SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread R.S.
SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements. Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False? Q2: Actually there are separate DDDEF definitions for each zone and SMPWRKx are defined in GLOBAL zone as well as in TARGET zone. What

Re: SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S. SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements. Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False? True. Q2: Actually there are separate DDDEF definitions

Re: SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote: SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements. Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False? Overrides (sorry to correct your English) - True Q2: Actually

Re: SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:27:44 -0500, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote: SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements. Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF -

Re: SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread Norbert Friemel
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. wrote: SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements. Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False? From SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMDDALC): During any attempt to allocate a ddname, SMP/E will first look for

Re: SMPWRKx in SMP/E

2010-09-14 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:41:45 -0500, Norbert Friemel wrote: From SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMDDALC): During any attempt to allocate a ddname, SMP/E will first look for a DD statement specified in the job. If no DD statement was specified, SMP/E will look for a DDDEF entry in the zone. ... Which is only