IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL V8.0.3 - Clarification

2012-03-19 Thread jagadishan perumal
Hi, I have downloaded the below three files to install RDz but I dont find the FEKSETUP job to configure the Z/os end : 1) *IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL V8.0.3 (Core) Multilingual Multiplatform eAssembly (CRG26ML)* * * *2) IBM Rational Developer for System z V8.0.3 Quick Start

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL V8.0.3 - Clarification

2012-03-19 Thread Jousma, David
Of jagadishan perumal Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL V8.0.3 - Clarification Hi, I have downloaded the below three files to install RDz but I dont find the FEKSETUP job to configure the Z/os end : 1) *IBM Rational

IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-19 Thread Phil Smith
I asked Someone Who Would Know, and was told that it's an offering from a different division than the one that offers the traditional zPDT. It seems to have blindsided some folks (the usual IBM is many different companies syndrome!). To qualify you have to have a System z CPU and license the

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-18 Thread Mike W Stayton
Redbooks about z/PDT System z Personal Development Tool: Volume 1 Introduction and Reference, SG24-7721-01 http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247721.html?Open System z Personal Development Tool: Volume 2 Installation and Basic Use, SG24-7722-01

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-18 Thread Tony Harminc
to z/OS. Sure - I get the general idea, however ill-specified. But might it even be the case that only development based on actually using the desktop portion of IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL or IBM Rational Developer for System z with Java is permitted? GUI good - green-screen bad

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-15 Thread Tony Harminc
On 15 June 2010 01:14, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com wrote: Tony Harminc writes: The part that's not clear to me is that the Rational Developer for System z Unit Test environment clearly supports multiple users, but it sounds as though each user must have a separately licensed copy

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-15 Thread Timothy Sipples
want to use this single machine at the same time, which is clearly a supported thing to do. The IBM Rational Developer for System z Unit Test environment can be assigned to a single developer in a small system configuration, or can support small-scale team environment on a server platform. How many

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-14 Thread Timothy Sipples
Tony Harminc writes: The part that's not clear to me is that the Rational Developer for System z Unit Test environment clearly supports multiple users, but it sounds as though each user must have a separately licensed copy of the prereq Rational Developer for System z. Is this a technical

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-13 Thread Timothy Sipples
Here's the link to the Rational Developer for System z Unit Test announcement: http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/4/897/ENUS210-194/ENUS210-194.PDF The announcement lists all the relevant part numbers. They're available worldwide. (Well, excluding a small number of countries such as North

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-13 Thread Tony Harminc
On 13 June 2010 23:18, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com wrote: ...what does it mean when they say The Rational Developer for System z Unit Test environment requires a copy of either Rational Developer for System z with EGL or Rational Developer for System z with Java to install

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-12 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
john_w_gilm...@msn.com (john gilmore) writes: None of this is altruistic, but neither is it reprehensible. It is business as usual. IBM has always repudiated the notion that it is an eleemosynary organization. recent post in a.f.c. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010j.html#34 Idiotic

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-12 Thread john gilmore
About my contention that IBM's increasing intrusiveness is not malicious, that it is instead a byproduct of its attempts at mainframe market segmentation, Tony Harminc writes: | I agree. Nonetheless I find the increasing intrusiveness | annoying and fear the inevitable second order

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread Shane Ginnane
Rational Developer for System z with Java or IBM Rational Developer for System z with EGL. And I don't know how much that costs. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread Tony Harminc
of computing you can do on your system. Sure wouldn't want any of that robust development to happen on this box... I'd want to read the fine print very carefully - for example, how long do those z/OS licences last, and what does it mean when they say The Rational Developer for System z Unit Test environment

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread zMan
of computing you can do on your system. Sure wouldn't want any of that robust development to happen on this box... I'd want to read the fine print very carefully - for example, how long do those z/OS licences last, and what does it mean when they say The Rational Developer for System z Unit Test

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread john gilmore
Tony Harminc wrote: | And yet again IBM is trying to prescribe in ever more | detail what kind of computing you can do on your | system. I do not think that is quite right. I don't think the intrusiveness is intended. It is a byproduct. What it seems to me that IBM is trying to do is

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread Bill Fairchild
, June 11, 2010 12:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z ... It is business as usual. IBM has always repudiated the notion that it is an eleemosynary organization. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-11 Thread Tony Harminc
On 11 June 2010 13:27, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote: Tony Harminc wrote: | And yet again IBM is trying to prescribe in ever more | detail what kind of computing you can do on your system. I do not think that is quite right.  I don't think the intrusiveness is intended.  It is

IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-10 Thread McKown, John
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/rdz/unit_test.html zPDT development environment for MSRP of US $5,670.00 to run z/OS, compilers (COBOL, PL/I, HLASM, C/C++), DB2, IMS, and CICS/TS on an x86. But it says it is an add-on feature to IBM Rational Developer for System z with Java or IBM

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-10 Thread Timothy Sipples
Yes, the Rational Developer for System z Unit Test Feature should prove quite useful to many developers. Here's some more information: http://www.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/community/cobol/rdzut Another new option is the System z Solution Edition for Application Development: http

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-05 Thread Timothy Sipples
John Chase writes: That's how I _had_ RDz running, but after 60 days it refused to start unless I provided a product key for it. Our shop purchased only enough keys for our applications folks to use it. Just to clarify, when you order the CICS Service Flow Feature you should be receiving one

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-05 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples John Chase writes: That's how I _had_ RDz running, but after 60 days it refused to start unless I provided a product key for it. Our shop purchased only enough keys for our applications folks

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Timothy Sipples
Just to lay out some more options I previously posted here some information on a test drive that's now available for Rational Developer for System z. If you'd like to use it a couple times for 3 hours at a time, that might be an option. If you are a CICS Transaction Server V3.x customer, you

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread James Robinson
Of Graham Hobbs Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Rational Developer for System z Hello, Acronyms first: WDz = Websphere Developer for System z V7.0 RDz = Rational Developer for System z V7.1 According to an IBM website 'With this new release WDz has been renamed

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Graham Hobbs Hello, Acronyms first: WDz = Websphere Developer for System z V7.0 RDz = Rational Developer for System z V7.1 According to an IBM website 'With this new release WDz has been renamed to RDz

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Doc Farmer
Well, if anybody's interested in an irrational developer, call me! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Just to lay out some more options I previously posted here some information on a test drive that's now available for Rational Developer for System z. If you'd like to use it a couple times

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread HARDING, JERRY (CTR)
#? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Doc Farmer Sent: Wed 6/4/2008 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Rational Developer for System z Well, if anybody's interested in an irrational developer, call me

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of James Robinson Graham: We have installed and are currently testing r/DZ. There are a couple of things that you should know: 1) The mainframe COBOL piece of r/DZ *requires* SCLM to function. If

Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-04 Thread Bill Klein
, June 03, 2008 9:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Rational Developer for System z Hello, Acronyms first: WDz = Websphere Developer for System z V7.0 RDz = Rational Developer for System z V7.1 According to an IBM website 'With this new release WDz has been renamed to RDz

Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-03 Thread Graham Hobbs
Hello, Acronyms first: WDz = Websphere Developer for System z V7.0 RDz = Rational Developer for System z V7.1 According to an IBM website 'With this new release WDz has been renamed to RDz'. Have been out of the mainframe field (any field that is) for several years now, looking to 'acquire

Re: Rational Developer for System z

2008-06-03 Thread Brian Westerman
Hi, The fee is to give you access to all of the middleware (and PC) software that IBM makes. You get that access for 1 year, but any software you obtain is yours even after the 1 year expires, although you can't upgrade it. I think that you're probably going from an old version of the software