBT UPDATES page, not the regular CBT tape page because they
are different. The UPDATES page contains the fixes that you need. If you
have any problems, please contact me offline and I'll help you get the
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:26:28 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We did a DR last week (and I immediately go sick the day after ---
coincidence? You decide!). Anyway, one problem that we had was that we
could only get 8 of the 16 ATL drives to become allocated. Note that all
16 drives
Hi John,
One other thing I assume you've ruled out is the possibility that some drives
were stolen by another system via autoswitching. I've seen that happen
when only a subset of drives is defined as auto-switchable.
Regards,
Mike Baldwin
Cartagena Software Ltd.
www.cartagena.com
Brian Westerman wrote:
I'm a member, but I wasn't aware of the availability. I still can't find it
on the D-Works web site. Can you point me to it?
You need a CDA first. Being a D-Works member doesn't count.
Brian
Henry
In an earlier post I said something like the System z10s are apparently
shipping.
I've just found out I can strike the word apparently. They're shipping.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in
52 matches
Mail list logo
