jacked up the fee (four-fold if I
remember).
Basically lost the case, and got $1 in damages I think.
I though it had sent Bristol to the wall, but I see on the home page
that HP brought them out earlier this year.
Shane
tell them that...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
IEAEYEBALL.
IBM included - would have gotten nailed by LE a couple of releases back
if I hadn't checked.
For the rest of the post, agree wholeheartedly.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
to the business, do it.
From my point of view, this functionality seems to be demanded by (and
benefit to) the big end of town.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
had a play with the (RMF) CIM data yet ???. When I first looked
at it I didn't have access to a system at the appropriate level.
Still on my gotta try this one day list.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
should be smart enough to know it
has nothing at all to do with running SUB=MSTR.
ISV are *always* up to no good ... :0)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
the extra processors (in the LPAR) ???.
Shane ... :confused:
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 08:10 +1000, Shane wrote:
That 703 reference makes no sense at all to me.
Aahhh - o.k., now I get it.
Amazing the clarity that first dose of caffeine of the morning
engenders.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
you are being
impacted by short engines. Doesn't help if you hit the roof on the new
engines, but I'd think that unlikely.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:18 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote:
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
M - must be that time of year again for a(nother) microkernel vs.
monolithic flame-fest.
Shane
?
... but you're not prepared to do a refresh yourself to find this out.
?
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
into the minix3 site - what goes around comes
around. Kernel is around 4000 lines - IP and X included.
Will have to give it a go, just for the experience.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
.
Tsk, tsk Bruce - you don't have a minimal proc to enable a panic
logon ???.
Shame on you ... ;0)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
Just got the isource notification.
IBM is really churning stuff these days it seems.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
don't like having to junk their
investments every couple of years.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
be getting too pedantic :-)
/snip
Yep generally agree, but you'd have to say that Walt is sailing pretty
darn close with that ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and I didn't know a soul by face.
Mind you, I got to meet a few people I *really* didn't know ;-)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
become somewhat enamoured of perl of late. Must get a copy onto
big iron one day so I can have a play.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
to be a customer. I do work for some of IBMs
customers, but I ain't actually an employee of one.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 07:54 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
You probably can't see it in the picture, but I
have a pony tail which makes me pretty easy to pick out.
Glad you weren't standing next to Barry when I was looking for people I
(sorta) knew ... ;-)
Shane
support) maybe it could run IBMs new
(no so) super secret emulator and support a decent operating system.
If not, maybe IBM could drop along to one of Jays sessions at Share
about ... er, um, ...
A - then again, maybe not.
Shane
III will report on it, which to me says same sysplex. Haven't had
the opportunity to look for myself yet though ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
(in
the group) suffers.
What are you looking for - an ability to hard cap particular LPAR(s) (as
a member of a capacity group) ???.
Sounds reasonable to me - why don't you raise a requirement ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
to their senses with
pricing model. Maybe even they recognise the goose has been all but
strangled.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
but dream ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
) USS, er *nix-ish filesystems (initially).
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 16:37 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Does anyone here besides me perceive an aching need for a Rexx-friendly
flavor of the SMP/E API?
Maybe it was looked at and tossed in the too hard basket.
Using that particular API is seriously ugly.
Shane
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 09:10 +1000, I wrote:
... if I take the
RMF data from such a system and run it through z/OS 1.7 RMF, I start to
see some (potentially) useful zIIP eligible numbers.
And I should know better than to post from home without checking.
Ignore the above.
Shane
a good one for Walt and his people ...
or a decent sized customer ...
Maybe a bank ;o)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 11:37 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
I am starting to get dizzy from all the times I've added/changed/removed
MCCAFCTH since 64-bit came along in OS/390 2.10. :-)
Oh I don't know - I reckon CPENABLE still gets my Groundhog Day
nomination.
Shane
(discernable) damage to the 'plex
either.
Observation only, not advice.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
intrigues me is - what happens when the dongles expire ???. Yearly
license and all.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Anyone else detect a smidgen if annoyance in Barbs post ???.
A customer being pissed off with the apathy of Catalog support.
How unusual ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
is asking
for too much.
There is any alternate suggestion for this approach?
Don't.
A wait state is the most likely (and best) outcome.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
vary CHPIDs offline
from the hardware if it is possible to do so from the operating system.
Even the Engineers are paranoid about this - rightly so IMHO.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
a similar response, but discarded it.
My immediate response to Johns Mc's post was go the judge !!!.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
exposures I guess - especially on big volumes.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
is dumped.
This is (primarily) what I was referring to in my earlier post. Bigger
volumes exacerbate this exposure.
Can be accommodated but takes some planning.
Mumble .. grumble .. mutter ... I'm starting to sound like Shane ...
grumble ... mutter ... ;-)
And a merry Christmas to you too
Christmas to
OZ! Ready to do a little more water skiing, my dear? Must be rough. ;-)
Not bloody likely !!!
I wouldn't wear one of those stupid hats in a fit ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 16:54 -0600, Brian Peterson wrote:
when I tried to download service using RECEIVE ORDER. Job ended RC=8, due
to syntax error in the HOLDDATA file. I thought, Huh?.
Cute, very cute.
Look at the time on Brians post !!!.
Man, I hope they are paying you plenty.
Shane
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 23:33 -0800, Gibney, Dave wrote:
... or you broke it on some occasion or other :)
Or both vbg and maybe on purpose mbG)
Nope - anyone smart enough to break it, wouldn't have been so stoopid as
to do it deliberately.
Then again ...
And here I was thinking Dave may be going to drop some pearl of wisdom -
say the critical half dozen or so lines of code that constitute a
bedugger ... ;o)
BTW, in all fairness to Binyamin, I think you should the get attribution
correct.
Shane
favorite flame mechanism. I'd suggest a RCF.
I was in the process of testing for Radoslaw when this post came in.
Given your admission above, why does it even need a bloody RCF ???.
Sorry mate, not acceptable.
Shane
Contention ?
Ideally speaking if CPU Usage is not 100% then there should not be CPU
Contention.
Like Rick, I too am interested in which report (and data) you are basing
this on.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
the best.
No contest.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
(DFS).
Pretty quick and seamless cutover in the sandpit - the real world will
convert in time now 1.7 is fully deployed.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:41 -0600, Dave Kopischke wrote:
I thought the highest you can go on z/OS is 1.4 on a non-64-bit machine ???
1.5.
I have it on an MP3K still idling away in the office - no DB2 V8, so
no-one's interested in it any more.
Shane
rubbed the wrong way by Timothy spouting the
company line. Especially those of us that have customers deserting the
platform.
But he does offer a different perspective.
Maybe the new age has arrived. I just hope it can keep us all (me in
particular) in the business.
Shane
unmolested (because it never hit UTL
for CPU expiration) - user batch got unilaterally cancelled if it was in
the wrong class and used too much CPU for the performance profile it was
designated.
Complaints were curtly dealt with. Rules is rules ...
Shane
, but couldn't find it documented at
the time.
Cheers ... Shane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
for problems initially.
Here's a vote for XCF - if you haven't done GRS setup before, it'll
probably be *much* easier to get your head around XCF rather than GRS
CTC.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
distributions have any
relation to the count of installed systems ???.
I'd be contending not based on my experience.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
as unloading the module, maybe not.
I'm well aware of the difference between Linux and a Linux distribution.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
- with at least one having
two logical engines defined. Makes for a bad logical~physical ratio.
So ... as the others have said, get the number of MVS LPARs down.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
on Wintel: a wonderful topic to take up with me at SCIDS.
Seems that could make for an interesting beer or two.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
) region problems due to ECSA
(over-)allocations.
And it will continue to happen, even in this 64-bit world.
However, I must admit I don't see the point in playing nickel and dime
with the common page dataset.
Disk is cheap - just over allocate it and forget about it.
Shane
(dedicated) CF engines.
And yes, people still consider it an option.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
assuming we should
allow for growth.
Always pays to drift to the conservative side when looking at things
that needs an outage to fix.
Personally I wouldn't be making it any smaller. If push comes to shove
later, tweak it some more then.
Shane
unless you restart DB2 regions on Prod during peak
load.
Not very likely.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 22:02 +0100, Schiradin,Roland wrote:
Not sure about SETUP.SH but we set the JAVA_HOME in /etc/profile
As do we.
Useful for setting up the PATH if the Java version is also changing.
Shane ...
--
For IBM
downloadable, but
(later ???) the SMP packaged version needed to be ordered. Too long ago
to remember exactly I'm afraid. For us the 64-bit had to be
specifically added to the 1.7 order.
BTW, those echo and export (and similar) commands need tobe in lower
case. Obvious I know, but ...
Shane
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:05 -0800, Carl Edwards wrote:
Amazing how easy it is once you know how
Here's another easy solution - just recat them and delete them as
normal.
Can all be done from ISPF unless there are already catalog entries for
the same.
Shane
, open, ...
See recent (ongoing ???) thread.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
So - take some IP from the old Amdahl days, get a start-up going, and
wait for IBM to throw (presumably) large buckets of money at you to
acquire the company.
Maybe there's hope for the PSI folks yet ... :0)
Shane ...
(no Ed, them other ones
don't get the choice.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
to your
data in transit.
Shane ...
(awesome album - and album cover ...)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 10:50 +0100, Chris Mason wrote:
Am I somehow alone or is LookAt down for everybody?
I've always been a bit ho-hum re LookAt. Probably spoilt by QuickRef.
I go straight to the the manual(s) rather than LookAt.
And yes, it appears to be down.
Shane
bloody laughable.
At least ServiceLink seems to still be there - for now.
Pity about the public face of zSeries.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
of
course.
JES2 (nowadays) is remarkedly robust I've found.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
a revelation :)
I can't imagine you'd have any problem convincing some-one to give you a
price.
I think we have our MP3K on parts and materials - don't know what it
costs, but it never needs attention anyway.
As for new kit, if you believe Timothy, IBM are almost giving it away.
Shane
them ring me before replying I - in any
circumstances.
I'll make no comment in the local fix.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
pretend to understand IBMs pricing regimes.
Maybe the safest way to accomplish what (I think) you are trying to do
is capacity groups. See the z/OS 1.8 announcement letter.
I haven't had the opportunity to try it yet as I don't have access to a
1.8 system.
Shane
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:08 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I have problems with Book Server due to conflicting JAVA versions.
Now there's a surprise - say it ain't so ...
Sorry, can't help as I refuse to use it.
Shane
), but also to
a group of LPs running on the same server, called a capacity group.
S
Anyone with 1.8 like to chime in ???.
I am happy to stand corrected.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
by corporate fiats. This
produces some *really* inappropriate (SMP) packaging.
As to the original subject, nothing to contribute as I've never been
responsible for a site using RMM.
Yep - an indication of how CA1 owned this segment of the market
previously.
Shane
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:52 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote:
JAVA or BookMangler ?? :-)
Yes.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
in need) were on
the Shopz site as well as in the jobs themselves.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
nowadays anyway.
Each to their own.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
mentioned you had left - I wonder why.
Good luck with whatever you're doing now.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:19 -0700, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I'm curious: assuming you're running an FTP client on the host to
download, can't you simply do a RECEIVE FROMNETWORK?
The choice is not always mine to make.
Shane
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:20 -0500, Ed Finnell wrote:
Wonder if it's correlated to today's announcements?
Limited to locales close to North America only fella ...
What about the rest of us ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
new, and move everything into
the new box.
Same serial number.
For contingency I had defined a new CF so things could be set up in
advance.
Subsequently, the third CF ghost was always with us until the 'plex
was finally dismantled completely.
Learn to live with it Kees.
Shane
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:06 +, Phil Payne wrote:
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/T3Feb13.pdf
404 Phil ???.
The beaks got to you already ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
a couple of presentations at Share -
have a look there.
One was by a Mark (Brooks ???) - he seemed to have some idea of what he
speaking about ... :o)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 07:26 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
It's visible from Chicago
Yeah, he finally got his act together ...
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 11:03 -0500, Ed Finnell wrote:
I'll dig around, all I know is where it isn't. Speaking for Eric???
So Ed, now that you mention it, how is Eric these days ??? :0)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
was reminiscent of days gone by.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 09:26 +0100, Birger Heede wrote:
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/lum/
You looking for a z/OS port?
Nope.
ILM was an unmitigated bloody disaster.
Somehow I can't see all the ISVs trusting their entire (z/OS) income to
Tivoli.
Shane
to get okay'ed ???.
- stop all updates, switch to batch mode, re-cycle. Huh ??? See comment
above.
- unpack the XMIT'd load module, copy to running system(s) ...
I have one customer that I do all of the above (and more) for.
Telling the customer to swap out these products is not an option.
Shane
of the above applies today.
Shane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Am I a little harsh? Perhaps.
Sounds suspiciously like platitude to me.
Being patronising to customers with broken systems is rarely
appreciated. Vendors with visions of forward sales would do well to be
cognisant of this.
Shane
.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
have been even more enlightening to have been a fly
on the wall at IBM.
And yep, we'd probably all like FBA support to have been taken up.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
be just the boy - right guy, right
place, right time.
Greg, are you listening ... ;-)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
.
I re-ordered and demanded 3490 so they might put some thought into it.
And they expect payment for (so called) support - sheesh.
There is also issues with getting holes punched in firewalls. My latest
attempt to download MXG failed as Barry now seems to use a different IP
than last time.
Shane
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 06:38 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
Dumb question: does IBM only distribute various fixes electronically, or can
you get an entire newly-ordered product via the Internet?
Depends on where you are.
Shane
your services
fella :o)
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
Any horror stories out there?
The rest of the world deals with this on a regular basis.
Enough of the Chicken Little syndrome from the yanks already.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
changed before it was noticed.
Happened again a few weeks later - different shift, different people.
Damn.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
201 - 300 of 1201 matches
Mail list logo
