Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-12 Thread Lopez, Sharon
Mystery solvedour problem was BMC Batch Optimizer...it was running on one test lpar but not the other, so our results were different. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Barry Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:41

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-11 Thread Dave Barry
See how much region was used by looking at the IEF374I message VIRT and EXT numbers for when it works and when it fails. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM To:

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-07 Thread Ulrich Krueger
Sharon, In that case, what exits do you have on your two systems which control / limit region size in batch jobs? Are they the same on both systems or might there be differences? IMHO, it appears to me that those exits might need customizing to ensure 100MB of above-the-line region for all batch

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-06 Thread Imbriale, Donald
Sharon, What error messages are you getting? Is it just the IBM1521I message? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-06 Thread Lopez, Sharon
Yes, that's the only error message. I can get it to work with 0m and 60m. IBM PL/I level 2 is telling me that the new compiler needs about 100m to run. It will run with 6m on my 1.9 base system that was generated in Jan. 08. It doesn't run with 6m after I applied 700+ ptfs to my 1.9 system.

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-06 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Yes, that's the only error message. I can get it to work with 0m and 60m. For storage below the 16M line, both 0M and 60M allocate all that's available. (Actually, any figure above 16M allocates all below, unless you have an exit controlling it). So, how big is your below the line private.

z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-05 Thread Lopez, Sharon
We have 1.9 on one of our test systems. This is a system that was build in Jan. 2008. We also have another test 1.9 system, which I just applied all hipers and RSUs through 0806 and now I cannot get PL/I 3.7 to compile. Both systems have the same storage amount. Has anyone seen anything

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-05 Thread Bob Shannon
What is your region size? Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-05 Thread Pedro Vera
now I cannot get PL/I 3.7 to compile. Need more problem details. Pedro Vera -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-05 Thread Lopez, Sharon
Region = 6m...works on the 1.8 system. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is

Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue

2008-09-05 Thread Tim McCluskey
Try REGION=0M On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lopez, Sharon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Region = 6m...works on the 1.8 system. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:12 PM To: