On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:32, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
Flynn is dead. TRON is dead. *LONG LIVE THE MCP!*
I am sure Unisys would be glad to see that sentiment expressed on an IBM
forum. :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN
The offset in a BRC is relative to the instruction, whether it is executed
directly or by EX, so you cannot easily execute it out of line without
recalculating the offset or simulating execution. It is easier to restore
the instruction and execute inline.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 17:32, Tony
We simply issue the appropriate SET TIMEZONE or SET CLOCK command on the
appropriate day on the machines, and have not had problems for years. These
commands do not change the TOD clock, and none of our software is sensitive
to the local time.
(We do follow up with a change to the CLOCKxx
That raises a question. Why is there no way to pre-define the time zone
offsets and boundaries in z/OS? You can do it easily in z/VM, z/VSE and, of
course, Linux. Why not z/OS?
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 09:11, Sam Golob sbgo...@cbttape.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
CBT Tape File 639 from Hunter
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:17, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
z/VM? Enlighten me. Last I looked, if I performed a SENDFILE
the Friday before the DST change and received it the Monday after,
the restored time stamp was an hour off. Likewise the times
shown by the CP DISPLAY
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 14:12, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Did you imply in your previoust that z/VM requires an IPL? z/OS
does better than that (at least if you have ETR/STP).
No, it does not require it. You can change the time zone with a a command,
but when you do need to
Do you have any exits that allocate datasets?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 07:03, Carroll, William carro...@grangeinsurance.com
wrote:
Good morning all. I have a problem I would like to put out here and see if
anybody else has seen it. The last couple of days I am having a batch job
issue the
Just to complete the options list -
You can also read the members using QSAM in the case of dynamically
determined or multiple members. You can use RDJFCB to get the JFCB, insert
the member name, and use OPEN TYPE=J. To process another member, close the
file, update the JFCB and re-open it.
Did you install the exits in SYSTSO?
SYSTSO.IEFU83
SYSTSO.IEFU84
SYSTSO.IEFU85
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:59, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
I've got an exit that installs on SYS.IEFU83, 4 and 5. On my test system
and
several customer systems it works as expected. However, on one
No, that alone will not fix the problem. TSO exits are already getting type
30 and 80.
You need to add your exit to the dynamic exit list for each subsystem you
want to monitor.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 14:32, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Perhaps I need an explicit
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
Of Brian Kennelly
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMF Exit suppression question
Did you install the exits in SYSTSO?
SYSTSO.IEFU83
SYSTSO.IEFU84
assume that you could substitute JES2 or STC for TSO in the
descriptions above?
Thanks again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
Of Brian Kennelly
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Here is the relevant documentation from the *Installation and Tuning
Reference*:
The SUBSYS specification overrides the SYS specification. Use SUBSYS to make
exceptions to your SYS specification for particular subsystems.
...
When you associate new exit routines with SMF exits through PROGxx
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 15:53, Tabor, Rich richard.ta...@usairways.comwrote:
The short answer I think is yes - yes it is TWS's fault. Yes, as
suggested, if I specify the absolute GDG data set name in the JCL, I see
only the enqueue for the absolute GDG data set and no enqueue for the GDG
STCK D2(B2) [S]
| 'B205' | B2 | D2 |
||||
016 20 31
The current value of bits 0-63 of the TOD clock is stored in the eight-byte
field designated by the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:25, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Rexx has a few others, but they're conveniences, like the number of
days this year -- I don't really consider that a date format, though
it's useful sometimes.
That is actually a very import format, as well as the full format
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:42, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, days this year can be useful, but does anyone store dates as
days so far in the year? It's basically the Julian date without
the year.
Yes, they do. I worked on a data conversion product a few years ago for a
software
I have not tried it with your scenario, but what about using an IEFBR14 JCL
step with UNIT=(3490,DEFER)? That would allow you to use a referback, but
not require a mount.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 13:49, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:36:38 -0500, Field, Alan
18 matches
Mail list logo
