On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:07:55 -0600, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Assembled..new USSTAB...using same name as before..
tried loading new via modify opt=load and also opt=assoc
these are tn3270 terminals in tcpip
do I need to issue obey ... and if I do---will it knock-off already
Anthony,
I read with interest your post because we have your same environment (3 z/OS
1.7 LPARs in a
basic sysplex) and the performance of GRS ring is not the best. Specifically, I
see XCF delays using
RMF PM, the average value is about 7-8% on the PROD lpar, on the others it goes
over 20 %.
After start Netview new sesion:
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10 - DSI205I 000 TIMER ELEMENTS PURGED OP = 'AUTO1'
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10 - DSI034I COMMAND SCHEDULED BY AT/EVERY/AFTER COMMAND - 'IDLEOFF 480 469'
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10 - DSI201I TIMER REQUEST SCHEDULED FOR
Hi!
Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource
about IBM's Debug Tool ?
I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some
diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
TIA
Thomas
_
Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling
Sorry but My last mail was liittle unreadable.
after start Netview new sesion:
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10 - DSI205I 000 TIMER ELEMENTS PURGED OP =
'AUTO1'
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10 - DSI034I COMMAND SCHEDULED BY AT/EVERY/AFTER
COMMAND - 'IDLEOFF 480 469'
AUTO1CNM0217:43:10
Always? Sometimes not? If the latter, is there a sure-fire way to test for
running in SRB mode?
TIA,
Jerry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Hi!
You can try the address;
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
for
IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools Compilers
information centerCheers
Timur Alpaslan
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debug Tool know how...
To:
Asked and answered. Thanks Tom and Binyamin.
Jerry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and
the User Guide... ..and I have read them both :((
(Or at least big parts of them.)
Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to
the manuals (at points where I have found info about)
- plus that there is a lot that is not
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:55:54 -0600 Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Always? Sometimes not? If the latter, is there a sure-fire way to test for
:running in SRB mode?
Always.
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar
Hi!
There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 called IBM Application
Development and Problem Determination Tools V7 for System z which can be
rather handy to have a look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to
download from IBM.
Cheers
Timur
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008
Yes, I have looked into it.
But my problems is like: The manual says You can
use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of
names of current items, e g AT CHANGE %CU:VARIABLE-NAME ,
etc. But I get syntax error for that and so on.
I also get other errors regarding qualification of
variables.
Does anyone still have laying around somewhere the DATA1 print product,
originally announced by IBM in 1984, and I think still available from IBM
marketing? I am specifically looking for the FONT *d224*; if that's in your
FONTLIB, and what the complete member name is?
THANX and TTFN,
Mark
Sorry!
I'm not a direct user of the product.
I'll suggest you contact IBM SW Support such tah they can help you with details.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:09:53 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Yes, I have looked into it.
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:03:11 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never seen any SDSF data in ISPF Help. SDSF does have help panels.
They are not bad as reference but it is difficult to find anything if
you don't already know the exact command. For example, is FINDLIM a
command
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 06:45:29 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest manual I was able to find was SA22-7670-09 (Sept 06).
Walt,
I really wouldn't want to read up on a conversion from SDSF security
(yes, we're still using *that*) to RACF via panels!
Regards, Barbara Nitz
--
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have looked into it.
But my problems is like: The manual says You can
use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of
names of current items, e g AT CHANGE %CU:VARIABLE-NAME ,
etc. But I get syntax error for that
Hello Everyone,
In IPCS, option 2 (ANALYSIS), option 6 (COMPONENT), Select XESDATA
(bottom of the screen). On the next screen, select SUMMARY and FACILITY
and start the XESDATA subcommand.
Page through the output and you'll see something like this:
SUMMARY OF COUPLING
thanks to all for assistance doing the obey worked and did not knock
anyone off systemm...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged
The DEST field in the Ooutput display...
Is there a way to alter the Length of the DEST field to allow the operator
to enter a Node number as well as the (8) character DESTid..
or
is this handled through the NODE field.?.
and if so..
how can the field be setup to be able to enter--alter field..
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 06:45:29 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walt,
I really wouldn't want to read up on a conversion from SDSF security
(yes, we're still using *that*) to RACF via panels!
True, but a -user- does not convert from SDSF security to RACF. The system
programmer does
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:38:59 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:03:11 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... If SDSF Help had an index and
a tutorial like ISPF, I think it would be more useful.
The SDSF Help under ISPF -does- have an Index. As noted on the Help
A customer currently uses RMF to provide DA information in SDSF; with sysplex
scope.
They are now joing another sysplex which will have up to 13 members, and SDSF
DA command is performing badly due to slow response from other systems.
Is there some way to retain sysplex DA capability while
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have looked into it.
But my problems is like: The manual says You can
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:26:25 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, whenever I search for a z/Series PoOP online in HTML/Book format
as opposed to PDF, I conclude that some department within IBM thinks
of DCF only in the past tense. Has PoOP authoring abandoned DCF for
a competing
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:48:22 -0600, Anthony Fletcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a GRS environment using XCF (ie not using a CF) with three LPARS
connected. We had changed the RESMIL value to OFF to try and improve
responsiveness. That worked, but the XCFAS address space CPU consumption
went
Hi,
We had a production job that was canceled after 8 hours in the machine,
during month end processing.
Here is what the job was doing :
DUMP DATASET(INCLUDE(HW*.**)
BY((DSORG NE VSAM))
You can use the IXCQUERY macro
There is a whole book in z/OS bookshelf dedicated to the sysplex services that
you can call.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:56:30 -0600, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DEST field in the Ooutput display...
Is there a way to alter the Length of the DEST field to allow the operator
to enter a Node number as well as the (8) character DESTid..
or
is this handled through the NODE field.?.
and
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:55:03 +0100, Beesley, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A customer currently uses RMF to provide DA information in SDSF; with
sysplex scope.
They are now joing another sysplex which will have up to 13 members, and
SDSF DA command is performing badly due to slow response from
Mark
What about a perminate change?? to allow it..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:41:07 -0600, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark
What about a perminate change?? to allow it..
To be able to change the DEST field? That would be from ISFPARMS -
(either assembled or SDSF server ISFPRMxx) or from external
security.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software
Thanks Mark, that's what I thought.
Pity the LPARs don't start with the same characters, I could have forced
SYSNAME XX* or whatever...
Paul
-Original Message-
I don't think there is. But you can restrict the use of the SYSNAME
command or force it to default to the current system in
YES!!
I'm not sure when, but at some point Omegamon stopped being part of the
solution and became THE PROBLEM.
Upgrades, be it z/OS or CICS, now split my time 50-50.
50% for the upgrade,
50% for the associated Omegamon changes.
Dennis Barrett
Systems Programmer
Laclede Gas Co.
720 Olive Street,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:51:29 +0100, Beesley, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Mark, that's what I thought.
Pity the LPARs don't start with the same characters, I could have forced
SYSNAME XX* or whatever...
Even with 13 or more systems, I don't know why sysplex DA would be
performing badly
Hello all,
1. Well SHARE is over and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I found most of the
tracks very enjoyable. There were exceptions like the SOA track but you
can read my comments about it at http://www.cicsworld.com/node/384 .
2. CICS World is alive! My friend Ian made his new site available and I
If you find cases where the manual says something will work (or you read it
as saying that) and the product doesn't support it, then I would say that is
DEFINITELY a place where you should create a support PMR.
If you have questions about how to (and the manuals aren't clear), and it
is for
Why am I seeing APARs for coexistence or toleration with z/OS 1.10
that go back to z/OS 1.6 (which is already past EOS)? I am seeing them
via ASAP notification. I saw one for WLM today and I know I saw one for
sysplex join as soon as z/OS 1.10 was previewed and perhaps a couple
of others.
You are right. But as the PMR way is a slow lane and
I prefer to be sure that the error is in the product
rather than behind the keyboard I need some more data.
As nearly always, when You should do a PMR or write
a RCF You don't have the time.
I will try at comp.lang.cobol as You suggested.
We will be implementing a basic sysplex and use MQ with SDSF server so
that SDSF DA can see the jobs on both z/OS systems. The question has
come up about cancelling a job on the DA screen when you're on one
system and the job is running on the other system. Will this work?
--
John McKown
Senior
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip--
Why am I seeing APARs for coexistence or toleration with z/OS 1.10
that go back to z/OS 1.6 (which is already past EOS)? I am seeing them
via ASAP notification. I saw one for WLM today and I know I saw one for
sysplex join as soon as z/OS 1.10
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 17:40
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!
Looks like what I'm coding. (Except that I use AT CHANGE.)
Is that C++ modules ?
Thomas
_
Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:33:40 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will be implementing a basic sysplex and use MQ with SDSF server so
that SDSF DA can see the jobs on both z/OS systems. The question has
come up about cancelling a job on the DA screen when you're on one
system and the
Alan Altmark wrote:
I'm not sure why you're tying book format to DCF. DCF is rarely used with
System z publications, as book maintenence and formatting were moved to
workstations years ago. The tools can produce a variety of output formats,
depending on the requirement.
What software
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:59:44 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:33:40 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will be implementing a basic sysplex and use MQ with SDSF server so
that SDSF DA can see the jobs on both z/OS systems. The question has
come up
All of your suggestions make sense. However, you really should address the
main culprit here, namely the HW*.** in your include. This, effectively,
causes DSS to search all of your catalogs via SVC 26. This approach, as I
recall from SHARE, causes catalog reorientation, security processing,
Yup, I'm back. Clark Kidd had been monitoring IBM-Main for me for the last
couple of years, but I started back last week. I see that people still head
off in bizarre directions (i.e. SHARE handouts), but this is still one of
the best forums I know of where people really help out other people.
Rob Schramm asks:
I haven't looked this up... but is the license for the IBM Metal C mor=
e
attractive to the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++
compiler?
Since the topic is COBOL calling COBOL to invoke a Java method,
C and C++ are not needed and are irrelevant to the question.
It
Ok Tom, then let me rephrase as a topic drift.
Does anyone know if the license for the IBM Metal C is more attractive to
the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler?
-Rob Schramm
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Someone just pointed out to me that our z/OS 1.9 systems have never
issued IOS070E MOUNT PENDING messages. I searched the log history and
confirmed.
We used to get these messages all the time on older z/OS releases. We
trap them and forward as an instant message reminder to our tape person.
Rob Schramm wrote:
Does anyone know if the license for the IBM Metal C is more attractive to
the customers that may have balked at the IBM C/C++ compiler?
AFAIK, METAL is an option not a compiler.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los
AFAIK, METAL is an option not a compiler
That is correct.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Hi John,
Thanks for the feedback..
We will implement your suggestions too but based on the job log output, it
took about 5 minutes to do the dataset filtering :
23.35.51 JOB10904 -STEPNAME PROCSTEPRC EXCP CONNTCBSRB
CLOCK
23.35.51 JOB10904 -ESPCCCHK 00 45
We will be implementing a basic sysplex and use MQ with SDSF server so that
SDSF DA can see the jobs on both z/OS systems. The question has come up about
cancelling a job on the DA screen when you're on one system and the job is
running on the other system. Will this work?
Yes:
1. This has
What is the best way to separate datasets within a storage group.
Applications want 3 datasets A.B.** to always be allocated on
different packs
than 3 datasets A.C.**
These are small files, and I hate to waste an entire volume to create
another STG GROUP...
just to isolate them...
Edward Jaffe wrote:
What software do they use?
It's a mixture of internal tools and some commercially-available SGML
workstation products. I don't think the details are confidential, but I
don't know them beyond what I just said. I briefly looked into using
the workbench some time ago.
Dave Myers wrote:
What is the best way to separate datasets within a storage group.
Applications want 3 datasets A.B.** to always be allocated on
different packs
than 3 datasets A.C.**
These are small files, and I hate to waste an entire volume to create
another STG GROUP...
just
Is anyone familiar with messages
ACC20210-A ADDVOL FOR DD=SYS4
DSN=T.RA.VIB.DXX.SXX.Y.D08065.T47259 VOL=SUSR01 POOL=ACTIONT
EXT=16
ACC20600-A VOLUME * WAS ADDED TO DATA SET
I know that it is a product that is here but I don't know which one.
Goggle showed the message at a
You could break up a large Stg group into 2 components, assign a.b.** to one of
the components, assign a.c.** to the other and concatenate the 2 components for
the rest of your allocations.
or as Mark suggests let the apps people play storage administrator, something
that historically
Within a single storage group, the only way I can think to do it is with
Guarunteed Space coding volser's. I wouldn't recommend it though.
What kind of environment to you have? With Raid hardware, PAV's, etc.,
these datasets would have to be pretty hot to justify jumping through
hoops to
This is probably DTS Software's SCC product. Storage Control Center. It is an
improved STOPX37 product.
It has rules that will monitor allocation and if needed add volumes to prevent
space abends.
Lizette
Is anyone familiar with messages
ACC20210-A ADDVOL FOR DD=SYS4
Good chance it's ACC/SRS from DTS Software
Alan Schwartz
Affiliated Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Message ACC20210 - who
Applications want 3 datasets A.B.** to always be allocated on different
packs than 3 datasets A.C.**
Why?
In an SMS environment, data management is supposed to be taken away from
applications.
As long as the data is responsive, protected, backed up, and meets business
needs, they
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:59:19 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone just pointed out to me that our z/OS 1.9 systems have never
issued IOS070E MOUNT PENDING messages. I searched the log history and
confirmed.
We used to get these messages all the time on older z/OS releases. We
trap
Thanks Alan and Lizette, that makes me feel less crazy.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/05/2008 02:28 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
We don't have this product but there is a reference to the character sets in
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r4/topic/rzalu/rzalurefprt2hostfnt.htm:
C0S0D224 GOTHIC TEXT 13
C0S0D225 GOTHIC TEXT 13
C0S0D226 GOTHIC BOLD 13
C0S0D227 GOTHIC ITAL 13
I also found these
BIZARRE is an understatement.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Cheryl Walker
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 SYSN 09:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z10 LSPR
Yup, I'm back. Clark Kidd had been monitoring IBM-Main
Better URL:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r4/topic/rzalu/rzalurefprt2hostfnt.htm
(removing the trailing ':').
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:15 -0600, Big Iron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't have this product but there is a reference to the character sets in
In a message dated 3/5/2008 1:17:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
workstation products. I don't think the details are confidential, but I
don't know them beyond what I just said. I briefly looked into using
the workbench some time ago.
But isn't the z/OS Book
Mark Zelden wrote:
What do you have specified or defaulted for MNTS? Did that change in
recent years? I see the default is still documented as 3:00
IOS086I 09.46.38 MIH AND IOT TIMES 889
MOUNTMSG = YES,HALT=00:05, MNTS=03:00, UREC=03:00,
DASD=00:15, TAPE=03:00, GRAF=03:00, CTC
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:59:19 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone just pointed out to me that our z/OS 1.9 systems have never
issued IOS070E MOUNT PENDING messages. I searched the log history and
confirmed.
We used to get these messages all the time on older z/OS releases. We
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:38:59 -0600, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, a tutorial would be nice, but I've always found the basic help info
sufficient. YMMV, of course.
So there is a tutorial in SDSF. I don't remember when it first appeared,
but I thought I remembered seeing it a
Dave,
What is the best way to separate datasets within a storage group.
Applications want 3 datasets A.B.** to always be allocated on
different packs
than 3 datasets A.C.**
These are small files, and I hate to waste an entire volume to create
another STG GROUP...
just to isolate
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:00:20 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
What do you have specified or defaulted for MNTS? Did that change in
recent years? I see the default is still documented as 3:00
IOS086I 09.46.38 MIH AND IOT TIMES 889
MOUNTMSG = YES,
Thomas Berg wrote:
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 17:40
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
Looks like it's time to open a PMR (I just did a quick IBMLINK search
and came up empty). Please post your results. I am very interested
also because we have not rolled out 1.9 yet but will be doing so soon.
Record 53521,227,000 has been submitted.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Huh.. well.. I guess I am off to the manual/announcements. I was under
the impression that it was separately ordered... not just a part of the
existing C/C++ offering. I must have been engaging in wishful thinking.
-Rob Schramm
Sirius Computer Solutions
AFAIK, METAL is an option not a
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:07:53 +, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will be implementing a basic sysplex and use MQ with SDSF
server so that SDSF DA can see the jobs on both z/OS systems. The
question has come up about cancelling a job on the DA screen when
you're on one system and the
VTAM/Netview Gurus:
Can anyone explain why we're getting the following messages when we start
VTAM and how we might be able to eliminate them? I suspect it has
something to do with the interaction between VTAM and NetView, but I'm
stumped so far.
IST1205I MANAGEMENT SERVICES TRANSPORT
I think when we used to use Netview that Netview came up before VTAM, so
this would explain the messages. I believe that Netview should come up
first from what I remember.
C. Todd Burrell
Lead z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 723-2017 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
At 2008-03-04 10:01, Gary Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
Re: Setting up a service class for DDF to IBM-Main:
We also started years ago with one or two DDF service classes, [snip]
most effective has been to code a HI/MED/LOW setup [snip] each with
ONE and ONLY ONE service class period
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Applications want 3 datasets A.B.** to always be allocated on different
packs than 3 datasets A.C.**
Why?
In an SMS environment, data management is supposed to be taken away from
applications.
As long as the data is responsive, protected, backed up, and meets
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Hunter Cobb
Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 21:28
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...
Thomas,
Some experiments with AT CHANGE confirm Don's observations about
More SDSF tutorial information at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/pdf/sdsf_overview.pdf
George Fogg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
In a message dated 3/5/2008 4:32:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
_http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/pdf/sdsf_overview.pdf_
(http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/pdf/sdsf_overview.pdf)
Or you can just stop after the /sdsf/
If it turns out that there is something that Debug Tool can't do - that you
think it should, I just wanted to let all of you know that the LNGC project
at SHARE is now accepting (processing) requirements against that product.
If you are a SHARE member and would like to enhance Debug Tool (for
The first example has no debug tool variables (strings that begin with a
%); debug tool seems to be happy with explicit names in various
combinations, it's only when you attempt to use a debug tool variable
that it gets fussy. The only time I found a problem with explicit names
(not sure it
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:21 -0600, Scott Fagen wrote:
Some things that seemed to make sense.
Pretty good guess-work for some-one who doesn't work for IBM, I'd
reckon ... :0)
Shane...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:37:54 -0500, Burrell, C. Todd
(CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think when we used to use Netview that Netview came up before
VTAM, so
this would explain the messages. I believe that Netview should come
up
first from what I remember.
...
We start VTAM
If you are not already a member, all the NetView people hang out at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetView/
You can subscribe via e-mail without having to sign-up for a Yahoo account.
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:29:22 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:21 -0600, Scott Fagen wrote:
Some things that seemed to make sense.
Pretty good guess-work for some-one who doesn't work for IBM, I'd
reckon ... :0)
Shane...
I was going to say that almost anyone could
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:27:28 -0500, Rob Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use the IXCQUERY macro
There is a whole book in z/OS bookshelf dedicated to the sysplex services
that you can call.
You can if you are supervisor state or key 0-7. A poor man's way might be to
use REXX and address
Walt,
True, but a -user- does not convert from SDSF security to RACF. The system
programmer does that, and he does not do it by reading a user manual, but
rather by reading the boo,k intended for system programmers, SDSF
Operations and Customization.
my bad. I think that SDSF Operations and
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 20:45 -0600, Scott Fagen wrote:
I was going to say that almost anyone could figure it out from the Planning:
GRS book, but
after reading 3.2.2.2.3 Residency time value (RESMIL), I can now understand
the confusion that was the genesis of this thread.
Do I have to
resend with a subject, sorry about that!
Walt,
True, but a -user- does not convert from SDSF security to RACF. The system
programmer does that, and he does not do it by reading a user manual, but
rather by reading the boo,k intended for system programmers, SDSF
Operations and Customization.
my
Hi all,
In order to collect more SMF record for CICS, I try to collect SMF record on
one large data set (DSNTYPE=LARGE), An error IEC143I-17 is issued. Is that
means the IEFSMFDP cannot read data set has more than 65535 tracks? or large
data set?
Tommy
Yesterday I had occcasion to use the CMDS command extensively. I noticed (under
1.8) what I had already seen under 1.6:
CMDS S,ID=1
MATCHING COMMANDS EXECUTING: 1
COMMAND NAME: SET COMMAND
It works, but IFASMFDP is not the most modern program in the arsenal.
SORT(either one) might be a better choice for your needs.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:43 PM
To:
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
