Re: Z10 and ICSF
I have to ask, did you run the PSP bucket for z10? We just went through this upgrade, and the list was pretty long, and included ICSF maintenance. ___ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President Mainframe Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 616.653.8429 This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Z10 and ICSF
The strange thing is that that: 1. The same csfprmxx worked ok on the Z9 2. While trying to solve the problem we deleted the domains on all LPARS except the production one and allowd only domain 0 for this LPAR and still after activate we got the S0C4. Magen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Z10 and ICSF
Hi List Yestarday night we did a CPC migration from Z9 to Z10. After we IPLed on the new CPC we had a problem with the ICSF proc - CSFSTART (abend 0C4-4). After a while we have managed to start the proc after adding parameter: Domain(1) into the csfparms member. but we can't understand why... The same procedure (without the parm) worked ok on the Z9 system. We know that this parameter has a relation to the LPAR crypto domain index under the activation profile but can't fully understand what the relations are... Does anybody know? Thanks Magen -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Z10 and ICSF
Magen Margalit wrote: Hi List Yestarday night we did a CPC migration from Z9 to Z10. After we IPLed on the new CPC we had a problem with the ICSF proc - CSFSTART (abend 0C4-4). After a while we have managed to start the proc after adding parameter: Domain(1) into the csfparms member. but we can't understand why... The same procedure (without the parm) worked ok on the Z9 system. We know that this parameter has a relation to the LPAR crypto domain index under the activation profile but can't fully understand what the relations are... Does anybody know? Thanks Magen It sounds like the lpar definition for the crypto resources specifies more than one cryptographic domain. That is valid, but if you do specify more than one domain the icsf parmlib member must specify which one to use. I would have expected ICSF to give an error message and not take an abend however. -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL Progress doesn't come from early risers - progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things. Robert A. Heinlein - Time Enought for Love(1973) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Z10 and ICSF
Mark is right, it does sound like the LPAR has multiple Domains configured, but I would have expected ICSF to issue CSFM409E 'Multiple Domains Available Select One in Options Data Set', not an Abend. You should probably open a problem with the Support Center to get to the bottom of the problem. Greg Boyd IBM WSC, System z Crypto On Fri, 9 May 2008 11:43:05 -0400, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Magen Margalit wrote: Hi List Yestarday night we did a CPC migration from Z9 to Z10. After we IPLed on the new CPC we had a problem with the ICSF proc - CSFSTART (abend 0C4-4). After a while we have managed to start the proc after adding parameter: Domain(1) into the csfparms member. but we can't understand why... The same procedure (without the parm) worked ok on the Z9 system. We know that this parameter has a relation to the LPAR crypto domain index under the activation profile but can't fully understand what the relations are... Does anybody know? Thanks Magen It sounds like the lpar definition for the crypto resources specifies more than one cryptographic domain. That is valid, but if you do specify more than one domain the icsf parmlib member must specify which one to use. I would have expected ICSF to give an error message and not take an abend however. -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL Progress doesn't come from early risers - progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things. Robert A. Heinlein - Time Enought for Love(1973) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
