Hi,
IS it possible to extend a volumes VTOC when the volume is online?
I tried the command:
REFORMAT -
UNITADDRESS(803) -
VERIFY(MKB901) -
EXTVTOC(360)
and got:
ICK31049I UNITADDRESS SPECIFIED FOR ONLINE VOLUME
We are using z/OS 1.11
Thanks
Gadi
Thanks.
It worked after the change
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extending VTOC
Let me just add some words on this and allow me to link it to today's
IBM systems.
In a certain sense, this machine and its programming system was far ahead
of its time, also compared to today's systems like z/OS and LE. Let me
explain this:
every compile was started through the same command
On 11/24/2012 07:31 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 20121123173422.1478033...@panix2.panix.com, on 11/23/2012
at 12:34 PM, Randy Hudson i...@panix.com said:
There was a 2002 Supreme Court case on that, Eldred v Ashcroft;
the Court held that as long as Congress specified a specific
Hi list
We have the strangest problem regarding DVIPA and communication between the
plex lpars.
In Production we have 2 z/OS 1.11 plex members using sysplex dist and DVIPA.
In Dev and sandbox we have 2 z/OS 1.13 plex members using sysplex dist and
DVIPA.
Last week Production lpars stopped
I've learned something new. Thanks.
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 22:50 +0100, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2012-11-24 21:48, John McKown pisze:
I don't know how prevalent the specific license mentioned is. I wasn't
even aware of the FWLC (Flat Workload License Charge). I am under the
impression that most
tks for reply...sent ya another---questions ... workload/seervice
reporting...who too's..and altering duration of reporting ..red book sort
of helpful but missing setup or something to change either..
From: Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/21/2012
mean how too's ... nimble fingers...
From: Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/25/2012 12:27 PM
Subject:Re: RMF Spreadsheet Reporter
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
tks for reply...sent ya
Dave
Ideally questions regarding Communications Server, both the IP and SNA
components, should be posed in the IBMTCP-L list:
For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L
However, since I'm here, I'll have
On 23/11/2012 7:52 PM, Cobe Xu wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I may propose to my management for a EasySMF for my PC. Is that I should go
for single user/PC key?
Any limitation on managed/processed LPARs SMF? As I have several z-boxes,
which running over 50 Lpars. In this case, still $595/year?
If you
10 matches
Mail list logo
