Re: Submit a series of jobs in order aft er the pre v ious has completedâ â

2011-04-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: This is an old recurring problem. Ditto for DD statement restrictions. I recall early in my career with IBM we had a homegrown job scheduler which required that every DDNAME be unique because effectively it was a single step job that

Re: Submit a series of jobs in order aft er the pre v ious has completedâ â

2011-04-20 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
You are easily baffled. Application programs choose their own DDNAMEs, so the choice of DDNAME was a very early design decision for this crock to work. Program 1 gets dd01-dd99 ergo program 2 doesn't use those Getting warmer? On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin

Re: Submit a series of jobs in order aft er the pre v ious has completedâ â

2011-04-20 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
How can a single step have more than one STEPLIB? I also remember everywhere I looked in my time at IBM it said THINK...I'm thinking about it and the answer is still not 42. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne