I'm sorry but i wasn't clear enough , in this sentence you quote me I refer
to a LOAD of Z/os without using of an already running OS .
I was refer to getting a z/OS from blank (DASD empty) and without TAPEs
this leave us the option to LOAD a SA software from the DVD (or even USB - I
don't
I haven't done this myself on a web server, so I don't know how to
configure the web server to do it, but I know, from the client's
perspective, that Paypal's web server does it by returning a Location
header to the client browser with the https URL, which causes the client
browser to issue
Load a z/VM evaluation copy from HMC-DVD-RAM and use it to download z/OS?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/eval/zvm53eef.pdf
z/10 required.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry but i wasn't clear enough , in this sentence you quote me I refer
to a LOAD of
it's not a bad idea! but what did you ment by Z/10 require?
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Load a z/VM evaluation copy from HMC-DVD-RAM and use it to download z/OS?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/eval/zvm53eef.pdf
z/10 required.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:08
z/VM evaluation DVD-RAMs won't run on an older processor. Maybe and
earlier version will.
Or maybe a z/Linux IPLable DVD should run on any Z processor, if the
processor supports IPLing from the DVD.
There was a minimum level requirement in the PDF document for the HMC code too.
On Wed, Aug 4,
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I got a question from one of my co workers on why his job abended with an
S822 Reason=0014
The job have over 200 steps running mostly DB2 Tools from CA. There is no
region size on the jobcard. Each step (except the one that got the S822)
has a REGION=0M
Why? As
Sure, and if he is trying to exlude records for temporary datasets,
there a parameter in SMFPRMxx for it.
Kees.
Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com wrote in message
news:a30a9f528e618748a8ef5199e80c4a1c04cfc...@wkpp1infmb03.cbsh.com...
I'm also curious as to why you would want to filter
W dniu 2010-08-03 23:00, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
[...]
Give them the RMF data and make them run their models (they all have them).
Make sure the performance guarantees are there before the contract is signed,
not after.
I don't believe in benchmarketting; the only TRUE test is Production.
How do
W dniu 2010-08-04 02:10, Clark, Kevin pisze:
Excellent...thank you sir...
With such limited options for Mainframe (Enterprise tape drives) our targeted
solution will come down to the best reseller with non technical add-ons.
Sure could use another vendor in this market (Hitachi - Memorex )
YOU CANNOT TEST YOUR PRODUCTION before you move your production on the ONE
VENDORs equipment.
Our last acquisition(s) we used time-finder, FDRPAS, or some other equivalent
to migrate.
And, we monitored while moving.
To summarize, your approach is more or less I don't care about any
technical
We have a WEBSRV running on the Mainframe and we are trying to figure out
how to get our address of http:// to automatically convert to https:// when
the user types it in...
Believe you are asking for users who type in http://; is for it to get
converted to https://; on the return and
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I got a question from one of my co workers on why his job abended with an
S822 Reason=0014
The job have over 200 steps running mostly DB2 Tools from CA. There is no
region size on the jobcard. Each step (except the one that got the S822)
has a REGION=0M
The step
Stand by for a bumpy ride if this works as well as the other recent
improvement efforts!
snip
Announcement of Enhancements to the ETR Function
We are pleased to announce that the next generation of IBM's ETR
electronic
tool is launching during 4Q 2010 with the enhanced IBM Service Request
(SR)
I am finally old enough not to be embarrassed by my own lack of understanding.
Built a one pack recovery system via Mark's routine and am tailoring it now.
The stump point is how do I IPL it? Do I create a SYS1.IPLPARM on that pack
and go from there or what?
That stems from a future DR exercise
Something you could also add in DIAGxx is VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS(256K,100M) with
numbers related to your shop RTM. This will recycle wlm and jes2 inits when the
region available is less than the amount specified. It will not help this job
per say, but would recycle the init afterwards to cleanup
The stump point is how do I IPL it? Do I create a SYS1.IPLPARM on t
The stump point is how do I IPL it? Do I create a SYS1.IPLPARM on that pack
and go from there or what?
You *can* place your LOADxx on SYS1.IPLPARM, but you don't have to.
Since Mark's jobs create a SYS1.PARMLIB, you can
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:30:31 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
I spent quite some time debugging a similar 822 on certain Endeavor-jobs. My
IEFUSI unconditionally overrides any region smaller than 32M to give the full
region below. ...
??? And zero above? Sounds broken to me? Rationale?
What does
IBM currently seems to have three formats for documentation. They are:
BookManager (.boo), Adobe PDF, and some other which seems to be Information
Center format and is webby.
I have a Kindle DX and keep IBM's documentation in PDF format on it. A friend
here said the DX is too large. But the
Exactly!
snip
BOHICA ?
/snip
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enhancements coming to ETR function in IBMLINK
Stand by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Wayne Bickerdike
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 9:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SuperCE
Um, no.
Two file matches don't work too well without a sort.
Not true.
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:02:29 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Peter Relson wrote:
As to your point
about
allocating using space based on a format shown in a book, that is not
using best programming practices when a symbol is provided in a macro.
I disagree. I use the docs as
Thanks to all who replied.
Yes, at 1am in the morning I was not truly as clear headed as I could have
been, and the size of IEFBR14 is not the issue.
Most likely the problem is going to be storage fragmentation for below the
line. Barbara's answer of using 0M for the region on that step will be
That should have been obvious to me...thank you for your assist.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Greetings,
For the last few SHAREs, I was able to look at the proceedings by clicking
on Proceedings and then the latest SHARE event would be at the top of the
drop down.
In fact, these were actually available before the SHARE even started.
For the current SHARE, I can't seem to locate any of
As one of the other posters recommended. USE VSMCHECKREGIONLOSS in
DIAGxx.
I checks for fragmentation and automatically drains/restarts the
initiatior thus, you do not have to review the dump.
HTH,
snip
Most likely the problem is going to be storage fragmentation for below
the
line. Barbara's
Hi:
You need to sign on and click on the right hand side where it says
conference schedule.
Regards,
Gene
In a message dated 8/4/2010 9:22:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
michaeljosephcle...@yahoo.com writes:
Greetings,
For the last few SHAREs, I was able to look at the proceedings
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of
Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Thanks Gene, I can see them now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Schenck
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest
Dude. One word cement truck.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Here's the byzantine path to get to the current proceedings:
- Go to share.org
- Mouse over Events
- On the drop down, click on Current Conference directly under events, NOT
Share Online from Boston
- Look for the Technical Program Content box and click on Online
Schedule (first link in the box)
Received the following message:
EZZ4310I ERROR: CODE=80100040 REPORTED ON DEVICE XX501. DIAGNOSTIC CODE: 03
The FM states for '0040': INOP-deact SAP Explanation: SAP has become
inoperative.
After quite a bit of digging, all I can find is that SAP means 'service access
point'. But no clue
Alan Schenck wrote:
Dude. One word cement truck.
Clueless.
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
My understanding is that anything over 16MiB normally results in whatever
below is available plus unlimited above.
Your understanding is wrong.
Anything over 16M does give you everything below, but it limits above.
If you specify between 16 and 32, you get 32 in total.
Whatever you specify above
Sorry, I left a hanging fragment from the original post.
Re-sent, corrected.
My understanding is that anything over 16MiB normally results in whatever
below is available plus unlimited above.
Your understanding is wrong.
Anything over 16M does give you everything below, but it limits above.
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:44:47 -0500, Daniel McLaughlin
daniel_mclaugh...@us.crawco.com wrote:
I am finally old enough not to be embarrassed by my own lack of understanding.
Built a one pack recovery system via Mark's routine and am tailoring it now.
The stump point is how do I IPL it? Do I create
In du2356lef63ibf2hqc4fgng1rrd62u9...@4ax.com, on 07/29/2010
at 11:14 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I don't know anything about the BUNCH operating systems and their
successors.
The had libraries, in some cases with better interfaces than PDS's.
I don't see anything
In listserv%201007020846367870.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/02/2010
at 08:46 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Yet there are products such as ClamAV for Linux, so it appears that
someone perceives a need.
If you're passing data to a vulnerable system then it makes sense to
scan those
Correction, if coding between 16M and 32M the default is 32M, from JCL
Reference:
If your installation does not change the IBM-supplied default limits in the
IEALIMIT
or IEFUSI exit routine modules, then specifying various values for the
region size
has the following results:
- A value equal to
In
701728a732d7324294b9ef836edbb7700114989...@msmail02.luv.ad.swacorp.com,
on 07/26/2010
at 10:57 AM, Mark Steely mark.ste...@wnco.com said:
We are z/OS V1R11. I am trying to copy the OMVS (ZFS) files to my
TEST system. I used DFDSS logical dump and restore and I also renamed
the files using
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:44:00 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Virtual drive libraries: IBM, STK/Oracle
Add Bus-Tech and EMC (DLm) to the list for virtual. IIRC, DLm is based
on the same Bus-Tech VTL.Sutmyn also used to be a player in that
space, but I think they haven't
Post top don't please.
In aanlktinddb_gap6j5mjrhfxhyknwf0jwdyv-n6uhi...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/03/2010
at 02:24 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
Nonsense.
You haven't got a clue. Go to their web site and read the terms.
The issues are that the requisite code to support the zBX is not
In 4c584ed4.8030...@ync.net, on 08/03/2010
at 12:16 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4c56d535.9020...@ync.net, on 08/02/2010
at 09:24 AM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
Most of those geometry-related System Services didn't exist! :-)
In 4c584e96.3080...@ync.net, on 08/03/2010
at 12:15 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
I can remember that a OS/360 Stage-1 assembly took just over 2 hours
on a 256K 360/44 with a DSO and reader present.
The 2044 didn't have SS instructions, so you got a performance hit
simulating
In 4c584e18.50...@ync.net, on 08/03/2010
at 12:12 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
The 2302 was also an oddball device, with rather strange geometry.
Oddball? It was just a repackaged 1302; the M3 had 2 modules and the
M4 had 4.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Are we missing something here? Didn't R.11 allow IEFBR14 to issue HDELETEs
as appropriate? And mightn't that take up some 24-Bit virtual?
(In addition to everything others are saying about fragmentation.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide
Per-user license fee for what? We're talking about Linux, IIRC. But
apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise architect -- a good
trick. I'm impressed.
BTW, it's not clear what their web site is -- IBM? SCO? Read it again --
read what? Clear as mud.
P.S. Let's not have the
One of the larger explosions on Myth Busters was a cement truck. It was
completely packed with C4. When it went off, the cement truck disappeared.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
Alan Schenck wrote:
Dude. One word cement truck.
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e04...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/03/2010
at 11:29 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
This is new to me. Are you saying that X/Open will not certify a
system as UNIX unless there is a way to have per user licenses?
Essentially. The
Alan Schenck wrote:
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the likes of
Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and Grant Imahara?
Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion
is just lost, and I suspect I'm not the only one.
--
Kind
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:58:36 -0400, zMan wrote:
Per-user license fee for what? We're talking about Linux, IIRC. But
apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise architect -- a good
trick. I'm impressed.
I guess you weren't paying attention to what you were replying to.
Shmuel's
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Just tell them, Oh! RACF does all that!
Lying to your management is not a good idea.
Agreed about lying, but see below:
Paul wrote on 2 July this (I quote fully for clarity):
Perhaps it's merely to satisfy a management edict that Every computer
must run AV
TV show called mythbusters. Great program!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe
Alan Schenck
out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that
much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it
really really was completely packed .. I used the stuff on occasion in
viet-nam, and believe me, you don't need 8 cubic yards of that
Hal
What does the output from an OSA/SF IOACMD QUERY ONE_OSA chpid
command show? You may need then to check the OSA fine manual, Open
Systems Adapter-Express Customers Guide and Reference, SA22-7935-10, in
order to interpret a code you will - I hope - find in the output.
Since XX501 is so
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question on size of IEFBR14 and z/OS V1.11
Barbara,
Thanks. This may be a similar issue. I
On 3 Aug 2010 22:16:33 -0700, timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy
Sipples) wrote:
Yet that's exactly what's NOT happening (or at least not happening fast
enough) in the rest of computing -- and that's a big problem for individual
businesses and for the planet. Remember those old movies which
No! See John Eells' post below. The HDELETE functionalty was added to
allocation and is triggered by the recognition of IEFBR14.
So, IEFBR14 has not increased in size but the addittional functionality within
allocation may well be the culprit.
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:58:04 +0100
Hal
Sorry, I intended to try the fine web before posting my previous response
but I forgot until I pressed Send!
CODE=80100040 OSA as search words to Google, offered APAR PK26843:
EZZ4310I ERROR: CODE=80100040 REPORTED ON DEVICE DEVNAME.
DIAGNOSTIC CODE: 03 as the first hit. The date is 2006
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
I guess you weren't paying attention to what you were replying to.
Shmuel's comment was about Linux being certified as Unix. It has
absolutely nothing to do with z/Enterprise architecture.
Ah. I actually was paying
You have to stay in more, and watch TV.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe
out of curiosity, do you recall just how they
Correction, if coding between 16M and 32M the default is 32M.
That's what I said:
16M above, is 32M in total.
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Didn't R.11 allow IEFBR14 to issue HDELETEs as appropriate?
No, that's not quite accurate.
IEFBR14 hasn't changed.
The HDELETEs are done by some mechanism within the system/initiator.
Not to hijack this thread, but (as I've said before) that's a kludge!
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers,
Osman
A few comments on your posting:
1. It distorts Google Groups when you take a post from an existing thread and
change the title in order to attempt to start a new thread - although the
regular archives don't get confused.
2. The list which the folk most likely to have an answer for you -
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Correction, if coding between 16M and 32M the default is 32M.
That's what I said:
16M above, is 32M in total.
Again from JCL Reference (32M above plus whatever is available below):
- A value greater than 16,384K or 16M
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 08/03/2010
10:45:09 AM:
From: John P Kalinich jkali...@csc.com
I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the
article.
Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a
3270 terminal
Youtube of Cement truck turning into confetti.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxm_qpKh7Jw
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bonno,
snip--
With single page i/o transfers on 2301 drum ... cp67 would saturate at
about 80 page i/os per second. With chained-requests, I could get peaks
approaching 300 page i/os per second (chained requests eliminated the
avg. 1/2
I'm still trying to figure out, what was the myth they were trying to expose?
I've watched the show a few times and always found it interesting, but each
time I have seen it, they were trying to get to the bottom of something, the
something in question being the myth . maybe I'm just ignernt
The myth was that someone took too long to empty the cement out of the truck,
allowed it to harden and then tried to use dynamite to clean out the hardened
cement.
Regards,
John
513-723-7527
john.king...@convergys.com
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
--snip-
I'm also curious as to why you would want to filter out the recording of
SMF records for certain datasets. SMF records are useful for a variety
of analysis tasks, not the least of which would be an audit trail in
case
ah. ok. thank you.
/s/ tuco bonno;
Graduate, College of Conflict Management;
University of SouthEast Asia;
I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !!
The myth was that someone took too long to empty the cement out of the truck,
allowed it to harden and then tried to use dynamite to
Our agency just replaced 10 (ten) STK 9310 silos with 2 (two) Oracle
VSMs (Virtual Storage Manager) and 2 (two) Oracle SL8500 tape
subsystems. They are working GREAT!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Clark, Kevin
Sent:
Steve Comstock wrote:
Alan Schenck wrote:
If this myth needs to be busted, may I suggest that we involve the
likes of Jamie Hyneman, Adam Savage, Tory Belleci, Kari Byron, and
Grant Imahara?
Duh! I don't know any of those names. Sorry, but the allusion
is just lost, and I suspect I'm not
Oracle just bought SUN. SUN recently bought STK. The VSM and SL8500 were
developed by STK, not ORACLE.
snip
Our agency just replaced 10 (ten) STK 9310 silos with 2 (two) Oracle
VSMs (Virtual Storage Manager) and 2 (two) Oracle SL8500 tape
subsystems. They are working GREAT!!
/snip
-snip
out of curiosity, do you recall just how they managed to get ahold of *that much* C4? you're talking about 8 CUBIC YARDS of the stuff in the mixer, if it really really was completely packed .. I used the
Someone asked me the question, and since we are having a good discussion, I
thought I would throw this out to the collective wisdom here.
If there is a job with 200+ steps. Is it better to have region coded at the
JOBCARD level or the STEP Level?
I have heard various thoughts on this over the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:10:14 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:02:29 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Peter Relson wrote:
As to your point
about
allocating using space based on a format shown in a book, that is not
using best programming practices when a
-snip---
but how many people who read the article know what odiferous horse
hockey it is?
--unsnip---
We should be working to help our management realize
is there a product that would allow me to use an ATL 3494 in the
z/OS
lpar and the zLinux lpar (in the same CEC) simultaneously ?
At the moment I'm using it in the z/OS lpar (with DFSMSrmm) only.
Yes, you can do it but now you are into getting the infrastructure on the z/VM
zLinux side
The extended region size is the default value of 32 megabytes.
I've obviously misinterpreted that statement then.
I always read it as total.
But, the major point is that 16M does not give you all above.
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
In days of yore, long, long ago, and far, far, away, it made sense to code at
the step level.
OS/MVT used a contiguous storage algorithm and reserved that storage for the
life of a job step..
If STEPB required more storage that STEPA, the possibility existed for
significant execution delays
So?
Did anyone claim that Oracle developed VSM or SL8500?
The notice below says that someone bought some product from Oracle,
nothing else. Nowadays SL8500 is onwed by Oracle - so it's Oracle product.
BTW: many IBM products are developed by still existing independent
companies. Examples: all
IMHO, whatever is, leave it. There would not be enough potential benefit to
justify the risks and cost.
My $0.02
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 1:07 PM
To:
W dniu 2010-08-04 20:07, Lizette Koehler pisze:
Someone asked me the question, and since we are having a good discussion, I
thought I would throw this out to the collective wisdom here.
If there is a job with 200+ steps. Is it better to have region coded at the
JOBCARD level or the STEP
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
We should be working to help our management realize just what that horse
hockey really means. NOTHING!!!
But they're so cute, on their little skates, with their four legs going in
all directions...
rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) writes:
At NCSS we devised a scheme to use 2305 devices for paging. We figured
3 pages per track and we inserted a gap record between the
pages. Thus we were able to fetch all three pages, from three
different exposures, in a single revolution of the device.
I was rerunning an z/OS 1.9 ADDRSU backup of a Mod 9 volume, 600 track
VTOC, 90% used with mostly 1 track datasets, 90% of VTOC entries used.
I had to specify a REGION=256MB because REGION=196MB abended, ended up
using about 205MB. when it finally completed.
I would continue with the 17MB or
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:24:02 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote:
In days of yore, long, long ago, and far, far, away, it made sense to code
at the step level.
OS/MVT used a contiguous storage algorithm
More precisely, MVT had a single address space
and reserved that storage for the life of a job
For Mainframe it is IBM and STK (Oracle) for both real and virtual
tape products, these two are the market leaders in both areas. For MF
virtual you can also look to Bus-Tech , EMC (Bus-Tech like) and Luminex.
These can be good choices for a shop with little to no real tape behind the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:07:20 -0400, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
Someone asked me the question, and since we are having a good discussion, I
thought I would throw this out to the collective wisdom here.
If there is a job with 200+ steps. Is it better to have region coded at
the
For new JCL I always recommend just putting an ample region size on the job
card and be done with it. But I would certainly not change running JCL for no
reason.
I always say if it ain't broke don't break it.
C. Todd Burrell
PMP, MCSE 2003:Security
Security+, Network+
Lead z/OS Systems
If you have a problem with the region size, add a REGION parameter to
the jobcard that is equal to or larger than any step, and overrides
all the steps. No need to remove the REGION from the steps or procs,
and any changes to the values could result in typo abends.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:43
In aanlktimxlrzyeth0vd-ap46rj=lxodyte6yrygnfh...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/04/2010
at 10:58 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
IIRC.
You don't.
But apparently you know more than the principal zEnterprise
architect
I don't have to run faster than the bear; I just have to run faster
than you.
In listserv%201008040744479311.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 08/04/2010
at 07:44 AM, Daniel McLaughlin daniel_mclaugh...@us.crawco.com
said:
The stump point is how do I IPL it?
You need an IODF and a LOADxx member.
Do I create a SYS1.IPLPARM on that pack
and go from there or what?
That would be my
m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com (Tom Marchant) writes:
More precisely, MVT had a single address space
aka VS2/SVS was minimally modified MVT in a single (16mbyte) virtual
address space; biggest change was borrowing ccwtrans from cp67 for EXCP
... to take the application-passed channel program and make
For new JCL I always recommend just putting an ample region size on the
job card and be done with it. But I would certainly not change running JCL
for no reason.
I always say if it ain't broke don't break it.
I say implement an IEFUSI exit that isn't from the dark ages and not
worry about (or
Does anyone know if there is any material from Steve Warren's BCPii Share
session on Tuesday? I have been monitoring the Share site in the hope that
something might appear, but no joy as yet.(many sessions do seem to have
the ppt's, but not that one).
I do now have a functioning basic BCPii
It will be in the proceedings soon
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Graham Harris harris...@gmail.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:04:10
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
