Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote in message
news:5715402586594249.wa.nitzibmgmx@bama.ua.edu...
Just to add my speculations to this, too:
For some reason they have excluded SMF records with that subsys.
From the other posts, it is a user-defined SMF type number. The reason
for
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
If an application needs one of them [ ... subsystem ...] like in IEFSSN, you
need to specify that one,
It depends on the product. I know of some third party products which are using
'hooks' to establish a subsystem, for them there is no need to bother with
Topical: Just yesterday a colleague and I were discussing a user-defined
(not SSI) subsystem - SILO - that a customer appears to have. You can
guess (as I did) the origin of the subsystem. Anyone know anything about
the subsystem? For some reason they have excluded SMF records with that
: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Martin Packer
Sent: 05 January 2012 11:06
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Was: Calling all experts on SMFPRMxx SUBSYS - How
Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com wrote in message
news:of81a0b4c6.95d34f88-on8025797c.002b1874-8025797c.003d0...@uk.ibm.c
om...
Topical: Just yesterday a colleague and I were discussing a
user-defined
(not SSI) subsystem - SILO - that a customer appears to have. You can
guess (as I did)
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:
Topical: Just yesterday a colleague and I were discussing a user-defined
(not SSI) subsystem - SILO - that a customer appears to have. You can
guess (as I did) the origin of the subsystem. Anyone know anything about
Just to add my speculations to this, too:
For some reason they have excluded SMF records with that subsys.
From the other posts, it is a user-defined SMF type number. The reason for
exclusion is probably just that these types didn't exist when the TYPE
statement was written in SMFPRM. Are
7 matches
Mail list logo
