On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
This is an old recurring problem. Ditto for DD statement restrictions.
I recall early in my career with IBM we had a homegrown job scheduler
which required that every DDNAME be unique because effectively it was
a single step job that
You are easily baffled.
Application programs choose their own DDNAMEs, so the choice of DDNAME
was a very early design decision for this crock to work.
Program 1 gets dd01-dd99
ergo program 2 doesn't use those
Getting warmer?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin
How can a single step have more than one STEPLIB?
I also remember everywhere I looked in my time at IBM it said
THINK...I'm thinking about it and the answer is still not 42.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne
3 matches
Mail list logo