W dniu 2013-03-07 11:36, Miklos Szigetvari pisze:
Hi
We need to copy a large number of DASD volumes (from zDASD to DS6800).
Any option to speed up?
Seems CONCURRENT is not supported by the zDASD.
For obvious reasons you cannot use FlashCopy or similar PiT techniques,
the same for PPRC,SRDF,
Hi Miklos,
I'm making the assumption that your are referring to dfdss.
The traditional way of speeding up dfdss (adrdssu) copy's (or dumps) is by
using the OPT keyword.
I believe the default is (3) which is 5 tracks read at at time.
OPT(1) 1 track OPT(2) 2 tracks OPT(3) 5 tracks and OPT(4) 15
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
We need to copy a large number of DASD volumes (from zDASD to DS6800).
Any option to speed up?
Format/Init and then copy? :-D
Sorry, but I can't resist above... Yes I saw Radoslaw's excellent comment.
Seems CONCURRENT is not supported by the zDASD.
Questions:
Do you
Hi
Thank you
We will migrate from the zDASD to DS6800 .
We need to make a physical copy while the systems are down.
We will use a backup system and we would like to speed up something like
this:
COPY FULL INDYNAM(HFS039) OUTDYNAM(RESML1) COPYVOLID -
ALLDATA(*) ALLEXCP ADMIN
Funny but
Hi
The dfdss accepting haply the OPT(4) keyword, the copy time dropped from
10 minutes to abut 7 minutes.
The real copy will go from ESCON channels to FICON .
We have to do this only once, as BusTech gave up the support for zDASD .
Thank you
On 07.03.2013 12:37, David Devine wrote:
Hi
The PARALLEL keyword will cause DSS to start each copy as a sub task and run
them together. Use SERIAL to single thread the copy if you wish.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:34:15 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
Hi
The dfdss accepting haply the OPT(4) keyword, the
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013c.html#11 Article for the boss: COBOL will
outlive us all
more cobol related trivia ... other spin-offs from the science center
were companies that started offerring cp67 as commercial online service
... recent post in a.f.c
In
4ee2851a2279b94cb70cd69b174106096ccda...@s1flokydce2kx01.dm0001.info53.com,
on 03/06/2013
at 02:25 PM, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com said:
The CF command as issued as a z/OS command only configures it off to
that LPAR.
True, but you can broadcast a command to the entire sysplex. Or is
In
985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c21f37ff...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 03/05/2013
at 02:18 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
said:
Sometimes I wish they had not done away with TNL's (yeah, I know it's
impractical in an age of electronic books,
It is not, however,
In 1631048133608148.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/05/2013
at 05:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
If you don't find it in the Index, look very
carefully through the entire catalogue.
Keep in mind the traditional application of said catalog.
--
In 9933210527218233.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/06/2013
at 08:20 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Why is this discussion taking place here ratner than on
ASSEMBLER-LIST?
Why not? It is on topic.
F Assembler? Assembler VS?
ITYM XF.
Assembler VS was known as
In 1362595274.25094.yahoomai...@web181403.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
03/06/2013
at 10:41 AM, Lloyd Fuller leful...@sbcglobal.net said:
In fact many of the feature upgrades from H Assembler to HLASM came
from the SLAC mods descriptions as we wrote SHARE requirements for
those features.
In at
how to trim the 0d during transfer from aix to host side, any connect
direct exit can trim the 0d?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
W dniu 2013-03-07 14:41, Matthew Stitt pisze:
The PARALLEL keyword will cause DSS to start each copy as a sub task
and run them together. Use SERIAL to single thread the copy if you
wish.
The same can be done by submitting several jobs in parallel, but
actually we talk about quite poor
Can anyone here answer question...
Can the new ConnDir on M/F talk to a FTP/SSL on another M/F or does it
need to be ConnDir to ConnDir??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 22:40:23 +0800, Tommy Tsui wrote:
how to trim the 0d during transfer from aix to host side, any connect
direct exit can trim the 0d?
FTP does that routinely. Is FTP an alternative?
I'm somewhat surprised that AIX uses 0D0A -- isn't AIX a UNIX-like
system that I'd expect to
Hello list,
Has anyone ever tried to use the JZOS batch launcher to launch a chain that
needs to be APF authorized ? It was linked (at least the version I am using
from JDK 6.0.1) with AC(0) and I wonder if there is an APF authorized
equivalent for it such as BPXBATA2 compared to BPXBATSL ?
From: Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
Date: 03/07/2013 09:02 AM
Can anyone here answer question...
Can the new ConnDir on M/F talk to a FTP/SSL on another M/F or does it
need to be ConnDir to ConnDir??
SNIP
ConnDir as in CONNECT:Direct? A/K/A: C:D, NDM, etc.?
If that is correct, then no.
Did I hear the other day that there is a Connect:Direct clone out there
somewhere?
(No disagreement with the answer below. C:D uses a proprietary protocol that
has its roots in SNA.)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
Date: 03/07/2013 10:14 AM
Did I hear the other day that there is a Connect:Direct clone out there
somewhere?
(No disagreement with the answer below. C:D uses a proprietary protocol
that
has its roots in SNA.)
Charles
SNIPPAGE
Yes, kinda, maybe.
On 3/7/2013 10:23 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 7215099641551385.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/06/2013
at 08:16 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Afterthought: If the module expects OS CALL linkage conventions,
use LINKMVS rather than LINKPGM.
No!
There were several of us working on the SHARE requirements. We tried to make a
business case for the requirements that we needed. And, yes, some of Greg's
changes did not get put into HLASM.
A few we could not come up with a business case, and a few none of us were
using
and we did not
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:01:00 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 3/7/2013 10:23 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
No! Only use LINKMVS if you want halfword length fields prepended to
the arguments; otherwise use LINKPGM.
For the OP the target is CoBOL, presumably expecting character values.
Does anyone know of a way to anaylyze performance and perform data modeling
similar to what zTPM does?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
Hello:
There are a couple of products from RES that provides this capability. Daisy
and Daisy/DM. You can learn more about them on www.res-it.com.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Moderization Consultant
www.lcmg.us
-Original Message-
From: gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN
Regarding how you'd know, I have no idea. This wasn't done in an APAR.
Regarding LR 15,R5
surely you provided the equate of R5 (or some macro did); fix/enhance the
equate/macro.
I see yregs, for example, which apparently is owned by DFSMS, has no
facility for adding the register-size
My manager requested me to gather some information about a product called
zDynaCap from ESAi (Enterprise Systems Associates Inc.).
The rep supplied a link for a doc concerning the product. The article was
short and not very in depth and claimed it could cut our IBM software costs.
Has anyone
On 7 March 2013 07:53, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
[With respect to GR32=NO|YES on IHASDWA]
Regarding how you'd know, I have no idea. This wasn't done in an APAR.
So how did *you* find out? Word of mouth, stumbled across it in the
macro, or an internal doc of some sort? Or are you
See this:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=256965tstart=0
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:39 AM, ESHEL Jonathan j.es...@rsd.com wrote:
Hello list,
Has anyone ever tried to use the JZOS batch launcher to launch a
W dniu 2013-03-07 18:35, Mitch pisze:
Hello:
There are a couple of products from RES that provides this capability. Daisy
and Daisy/DM. You can learn more about them on www.res-it.com.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Moderization Consultant
MODERIZATION?
From the homepage:
LCMG
On 3/7/2013 10:51 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
The bottom line is that I can't see a way to both use the
TYPECHECK(REGISTER) option, and use SETRP in AR mode with RUB=(...).
(Well, I can, of course - I changed RUB=(R5) to RUB=(5), thus avoiding
the warning, but also avoiding the checking.
FWIW,
In 2497740495126867.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/07/2013
at 09:29 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I'm somewhat surprised that AIX uses 0D0A -- isn't AIX a UNIX-like
system that I'd expect to use simply 0A?
AIX is Unix, but the OP didn't specify what protocol or
In 5138c7cc.4010...@valley.net, on 03/07/2013
at 12:01 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
For the OP the target is CoBOL, presumably expecting character
values.
AFAIK COBOL doesn't expect a halfword prefix on character parameters.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:46:57 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 03/07/2013 at 09:29 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I'm somewhat surprised that AIX uses 0D0A -- isn't AIX a UNIX-like
system that I'd expect to use simply 0A?
AIX is Unix, but the OP didn't specify what
the file send from window server to aix with binary mode, 0d0a is reserved,
finally the file send from aix to mainframe with ascii mode c:d, 0d is keep
On 2013-3-8 上午6:56, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+...@patriot.net
wrote:
In 2497740495126867.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:48:58 +0800, Tommy Tsui wrote:
the file send from window server to aix with binary mode, 0d0a is reserved,
finally the file send from aix to mainframe with ascii mode c:d, 0d is keep
On 2013-3-8 �W��6:56, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+...@patriot.net
wrote:
Send it from
IEFSD095! In my early days (1968) working in POK, OS/360 System Design
Department, I came across that very module -- and couldn't believe its
blecherous code. It wasn't my assignment, but in not much time I rewrote it and
ran speed tests, proving that my version was some multiple faster than
On Mar 7, 2013, at 10:56 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
SNIP_
In your honor, the blecherous code in IEFSD095 has been left
unchanged, even as of z/OS 2.1
I remember that I used iefsd095 back in 1972 to create a short timers
calendar, to mark off the number
38 matches
Mail list logo
