I am not a high-level assembler programmer?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pedantic Tape Analyzer?
Paul Gilmartin
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Can this be written in Rexx? IANASP. IANAHLASMP.
Ok, you've got me in a corner in a round room... :)
What are these acronyms actually?
I think the first one is : I Am Not A System Programmer.
TIA!
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
---
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Lately, examining a dump of a tape output from SAS TAPECOPY,
I noticed that the volser in the HDR1 records did not match
the volser in the VOL1 record. OK. IBM doc says this field
is defined but not verified by OPEN/CLOSE processing, etc.
But I'm working on a utility of m
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:08:20 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>
>I think you can do all you are trying to do with REXX as long as you are
>specifying RECFM=U. You will have some fun handling all of this.
>
Alas, EXECIO won't do RECFM=U. So I try LMGET. LMGET won't do tape.
(Or will it? Am I missing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 7:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Pedantic Tape Analyzer?
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:31:09 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>I don
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:04:42 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Lately, examining a dump of a tape output from SAS TAPECOPY,
>I noticed that the volser in the HDR1 records did not match
>the volser in the VOL1 record. OK. IBM doc says this field
>is defined but not verified by OPEN/CLOSE processing,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:31:09 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>
>Bruce Black probably would have known; we all miss him;
>I for some volunteer research he did when I asked another
>stupid question years ago.
>
In fact, some years ago Mr. Black recommended FATAR et. al. to
me. He even looked us up in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Pedantic Tape Analyzer?
Lately, examining a dump of a tape output from SAS TAPECOPY,
I noticed that
M Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2009 10:05 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Pedantic Tape Analyzer?
>
> Lately, examining a dump of a tape output from SAS TAPECOPY,
> I noticed that the vo
Lately, examining a dump of a tape output from SAS TAPECOPY,
I noticed that the volser in the HDR1 records did not match
the volser in the VOL1 record. OK. IBM doc says this field
is defined but not verified by OPEN/CLOSE processing, etc.
But I'm working on a utility of my own, for complex reaso
10 matches
Mail list logo
