Disabling javascript will leave you disenfranchised from an increasingly
large number of (increasingly important) websites. But at least you have
an extension to make this SELECTIVE.
As a big Firefox fan (writing extensions and living on the BLEEDING edge
by running Nightlies) I wonder if IE
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at all
costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so I've no
idea what it's using javascript for. Hopefully dojo.
Martin
Martin Packer
Performance
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) writes:
As a big Firefox fan (writing extensions and living on the BLEEDING edge
by running Nightlies) I wonder if IE even HAS
I have to ask, did you run the PSP bucket for z10? We just went through
this upgrade, and the list was pretty long, and included ICSF
maintenance.
___
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
Mullen, Patrick wrote:
I thought this would be straight forward, but I can't get it to work
correctly.
Trying to FTP a DSORG=VB dataset from one z/OS 1.7 system to another z/OS
1.7 system. The dataset contains alphabetic and packed decimal data.
With no special commands, some of the packed
From:John Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ServerPac and zFS
SNIP
EZZ4203I Z/OS UNIX - TCP/IP CONNECTION ERROR FOR
TCPIP-BPX1PCT,800D,,0079,11B3005A
EZZ4203I Z/OS UNIX - TCP/IP CONNECTION ERROR FOR
TCPIP-BPX1PCT,C005,,0079,11B3005A
EZZ9315E TCP/IP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mariuca Iftime
It is no PTF available for ZOS 1.9, only ZOS 1.4
PTF List:
Release 740 : UA40682 available 08/05/07 (1000 ) == 1.9
Release 750 : PTF not available yet == 1.10
Release 750 :
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:59 -0400, Arthur T. wrote:
On 9 May 2008 06:21:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (F. J. Kelley) wrote:
Anyway, I've been asked if I can provide banners ...
sheesh ...
The kind printed on fanfold (ie greenbar)
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Alcock) wrote:
Ever since the Web came along I've been annoyed by those web
sites that won't accept spaces or dashes like for credit cards
and phone numbers. I know that even ancient mainframe COBOL has
support for removing them with one
Gil,
I think in this context, the new and nifty and PC-weenie comments were
based on the fact that in the eyes of most non-mainframers, these things are
new and nifty despite the fact that they have been common-place in CICS
and IMS applications for almost 40 years. Similar to the contempt many
On 12 May 2008 01:55:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) wrote:
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be
avoided at all costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink
in that regard.
Remember, you're not just
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Alcock)
This thread comes at a pivotal point for us because we're looking at the
same sort of CEC swap-out in the near future. When we conducted our first
DR test 10 years ago, we experienced very much the same problem: fully
mirrored couple data sets were convinced that we had somehow left the old
CFs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, David Alcock wrote:
Ever since the Web came along I've been annoyed by
In a message dated 5/11/2008 5:39:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cursor would be in the first field the user needed to fix. I hate web
pages that say Correct errors in red If the error is a blank, you
can't find it. With our technique, you knew which fields
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Morning, All.
Went to z/OS 1.9 yesterday on our main DEV system, which also runs some
PROD batch. One of our Capacity Performance RMF processing jobs got an
S806 on module ERBPPSRT. It was pointed out years ago (in this forum)
that this sort exit in SYS1.SERBLINK had been replaced by
Arthur T. wrote:
Java is safe, at least theoretically, because it runs in its own
virtual machine. Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to
your machine.
I'm not sure I agree here.
Java is safe only to the point where
- core classes are properly implemented to prevent
Mariuca Iftime wrote:
It is no PTF available for ZOS 1.9, only ZOS 1.4
z/OS 1.4 is no longer in service. The oldest supported release is z/OS
1.7; end of service for that release is scheduled for this September.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
[ snip ] Also, it annoys me that (I have done this on occasion)
the sites don't validate the combination of state and zip
code. Especially since the drop-downs aren't always in the
same order,
In a message dated 5/12/2008 9:31:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
circumvent this rocky road when we come back up with everything else intact
but for the CFs. OP's experience suggests otherwise. I now have to rethink
the whole process.
Almost like we need a 'cold
snip
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at all
costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so I've no
idea what it's using javascript for.
Only in chrome. I.e. in a Firefox extension. The capabilities of other
javascript environments are very much restricted.
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
[snip]
present. I've got a serious problem with that; I wish I
On 12 May 2008 08:20:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
Don't forget the multi-word surnames, like Van de Graaf, de la Hoya,
etc. I'm sure those folks tire from receiving form-letter
acknowledgements that start with Dear Mr. Van: or Dear Mr. de:.
I'm doing case conversions of
On 12 May 2008 08:21:52 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve
Comstock) wrote:
I once met an instructor in San Francisco whose name was
something_or_other III. He decided the III was the only
part that gave him uniqueness. He had his name legally
changed to '3'. Failed a lot of validation tests on many
We are currently converting from CICS TS1.3 to CICS TS3.2, and we want
to implement ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security.
There is an ACF2 Tool ACFHFSRP which generates resource rules for all
HFS directories. This tool does not create the
NEXTKEY entries for CICSTS32 XML directories which is over 4000 lines.
John,
For multiple states beginning with the same letter, keep pressing the first
letter Four or five times for Arizonagrin
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM
This was documented on pp 236 of the migration guide
snip
Went to z/OS 1.9 yesterday on our main DEV system, which also runs
some
PROD batch. One of our Capacity Performance RMF processing jobs got
an
S806 on module ERBPPSRT. It was pointed out years ago (in this forum)
that this sort
Rick Fochtman wrote:
snip
I hope you're not suggesting javascript is evil and to be avoided at
all costs. And I do hope you'll trust IBMLink in that regard.
Note: I haven't even bothered to Ctrl+U or Ctrl+Shift+I IBMLInk so
I've no idea what it's
On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:05:48 +, John P Donnelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security and setup the resource
rules for the HFS directories?
Is there a better way to protect the HFS directories from the
application programming staff?
Better? That is a
On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:49:02 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
Yuck!
ITYM
TMFLCEFACILITIESLISTBYTE2,FLCEEXTENDEDIMMEDIATE
Personally, I prefer to use the mixed case symbols from the PL/X expansions:
TMFlceFacilitiesListByte2,FlceExtendedImmediate
Agreed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
[ snip ]
I did work for a company that had to clean up addresses - it
had a dirty word file that it used - but I've read of some
foreign dirty
words that are valid places and names. . . .
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Donnelly
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA ACF2 SAF HFS Security and COCSTS32
[snip]
Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security
We are running Z/os 1.7. It recently came to my attention that VIO had been
implemented in such a way that temp datasets no matter how small ALWAYS went to
DASD. One of my predessesors used a storclas with Guaranteed Space. Anyway a
user asked to be able to use VIO so I turned it on. Today he
We did this recently. Removed the old processor without moving the
structures before shutting down.
We realized we'd seen this situation when going to DR so we ended up
deleting the CFRM datasets and reloading them with the new policy and
then ipling the sysplex.
For us this was the cleanest
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
We are running Z/os 1.7. It recently came to my attention that VIO had been
implemented in such a way that temp datasets no matter how small ALWAYS went to
DASD. One of my predessesors used a storclas with Guaranteed Space. Anyway a
user asked to be able
_
From: Carlson, Steven
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:07 AM
To: Donnelly, John P
Subject: IBMMAIN Question
John:
I found this question in IBMMAIN, and would like to send it again.
Has anyone implemented the CA-ACF2 SAF HFS security facility to
replace Unix security
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
Ed,
Customer feedback for elapsed time follows:
Actually the elapsed time was substantially shorter for the VIO tests:
- the VIO tests both executed in .02 min
- the physical IO tests executed in .05 and .07 min
Still I rather doubt that they will
Ed,
Thank you for the response.
I doubt paging would be an issue on this machine.
The user did not report back on elapsed times. I suspect when he saw the
charges for the job had doubled, elapsed time took secondary importance.
From: Edward Jaffe
I expect it's because VIO requires cycles. Definitely true when simulating
a device in memory. Quite possibly also true when doing VIO to page data
sets on disk.
What I used to call the DIM Coffee Table Book :-) showed VIO to Expanded
Storage burnt CPU compared to doing it to straight temp
Yup, it was. Definitely a local (my) error, not IBM's.
My post was an observation that, while some migration actions may be
ignored, this one can't.
Skipping multiple releases, going thru those same multiple releases'
migration and planning guides, almost a guarantee I'll miss something.
Ed,
Customer feedback for elapsed time follows:
Actually the elapsed time was substantially shorter for the VIO tests:
- the VIO tests both executed in .02 min
- the physical IO tests executed in .05 and .07 min
Still I rather doubt that they will pay for the quicker turn around.
In a message dated 5/12/2008 12:17:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I used to call the DIM Coffee Table Book :-) showed VIO to Expanded
Storage burnt CPU compared to doing it to straight temp data sets on disk.
For MOST data points.
There used to be some
Edward E Jaffe wrote:
That is -- and AFAIK has always been -- the VIO trade-off. CPU time for
clock time.
Yes, that's right. And VIO should be compared and contrasted with other
DIM techniques for Batch. I've a feeling I wrote a blog post about it a
few months ago. I should've because I
You are correct that this auditing must be done. This Application Auditing
must include not just what a RACF log would show - that someone had access to a
file, but to show exactly what the user saw. It is one thing to know that
someone logged in, accessed a sensitive file and logged out
From what I understand about JAVA vs. JAVASCRIPT, which I freely
admit
may be a faulty understanding, there are important differences.
Javascript and JAVA are apples and fish. It's like CLIST versus COBOL.
There are some similar semantic constructs but that's about all.
Javascript is just a
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:09:18 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The other thing that irritates many is the US (and English?) centric
First Name, Middle Name (or initial), Last Name. ...
First Name, Middle Initial, Last Name has always bothered me.
And those (admittedly fewer)
Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get it's
timestamp information from? I have a programmer who just performed an
FTP GET command to a PDS member. The ISPF statistics were updated with
the FTP GET. Unfortunately, the timestamp placed on the member is 5
hours into the
Report: HP to buy EDS for $12-13 billion (possibly to be announced as early as
tomorrow?)
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9942051-7.html
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
snip
but where does the FTP client get it's timestamp information from?
snip
FTP belongs to the brave UNIX world. Sounds like you don't have
TZ=EST5EDT
export TZ
set in etc profile or are not executing it..
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
On 12 May 2008 10:35:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
You are correct that this auditing must be done. This Application Auditing
must include not just what a RACF log would show - that someone had access to
a file, but to show exactly what the user saw. It is one thing to know
snip
Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get it's
timestamp information from? I have a programmer who just performed an
FTP GET command to a PDS member. The ISPF statistics were updated with
the FTP GET. Unfortunately, the timestamp placed on the member is 5
hours into
On 12 May 2008 11:33:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Edward E Jaffe wrote:
That is -- and AFAIK has always been -- the VIO trade-off. CPU time for
clock time.
Yes, that's right. And VIO should be compared and contrasted with other
DIM techniques for Batch. I've a feeling I
Jack,
I forgot to mention one item. It's being run as a batch job so
/etc/profile isn't a player.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
snip
Jack,
I forgot to mention one item. It's being run as a batch job so
/etc/profile isn't a player.
Rex
/snip
Rex,
I still believe it runs through the FTP (usually called FTPD) STC, and
that will use the TZ envrionment variable.
Fletch
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
Jack,
I forgot to mention one item. It's being run as a
snip
It's being run as a batch job so /etc/profile isn't a player.
snip
Batch doesn't make any difference, you just have batch UNIX. 'tis a brave
new world...
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Does anyone know whether z/os 1.9 will be offered to PWD members. The last
release I have is 1.8.
TIA,
Fred Hoffman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
So would I set this in the /etc/init.options file?
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
snip
Fred Hoffman wrote:
Does anyone know whether z/os 1.9 will be offered to PWD members. The last
release I have is 1.8.
TIA,
Fred Hoffman
We installed z/OS 1.9 on our zPad last month. Came as part of
the Cornerstone / FLEX-es / PWD package. Not sure who does
which part, to tell you the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Probably a basic TCP/IP question
Sorry for a basic question, but where does the FTP client get it's
We also went throught this situation recently. After the Cf swap, the sysplex
still had a pending situation, waiting for the now non-existent CF to come
online. Approximately 100 hours after the CF swap, it suddenly cleared itself
with no other manual intervention, all pending status's
At 09:59 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Howard Brazee wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
Around 1968 I read a book where this guy had a long hyphenated name
which the computers kept having troubles with. He invented a
bacterium that ate computer tapes for revenge - which made him an
At 09:51 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
It's a real dilema for webpage developers. I recently redesigned
our home page. My initial design was to be very minimalist, just
a few lines, but if you clicked a line it was expanded, using
At 16:38 +0100 on 05/12/2008, Martin Packer wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to your machine.
What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is dangerous?
It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so it can not look
At 11:27 -0500 on 05/12/2008, Chase, John wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
[ snip ]
I did work for a company that had to clean up addresses - it
had a dirty word file that it
The normal user gets an interactive copy of the page while the Paranoid
Luddites get a
non-interactive static page.
Is it truly being a luddite to not want your PC screwed over by bad/malicious
external code?
I've been hit too many times, and I know better.
Our security people know even more
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 4:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web
In a case of this type, all you need to do is place a
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 09:51 -0600 on 05/12/2008, Steve Comstock wrote about Re: Mainframe
programming vs the Web:
It's a real dilema for webpage developers. I recently redesigned
our home page. My initial design was to be very minimalist, just
a few lines, but if you clicked a line it
Yes, I have had the HFS protected by ACF2 for a least 2 years or more.
This is fairly common. Try the ACF2 list on Yahoo for help on ACF2
Doug Fuerst
Subject: CA ACF2 SAF HFS Security and COCSTS32
[snip]
Has anyone implemented ACF2 CA SAF HFS Security and setup the resource
In a message dated 5/12/2008 4:13:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Novel before getting to your message. Based on this memory, and on
impulse, I just right now bought a copy so I can reread it. Copies
are available from Amazon if you want to reread it yourself.
I think John wins the prize! I just IPLed my sandbox moving the local
time 2 hours to the west and the FTP client still put a GMT timestamp on
the member it put into the PDS. The programmer who reported it to me
reported it as a z/OS 1.7 upgrade issue and since I have no 1.4 LPARs
left, I
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 13:15 -0400, Steven Conway wrote:
Skipping multiple releases, going thru those same multiple releases'
migration and planning guides, almost a guarantee I'll miss something.
I tend to rely on Marnas (fantastic) offering in lieu of the official
guides - more so where
It's un-American not to have a one syllable nickname. ;-)
On the other hand, legal names have to be accommodated whether it's COBOL
on punch cards or entry fields on a web window. It would be nice to see
some sincere concern for the end user. AKA the one who pays for the
'service'.
What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is
dangerous? It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so
it can not look at your files) or things like that.
According to other posters, it can.
Since I'm not a JAVA expert, I'll defer to their expertise.
-
Too busy driving to stop for
What EXACTLY do you claim that JavaScript can do that is
dangerous? It has no ability to access the Hard Drive (so
it can not look at your files) or things like that.
According to other posters, it can.
Since I'm not a JAVA expert, I'll defer to their expertise.
Javascript is not JAVA!
Javascript is not JAVA! Chant it if it helps you to remember...
Admittingly, I'm not an expert (I said that).
My point was that both seem to be exposures.
I've seen posts that both have security issues.
I deferr to the experts on this.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On 12 May 2008 14:14:14 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg) wrote:
At 16:38 +0100 on 05/12/2008, Martin Packer wrote about
Re: Mainframe programming vs the Web:
Javascript, by design, can do damn near anything to your
As a USS program, FTP probably uses the C library's time functions,
which don't know about the z/OS PARMLIB setting!
You probably have to set the TZ environment variable if you want to
see local time. Use the ENVAR() LE parm option (or via CEEOPTS if
you are running 1.7+).
You would think that
Off the top of my head, I believe you have to tell VTAM that there are separate
inbound and outbound paths between the two nodes. Sounds like you're
configuration has forced your links to be half-duplex.
db
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
We wish to follow the advice given in an earlier to cap MSU usage of our 2
LPARs (2 monoplexes) by intoducing a dummy CF LPAR when we upgrade our
z890. I understand we should SET DYNDISP OFF.
But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a
fixed number of MSUs (capped of
Arthur T. wrote:
I'm not an expert, so I let Google do the work. Some of the
exploits are old, but they do or did exist. Here's just a sample:
As you may of noticed - most of the security issues are 'implementation'
issues - not design issues..
Now, the same goes for Real Language
But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a fixed
number of MSUs (capped of course).
CF's do not contribute to MSU charging.
They should always be allowed to run without any form of capping or sharing.
What problem are you trying to solve?
-
Too busy driving to stop
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and hasn't had many
replies. I am forwarding it to the list-server, to see if more people have
input on it. (It is also in the comp.lang.cobol newsgroup).
Graham Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
Big
IBM has a webcast scheduled at 2:00 p.m. Eastern U.S. (New York) time on
May 22, 2008, focused on how to deliver and improve operational business
intelligence on System z. Business intelligence needs are maturing rapidly,
and for increasing numbers of businesses it is no longer acceptable to wait
There are probably outstanding failed persistent connections to the CF
that you need to delete. Use the command
d xcf,cf,cfname=CF2
to get a list of structures that XCF thinks is allocated on that CF. Then
you can use the command
d xcf,str,strname=strname
to get a list of connections to
On 12 May 2008 15:03:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
It's un-American not to have a one syllable nickname. ;-)
On the other hand, legal names have to be accommodated whether it's COBOL
on punch cards or entry fields on a web window. It would be nice to see
some sincere concern for
Thanks Bill.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Fw: CICS/BMS greenies to GUI's
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and hasn't had many
But what would be a good weight for the CF LPAR so it always consume a
fixed number of MSUs (capped of course).
CF's do not contribute to MSU charging.
They should always be allowed to run without any form of capping or
sharing.
What problem are you trying to solve?
Upgrading capacity of z890
Thanks Kevin for Your detailed answer .
Attached are the Commands I used with the results.
Again, the problem is that CFRM still has the allocations on
CF2 which used to be on 2094 .
Now CF2 is on 2097, therfore the CF is not connected, preventing
any action on its structures !
-d
Hello Alan ,
You wrote :
We realized we'd seen this situation when going to DR so we ended up
deleting the CFRM datasets and reloading them with the new policy and
then ipling the sysplex.
I like this solution, but isn't it possible to perform this without the
entire SYSPLEX IPL ?
As our
On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:34:11 -0500, Cwi Jeret wrote:
Attached are the Commands I used with the results.
Again, the problem is that CFRM still has the allocations on
CF2 which used to be on 2094 .
Now CF2 is on 2097, therfore the CF is not connected, preventing
any action on its structures !
Upgrading capacity of z890 but capping total MSUs of existing 2 LPARs to 26
MSUs, but also not wanting to cap each LPAR as such (i.e. each LPAR could
get the whole 26 MSUs if the other LPAR is idle). Therefore using the dummy CF
LPAR to consume the MSUs we do not want to be charged for.
I
94 matches
Mail list logo
