Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ink.net...
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when
I look in my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for
several minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:52:09 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something else you might look into: I think I remember that
messages for the operator console(s) appear in syslog and are
timestamped at the moment the messages is displayed on the console. So
if the
W. Kevin Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:52:09 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something else you might look into: I think I remember that
messages for the operator console(s) appear in syslog and are
Lizette,
You could start an automatic command to do a D T (Display Time)
every 30 seconds for a day or two. That would let you know whether
you have a problem without too much additional log output.
Brent Looper
UAMS
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when I look
in my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for several
minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand the gaps.
Does anyone have any thoughts as to why that might be?
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:03 -0500, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when I
look in my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for
several minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand the gaps.
No Spin Loops or other issues. RMF looks good. I will just monitor for now to
see if anything comes of it.
Thanks.
Lizette
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when I
look in my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for
several minutes. If this
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:47:18 -0500, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Spin Loops or other issues. RMF looks good. I will just monitor for
now to see if anything comes of it.
...
Synchonous SVCDUMPs? Seems like a long time for an SVCDUMP,
though.
Pat O'Keefe
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:56:08 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:47:18 -0500, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Spin Loops or other issues. RMF looks good. I will just monitor for
now to see if anything comes of it.
...
Synchonous SVCDUMPs? Seems
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:16:43 -0600, Brian Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion, the simple lack of messages in syslog / operlog is actually
evidence of a system which is well behaved. Absent any other symptom, you
should be pleased. I would be!
That's a good point. Of course just
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:03 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when I look
in
my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for several
minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand the gaps.
Does anyone
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:03 -0500, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a fairly active system. Stuff going on all the time. But when I look
in
my SYSLOG/OPERLOG I notice that I do not see a time stamp for several
minutes. If this system was not active, I could understand the
12 matches
Mail list logo
