Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Barbara Nitz
Are there still problems known or is it generally considered safe to go to VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO)? We run 1.10, going to 1.11 soon. IPL your test system / sysplex with these options in your diag: Traps Name( IeaInitArSrb

Re: Product Suggestions

2010-11-01 Thread Timothy Sipples
Bernard Coeytaux writes: This product [SequeLink] is a TCP listener running on z/os that connect to db2 via RRSAF. The clienst must have the sequelink clients installed. It has many security features that DB2 didn't have BEFORE the new TRUSTED CONTEXT object in V9. Now you can try to play with the

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote in message news:listserv%201011010143572520.0...@bama.ua.edu... Are there still problems known or is it generally considered safe to go to VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO)? We run 1.10, going to 1.11 soon. IPL your test system / sysplex with these options in your

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Barbara Nitz
Thanks for the tip. However, I can't find any igvdgnpp proc. With Google I found an older version (for PSA traps), but I don't think this is the one you intend. Where did you find the JCL or can you show yours? Yes, the PSA one is the one. I don't remember where I originally copied it from, but

RMM UTC(YES) and Daylight Savings Time

2010-11-01 Thread SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Marco Torretta
Hello, We are working to migrate CA1 to RMM. We create the CDS with the EDGUTIL with the following parameters: CONTROL CDSID(SYS1) EXTENDEDBIN(YES) STACKEDVOLUME(YES) UTC(YES) + CATSYNC(YES) We are running in parallel from 6 months and all

D'oh

2010-11-01 Thread Shane Ginnane
I find John Gilmore's vocabulary most cromulent and it embiggins every thread in which it is used :-) o.k., so I just had to go google this. Obviously my television indoctrination is somewhat lacking. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: RMM UTC(YES) and Daylight Savings Time

2010-11-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
Where are you located? In the US the Daylight saving changes on Nov 6/7. Is yours earlier than ours? Or were you doing a test? Lizette Hello, We are working to migrate CA1 to RMM. We create the CDS with the EDGUTIL with the following parameters: CONTROL CDSID(SYS1) EXTENDEDBIN(YES)

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote in message news:listserv%201011010620067632.0...@bama.ua.edu... Thanks for the tip. However, I can't find any igvdgnpp proc. With Google I found an older version (for PSA traps), but I don't think this is the one you intend. Where did you find the JCL or can

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Barbara Nitz
Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said. The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And believe me, when I saw a PSA Furthermore, the mentioned traps are not in

LDAP

2010-11-01 Thread Ron Wells
Looking for install help on LDAP(TDS) Asked to setup LDAP on z/OS--1.11 Looking at manual--getting confused... Purpose is to extract info from RACF..few fields..NON-DB2...just a flat/seq file...be it OS or zFS file.. Any help would be appreciated...believe I have the samp files at hand..

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Bob Shannon
Of course they're not documented But they are listed in SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB). Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote in message news:listserv%201011010735061362.0...@bama.ua.edu... Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said. The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from share

Terminate LE enclave and proceed

2010-11-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I have an assembler (non-LE) program which calls a LE main-routine which creates an LE environment. It does not remove the LE enclave at termination (don't ask why). When the assembler routine gets back control it wishes to remove the enclave. There are the CEETREC and CEETREN routines, but they

Re: Terminate LE enclave and proceed

2010-11-01 Thread Steve Comstock
On 11/1/2010 7:22 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: I have an assembler (non-LE) program which calls a LE main-routine which creates an LE environment. It does not remove the LE enclave at termination (don't ask why). Yeah, but, how can we understand the environment you have? When the assembler

Re: RMM UTC(YES) and Daylight Savings Time

2010-11-01 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Europe changed this past weekend. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: RMM UTC(YES) and Daylight Savings Time Where are you located?

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com wrote in message news:58fc7f986fcb804286e23b59decf420f088a3...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware .com... Of course they're not documented But they are listed in SYS1.MODGEN(IGVDGNB). Bob Shannon Like George Orwell's pigs already said: all traps are

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Tony's FRONTIER account
It's part of my enjoyment of John Gilmore that many of his words have sent me to various web sites for definition. But now I just wish I knew how to squash the a and the e together. :-) - Original Message - From: john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com Newsgroups:

Re: Terminate LE enclave and proceed

2010-11-01 Thread Art Celestini
For anything non-trivial, I generally call CEEPIPI to setup and later take down the LE environment. It gives me the ability to pass an options string (e.g. TRAP(OFF) in debug mode), define my own routines for acquiring and releasing storage, etc. It's more work the first time but, like most

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
You can copy it from a word document after you insert it as a symbol and then paste it in your e-mail if your email server doesn't support symbols. Like this - æ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tony's FRONTIER account

Question about RDz 7.6 and RDz 7.6.2 Refresh Pack

2010-11-01 Thread Daniel Allen
We have RDz 7.6 installed on the z/OS server and Windows client. Is the RDz 7.6.2 Refresh Pack for the Windows client only ? Is there a portion for the z/OS server ?

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Blaicher, Chris
I am glad someone keeps us on our toes, language-wise, as John does, but I think there is a time and place for it. The original poster is obviously new to multi-tasking and the many problems that go with it, so why burden him with having to dig through a dictionary to know if what is being said

Re: Question about RDz 7.6 and RDz 7.6.2 Refresh Pack

2010-11-01 Thread Jousma, David
Maintenance for the z/OS part of RDz (HHOP760) is available from Shopz. I happen to get my maintenance from the RECEIVE ORDER command. I wish the z/OS part of RDz was included as part of the base, or at least orderable from shopz. Kinda a pain, to have to upload the SMPE files from the

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Blaicher, Chris chris_blaic...@bmc.comwrote: I am glad someone keeps us on our toes, language-wise, as John does, but I think there is a time and place for it. The original poster is obviously new to multi-tasking and the many problems that go with it, so why

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Richard L Peurifoy
On 11/1/2010 1:45 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote: Yes, CA are certainly BIG offenders in this game. Actually, we just ran into a key8 CSA thing with datacom - you cannot change the XCF MUF group name without it. Even after IPL they do not come up. We've had pretty good luck getting CA to correct these

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Bill Fairchild
I be diggin' my man John's words too. He don't be lunchin'. He be keepin' it real. Word. Bill Fairchild Rocket Software -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tony's FRONTIER account Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 9:25 AM

Re: Diag traps, was: Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

2010-11-01 Thread Mike Schwab
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote: Yes, this is the JCL I found, but this only targets some PSA areas and not with x'FF' and x'4F' as you said. The FF and 4F come from the DIAG traps. And I think I copied the JCL from share presentation 'bit bucket 29'. And

Re: DFDSS QUESTION - RECEIVING ERROR MESSAGE ADR410E

2010-11-01 Thread willie bunter
Lizette,   Sorry for the long delay in answering your question.  The gdg base is being held by the STC CMN2STAR.  I waited for the STC to shutdown and I was able to move the dsn.   Of late, when I make a post it doesn't appear right away.  There could be a problem with my Yahoo account.   

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
There's a lot to be said for vocabulary enhancement. I'm tired of hearing that everything must be written for a 5th grade level audience. What ever happened to 'look it up'? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Fairchild

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Mike Schwab
I like the US-English-International Keyboard setting on Windows / Linux. Once you set this setting, when you type the first combineable character, it is not echoed to the screen until the next character is typed. If the combination is one character, the combined character will be sent, otherwise

Re: DFDSS QUESTION - RECEIVING ERROR MESSAGE ADR410E

2010-11-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
-Original Message- From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com Sent: Nov 1, 2010 11:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFDSS QUESTION - RECEIVING ERROR MESSAGE ADR410E Lizette, Sorry for the long delay in answering your question. The gdg base is being held by the STC CMN2STAR.

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Harminc
On 31 October 2010 12:59, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote: One of the chief uses of a subtask is to delegate to it a function that is in some sense perilous, may fail/ABEND.  Such a subtask ABEND leaves the parent task alive in circumstances that would have killed it if it had

New(ish) redbook on z196

2010-11-01 Thread McKown, John
Sorry if I'm reposting something that was already posted. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg247833.html?Open quote The zEnterprise System consists of the IBM zEnterprise 196 central processor complex, IBM zEnterprise Unified Resource Manager, and IBM zEnterprise

Re: The replication feature.

2010-11-01 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- A few words on replication. The standard replication is sending CCWS to all controller which have mirrors disks. Sometime controller send data to other controller to sync the data between all of them. In this

Re: LDAP

2010-11-01 Thread John McKown
Does the data need to be real-time? If not, have you considered using IRRDBU00 to unload the RACF database to a sequential file? -- John McKown Maranatha! Sent from my Vibrant Android phone. On Nov 1, 2010 7:44 AM, Ron Wells rwe...@agfinance.com wrote: Looking for install help on LDAP(TDS)

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
There's a lot to be said for vocabulary enhancement. Yes, but there is a lot to be said for communicating. I'm tired of hearing that everything must be written for a 5th grade level audience. There's a reason for that. Most people are lucky if they can read at that high of a level. What ever

Re: LDAP

2010-11-01 Thread Ron Wells
from what I gather the ldap will be queried ? for information.like userid/name ..at least what I have been told... not familiar with irrdbu00 .. From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 11/01/2010 02:31 PM Subject:Re: LDAP Sent by:

Re: Product Suggestions

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Harminc
On 27 October 2010 13:46, August Carideo august.cari...@avon.com wrote: Any suggestions from the list for replacements of the below listed products would be appreciated Beta Systems Software, where I work, has products that are a good fit in some of these cases. As is so often the case, the

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- There's a lot to be said for vocabulary enhancement. I'm tired of hearing that everything must be written for a 5th grade level audience. What ever happened to 'look it up'?

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread McKown, John
I agree that in general conversation, a person needs to communicate to the listener at the listener's level. But this is supposed to be, and on occasion is, a technical forum. Granted, that does not mean use obscure words that are not generally in use. But there does need to be some level of

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:41 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: I agree that in general conversation, a person needs to communicate to the listener at the listener's level. But this is supposed to be, and on occasion is, a technical forum. Granted, that does not mean use

Re: USS umask in batch?

2010-11-01 Thread zMan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:33 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: Please define in batch. What are you running to get UNIX services going? Or are you just calling some BPX* program from your program and letting things default? /etc/profile and $HOME/.profile are only used by

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote: Many repliers have emphasized clarity and precision. Although Mr. Gilmore's word choice is sometimes arcane and obscure, nevertheless his words under attack were not big or complex words; e.g., ætat, having only five

USS umask in batch?

2010-11-01 Thread zMan
I can't seem to get my batch umask to be anything other than 022. I've changed it in /etc/profile and in $HOME/.profile and it's still 022. -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Share

2010-11-01 Thread Ron Wells
Anyone know Reg Fee for share...member vs non-member ?? ball park will work.. -- Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This

Re: Question about RDz 7.6 and RDz 7.6.2 Refresh Pack

2010-11-01 Thread Daniel Allen
On IBMLink, I found the following PTFs: UK53000, UK54177, UK57122, UK57126 and UK57130. Are there more? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Re: Share

2010-11-01 Thread Williamson, James R
Sorry about the formatting. http://www.share.org/Events/UpcomingConference/RegistrationRates/tabid/200/Default.aspx Early Registration Regular Registration (on or before January 14, 2011)

Re: Question about RDz 7.6 and RDz 7.6.2 Refresh Pack

2010-11-01 Thread Doug Henry
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:07:36 -0700, Daniel Allen dal...@serena.com wrote: On IBMLink, I found the following PTFs: UK53000, UK54177, UK57122, UK57126 and UK57130. Are there more? No this is the current list. I just ran a receive order and verify it. Doug

Re: USS umask in batch?

2010-11-01 Thread McKown, John
Please define in batch. What are you running to get UNIX services going? Or are you just calling some BPX* program from your program and letting things default? /etc/profile and $HOME/.profile are only used by the UNIX /bin/sh program and then only when it is a login shell. -- John McKown

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Bill Fairchild
Many repliers have emphasized clarity and precision. Although Mr. Gilmore's word choice is sometimes arcane and obscure, nevertheless his words under attack were not big or complex words; e.g., ætat, having only five letters, cannot possibly be characterized as big, and its meaning is

Re: New(ish) redbook on z196

2010-11-01 Thread Scott Rowe
I don't know if it's been posted before, but I downloaded the pdf on 7/23. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.comwrote: Sorry if I'm reposting something that was already posted. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg247833.html?Open

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

2010-11-01 Thread Doug Henry
If you do not have UID(0) then you also need read access to BPX.FILEATTR.PROGCTL BPX.FILEATTR.APF and BPX.FILEATTR.SHARELIB. These are particulary nasty ones because SMP/E will finish with a 0 return code but you will break the product and you will not have a clue of what's wrong. An example

Re: USS umask in batch?

2010-11-01 Thread Steve Comstock
On 11/1/2010 2:51 PM, zMan wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:33 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: Please define in batch. What are you running to get UNIX services going? Or are you just calling some BPX* program from your program and letting things default? /etc/profile and

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

2010-11-01 Thread Mark Zelden
A more common example (and well documented within the product) is Java. The installer must have those attributes if they aren't running as UID(0). Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net

Any one have a solution for this

2010-11-01 Thread Petersen, Jim
We are using Data Domain for VTL. What we have found is that even though a tape goes scratch in our Tape Library Manager, the space is still in use for that Scratch Tape on the Data Domain. Has anyone else experienced this problem and how did you solve it?

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread john gilmore
I do in fact give some thought to the needs of participants who are not native speakers of English, and with some of them I sometimes have clarifying offline exchanges in one of the other languages that I know well. Vocabulary, as measured by one of the standard intelligence scales, has

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
ætat, having only five letters, cannot possibly be characterized as big, and its meaning is instantly obvious given a knowledge of Latin roots, as was lacunae, also not a big word. Speaking of precision, I said large/obscure, not big. Nor did he describe the OP as naïve. He said that the OP

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote: snip In second languages, however, things are very different. There is an important sense in which the notionally difficult words are the same in every language. A Russian may, for example, have a small English

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Bill Fairchild
Yes, you did write large/obscure. You diligently reread your post until you came to the word that proved me wrong. But you should have continued reading the next paragraph in order also to be thorough, since there you also this: And, using those big words to answer the OP, did not solve the

Re: USS umask in batch?

2010-11-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:24:34 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: In my software I use bpx1opn and set the mode bits in a constant and it comes out just fine without worrying about umask. Grrr... Read what you quoted: apply to BPXBATCH. Maybe I need to just call umask from the program -- that just

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Steve Comstock
On 11/1/2010 2:35 PM, Bill Fairchild wrote: Many repliers have emphasized clarity and precision. Although Mr. Gilmore's word choice is sometimes arcane and obscure, nevertheless his words under attack were not big or complex words; e.g., ætat, having only five letters, cannot possibly be

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
You chose to assume Mr. Gilmore meant naïve as an insult; I chose to assume he meant inexperienced. Speaking of precision. Novice is inexperience. Naive is lack of understanding. If one goes looking for insults, one can usually find them. Naive is insulting; I didn't have to hunt for it.

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Bill Fairchild
John Gilmore wrote I remember going astray, ætat 4 or 5 in a later post on this now seriously OT thread. You're right about the OP's questions being radically naïf. I suffered a multi-bit memory check. My email editor inserts diaereses often without my knowing it, which is not always to my

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 20:35 + on 11/01/2010, Bill Fairchild wrote about Re: ATTACH: be sure that your post is just as clear and precise as you wish his had been. Were it not for Mr. Gilmore's predilection for precise meanings, I would still be ignorant of the words antipode and boustrophedon (the latter of

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 12:05 -0500 on 11/01/2010, Mike Schwab wrote about Re: ATTACH: I like the US-English-International Keyboard setting on Windows / Linux. Once you set this setting, when you type the first combineable character, it is not echoed to the screen until the next character is typed. If the

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:56:12 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: Nor did he describe the OP as naïve. He said that the OP was a naïf. No. He said: They are radically naif., speaking of the OP's questions. These two words are not synonymous. Naïve is an adjective and naïf is a noun, as he used

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:56:12 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: snip And no one has until now taken Mr. Gilmore to task for disingenuously (in my perception) pouncing upon Sam Siegel's typo. I suppose there must be a

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread Steve Comstock
On 11/1/2010 6:31 PM, Sam Siegel wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Paul Gilmartinpaulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:56:12 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: snip And no one has until now taken Mr. Gilmore to task for disingenuously (in my perception) pouncing upon Sam

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread john gilmore
I will refrain from pouncing on Steve Comstock for misspelling 'Murphy'. He may well have done it disingenuously. I am grateful to those who defended my post, and I will venture a further comment. Too much attention was devoted to manner as opposed to matter in the posts that were

Re: The replication feature.

2010-11-01 Thread shai hess
Yes, I know it and I support it. But be aware that I can not see the result of the READ_COUNT because I take control before the IO is really done to the real device. Shai On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:

Re: New(ish) redbook on z196

2010-11-01 Thread Terry Draper
The July copy was a draft version. The final version was published on 15th October. I suggest you download the final version.   Terry Draper zSeries Performance Consultant w...@btopenworld.com mobile:  +66 811431287 --- On Mon, 1/11/10, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote: From: Scott Rowe

Re: Any one have a solution for this

2010-11-01 Thread Steve Arnett
Jim, Technically, this is not a problem. If you had real physical tapes, then the data would be available until the tape was overwritten. Several VTS vendors provide this feature for compatibility purposes. -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-01 Thread J R
I will refrain from pouncing on Bill Fairchild for the redundancy of from thence. Doh! ;-) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:35:48 + From: bi...@mainstar.com Subject: Re: ATTACH To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Many repliers have emphasized clarity and precision. Although Mr. Gilmore's word

Re: Any one have a solution for this

2010-11-01 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:33:32 -0500, Petersen, Jim wrote: We are using Data Domain for VTL. What we have found is that even though a tape goes scratch in our Tape Library Manager, the space is still in use for that Scratch Tape on the Data Domain. Has anyone else experienced this problem and