SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly
coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements.
Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False?
Q2: Actually there are separate DDDEF definitions for each zone and
SMPWRKx are defined in GLOBAL zone as well as in TARGET zone.
What
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly
coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements.
Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False?
True.
Q2: Actually there are separate DDDEF definitions
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly
coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements.
Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False?
Overrides (sorry to correct your English) - True
Q2: Actually
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:27:44 -0500, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
wrote:
SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly
coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements.
Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF -
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:01:23 +0200, R.S. wrote:
SMPWRKx statement are defined as DDDEFs, but also can be explicitly
coded in job as /SMPWRKx DD statements.
Q1: JCL DD overwrites DDDEF - True/False?
From SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMDDALC):
During any attempt to allocate a ddname, SMP/E will first look for
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:41:45 -0500, Norbert Friemel wrote:
From SYS1.SAMPLIB(GIMDDALC):
During any attempt to allocate a ddname, SMP/E will first look for a
DD statement specified in the job. If no DD statement was specified,
SMP/E will look for a DDDEF entry in the zone. ...
Which is only
6 matches
Mail list logo