Hi.
It is my recollection that when MVS/XA first came out the usual suspect
group of non-VSAM I/O macors (GET/PUT/READ/WRITE/CHECK etc.)
could not be issued when AMODE was 31.
Now-a-daze AMODE can be 31 when issuing these macros, and
this has been the case for years.
My question for those with
Hi Greg,
OPEN/CLOSE support AMODE 31 since DFP 2.3 (FMID HDP2230)
PUT/GET support AMODE 31 since DFSMS 1.1 (FMID JDZ1110).
This was the first release of DFSMS.
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:41:59 +1100 Greg Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:It is my recollection that when MVS/XA first came out the usual suspect
:group of non-VSAM I/O macors (GET/PUT/READ/WRITE/CHECK etc.)
:could not be issued when AMODE was 31.
:Now-a-daze AMODE can be 31 when issuing these
Roland Schiradin wrote:
Hi Greg,
OPEN/CLOSE support AMODE 31 since DFP 2.3 (FMID HDP2230)
PUT/GET support AMODE 31 since DFSMS 1.1 (FMID JDZ1110).
This was the first release of DFSMS.
Roland
Hmm, that would seem to put the non-SVC macro upgrade around
the SP4.3 to SP5.1 time frame.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:28:59 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
When the GET/PUT macro was changed from an L to an SLR/ICM pair.
I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
maintaining the restriction that the control blocks referenced
must reside below the Line?
sigh We're
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
maintaining the restriction that the control blocks referenced
must reside below the Line?
All control blocks pointed to by other control blocks via 24-bit
pointers must be below 16MB.
--
Edward E Jaffe
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:27:40 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:28:59 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:When the GET/PUT macro was changed from an L to an SLR/ICM pair.
:I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
:maintaining the restriction that
In a message dated 12/6/2007 5:29:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know how much, if any, of the underlying code had problems.
I remember changing the region size for IDCAMS and LKED with XA 'cause they
had been 'fixed'.
I am pretty sure that the zLinux stuff supports above the bar.
zLinux does not have neither a bar nor a line, does it? No need
for it; there simply is no legacy AMODE24 code which needs
compatibility support.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
9 matches
Mail list logo
