Re: [Fwd: Re: date formats]

2010-08-16 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 4:56 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: date formats] > > In <1281901

Re: [Fwd: Re: date formats]

2010-08-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <1281901727.14657.141.ca...@mckown5.johnmckown.net>, on 08/15/2010 at 02:48 PM, John McKown said: >Believe it or not, our 20xx dates are encoded x'9A001' for 2000, Which would imply that you had to track down every program that did arithmetic on dates. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,

Re: [Fwd: Re: date formats]

2010-08-15 Thread Mike Schwab
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:48 PM, John McKown wrote: > > Believe it or not, our 20xx dates are encoded x'9A001' for 2000, and so > on up the alphabet. I wasn't in on this, so I don't know where it > terminates. But x'9F' is the max - 2015. So the world better end in > 2012! > x'90' 1990 x'9a' 2000

[Fwd: Re: date formats]

2010-08-15 Thread John McKown
Forwarded Message From: John McKown Subject: Re: date formats Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:27:39 -0500 On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 08:23 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > In , on 08/13/2010 >at 05:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: > > >I'll agree enthusiastically except where the