Peter Farley writes:
And unfortunately [Enterprise COBOL V5.1] does NOT allow the same range
of values that the C/C++ compiler's ARCH option allows.
Enterprise COBOL V5.1 supports compilation for ARCH(6) and above, i.e.
z990/z890 processors and above. Enterprise COBOL V4.2 is still available if
W dniu 2013-07-20 09:12, Ron Hawkins pisze:
Radoslaw,
I agree with your question up to a point. Encryption of data at rest covers
most of the disk related scenarios to do with data protection. It especially
makes my favorite soapbox of erasing disks with multiple overwrites a
redundant task.
This post is a response to a question that was, I am all but certain,
addressed not to me but to another John, John Eells.
z/OS is a large, powerful, and complex operating system. It is
heterogeneous too. Some of it has been rearchitected (a barbarous but
now inescapable word) to reflect
Lizette,
Here is what I had said earlier (see below). I cannot figure out why the
output dsn SYS2.DATASET.REPORT does not show is that dsn list but only system
stats. David Devine said that The problem is that you want to get a report on
M type (migration) dcollect records and the job
For and unfortunately only for those of you who read Italian there is
a beguiling fumetto of this title by Tuono Pettinato and Francesca
Riccioni accessible via the Corriere della Sera Cultura website
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
There is a small performance hit on current DASD with keeping the
obsolete IMBED REPLICATE structures , as John Eells has already implied
by use of significant in his statement that there is no SIGNIFICANT
performance or space advantage. The consensus in shops requiring 24x7
availability is the
According to the Naviquest manual:
ACBQBAR7 is called by SYS1.SACBCNTL member ACBJBARD to generate a flat file
from DCOLLECT data taken from data set records and lists the fields of your
choice, in the order you specify.
Does not appear to handle Migrated data.
So, you could run a plain
Also here
Additional Storage Administration Functions
z/OS V1R11.0 DFSMSdfp Storage Administration z/OS V1R10.0-V1R11.0 SC26-7402-13
The following are additional storage administration functions:
QSAVE and QRETRIEV ISMF commands
The QSAVE and QRETRIEV ISMF commands let you save a
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:33:52 -0700, John Mattson wrote:
After looking into this more deeply I realize I have to start all
over. I do not have enough disk on OMVS to copy to OMVS and then gzip,
and I have no spare disk to add. So that is out. Even the stdout still
requires disk be
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:33:52 -0700, John Mattson wrote:
SO to start all over IS there a way to
1) On zOS MVS convert a file to ascii and/then
2) Zip, compress whatever, it into something which gzip can unzip in unix?
Most easy; tested on an Ubuntu Linux system under Virtualbox on OS X:
Lizette,
Thanks for your help. I have the NAVIQUEST manual and I will take a look.
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:38:12 AM
Subject: Re: DCOLLECT QUESTION -RESULTS PUZZLING -
Lisa,
Just to let you know that I was able to get the dsn list with the job (examples
in the z/OS V1R12.0 DFSMSdfp Storage Administration SC26-7402-14
pages 382 383) however for some reason it does not list any of the MIGRATED
dsns. I tried another test just to select MIGRATEDATA
I ran this process and received data in the DATASET.REPORT file. But it was
only for ONLINE dasd. This is expected.
Your messages indicate the process ran. Most likely no data to format.
Please run a FULL DCOLLECT for all record types then try this process again.
Remember my comment:
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE.
I have the following code fragment in an inline function, compiled by the
IBM XLC compiler as C++:
unsigned long long valueToTest;
unsigned int testWord;
testWord = valueToTest 32;
It *appears* to me (from somewhat circumstantial evidence in a much more
As a general ROT I always use explicit casts.
On 21/07/2013, at 4:24 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE.
I have the following code fragment in an inline function, compiled by the
IBM XLC compiler as C++:
unsigned long long valueToTest;
unsigned
Thanks. How would I solve this with a cast? I can force it to be wrong LOL
but can I force it to be right?
It seems to me like testWord = static_castunsigned long long(valueToTest
32) might not solve the problem because that cast seems to me to imply
that the expression inside the parentheses is
Hmmm. Not following your logic but I may give it a try.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: MVS OpenEdition [mailto:mvs...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David
Crayford
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 4:51 PM
To: mvs...@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [MVS-OE] Looking for help with an obscure C
Okay. What do you think of the union approach?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [MVS-OE] Looking for help with an
I don't like it because it's a hack to work around an puzzling issue. I
want to know why the optimizer is not generating the correct code. It's
disconcerting and I've experienced it myself,
but only in situations where the code was convoluted (double pointers
and casts). I ended up rewriting
In 4983992839630034.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
07/19/2013
at 09:15 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Mathematical/scientific notation tends to use single-character
identifiers, to be case-sensitive, and to admit characters from
Greek, Hebrew, ...
Also. face and
In
985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c2319c1e...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 07/19/2013
at 11:19 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
said:
If Ron's question is your second one, there is dos2unix:
Wouldn't that change CRLF to LF rather than deleting it entirely?
--
In
ofbcd77944.7c19f534-on86257bad.005225a8-86257bad.00524...@agfinance.com,
on 07/19/2013
at 09:58 AM, Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com said:
is there some thing on Windows that would strip the CRLF off??
Why would you want to? If your data are not text then you should be
transmitting them as
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 22:33:38 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 07/19/2013 at 09:58 AM, Ron Wells said:
is there some thing on Windows that would strip the CRLF off??
Why would you want to? If your data are not text then you should be
transmitting them as binary.
The OP never really
Big Blue cedes software and systems training biz to partners
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2013/07/16/
ibm_software_systems_training_channel/
*IF* this is true... is Z/os may not be far behind.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN
If you go to CBTTAPE.ORG and go for FILE206, it seems to have a REXX parser
for DCOLLECT records
/*TOTAL FROM D, M AND B RECORDS: */
/* L0+ML1+ML2 DSN COUNT */
/* TOTAL L0 + ML1 +ML2 ALLOCATED
25 matches
Mail list logo
