We don't have Flash, so I have no experience there, but you have history
available. Maybe online in Mainview for some period, if Mainview has been
configured so. Otherwise in the RMF records (produced by CMF).
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thank you very much.
Of course, it is all about the quality of the implementation.
The implementation on a certain environment may be bad
or not very motivated ... but the language REXX should not
be blamed for this.
Some time ago (maybe 10 years) I tested REXX on OS/2 vs. Regina on Linux
on
Anyone else having trouble getting into Shopz?
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Yes, I just get a display that says 'null' which is not helpful when I'm trying
to acquire some IMS PTFs :(
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:18 AM
To:
I get the same 'null'. I am trying to get a Security Integrity APAR (SIA) PTF
for MQ. :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Beesley, Paul
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 6:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
FWIW, JavaScript runs on the mainframe in a JVM as well, which has the
advantage of being zAAP/zIIP eligible. I've done a fair bit of that. Some of it
to pretty good productive use.
Lua does look interesting and has the benefit of having an actual I/O library
included.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014
Yep, the website does not appear to be functioning. However, if you are setup
for receive order you can still get all your maintenance. The only time I
ever logon to ShopZ anymore is to order product upgrade PDO's.
_
Dave Jousma
So much for that upgrade that had it down all last weekend.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 7:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ShopzSeries down?
Yep,
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
So much for that upgrade that had it down all last weekend.
Ouch. Are there not an alternative site or methods available?
Groete / Greeting
Elardus Engelbrecht
PS: Connectivity and availability problems are the reasons why I try to use
IBM's LMS site on the 5th
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford
On 24/10/2014 6:50 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Doesn't the example in the benchmark show performance problems in
EXECIO instead of REXX? EXECIO, IMO, is not part of the REXX
interpreter, but instead
Peter,
Thank you for your insight on this. I was just hoping on a single system
BPXOINIT could somehow tell me more. Lots of changes for stuff like filling
/tmp when we move from V1R13 to V2R1.
Thanks again, Dave
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
I get the same 'null'. I am trying to get a Security Integrity APAR (SIA) PTF
for MQ. :-(
Have you not configured a RECEIVE ORDER job for obtaining PTFs?
Greatest thing since sliced bread. :-)
Oh for a mainframe with an internet connection ... sadly, not... customers say
no.
A RECEIVE ORDER capability here would be welcomed...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, October 24,
I am trying to run a benchmark test as David suggested using the clists in
http://users.tpg.com.au/crayford/rexx-lua-c-io-benchmark.htm
the only big files I have to read (containing alot of data) are SMF archives.
LUA4Z reads them without a problem but
REXX/EXECIO gives this error:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Beesley, Paul
Oh for a mainframe with an internet connection ... sadly, not... customers
say no.
A RECEIVE ORDER capability here would be welcomed...
Our sandbox system is allowed client only external access, and
Peter,
I can get very confused reading the books. This is from the V1R13 MVS
System Commands book for D OMVS,U:
U=userid
Displays process information for all processes associated with the specified
TSO/E user ID. Use this operand when a user requests that a hung process be
canceled. You can
Like landing at Thanet, having Lua usable under z/OS UNIX is a good
thing. It may make its way against REXX, or again it may not.
The matrix-algebra test case is not, however, an appropriate one for
the comparative evaluation of these two implementations of Lua and
REXX. It is not indeed a good
Thanks for the update, John! :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ShopzSeries down?
The Shopz team knows it's down, and they
So HEX PID 50331938 is DEC 1345526072
My bad. I didn't lookup the description of fuser. due to the c in the process
id of the first process, I was concluding it was a hex value. It is not, it is
decimal! The c is a usage indicator. So drop any trailing c or r from the
process id and take
LUA could use some good tutorials or at least some more samples of code.
The reference manual is no help for someone trying to learn the language.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Friday, October 24,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov
wrote:
snip
the only big files I have to read (containing alot of data) are SMF
archives.
LUA4Z reads them without a problem but
snip
So LUA4Z is probably better for this reason alone – it can read any file.
PMFJI here, but I just wanted to add one small issue I have with the lua
language - The fact that it does not use POSIX extended regular expression
syntax for string patterns. As a long-time [g]awk user, I am very experienced
and comfortable with POSIX RE syntax, but I am totally unfamiliar
On 24/10/2014 11:03 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
LUA could use some good tutorials or at least some more samples of code.
The reference manual is no help for someone trying to learn the language.
The canonical programming guide is PIL (Programming In Lua)
http://www.lua.org/pil/contents.html.
I'm trying to set a SLIP trap to get a dump for IBM to figure out why some SAF
calls are taking a long time. The module I want to trap is part of a load
module called VSHDITSK in a started task named ZPHIL510. The instruction after
the SAF call is at offset 794 in that module; the LKED output
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua4z: the Lua programming language on z/OS, with batteries
snip
OK, let's try
Does the module live in private storage, LPA, CSA,.?
snip
I'm trying to set a SLIP trap to get a dump for IBM to figure out why some SAF
calls are taking a long time. The module I want to trap is part of a load
module called VSHDITSK in a started task named ZPHIL510. The instruction after
And, it's back up (since at least 2:00 US Eastern time; i.e., a bit over
an hour ago).
ee...@us.ibm.com (John Eells) wrote:
The Shopz team knows it's down, and they are working to get it up and
running ASAP.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
I keep getting this error both in MVS and UNIX.
LUA: //'xcics.lua4z.samplib(cpu)':4: attempt to perform arithmetic on field '?
' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
Just because you are not paging due to lots of real/flash isn't a reason to not
have sufficient page datasets in case you need them for dumping of some runaway
memory gobbler.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of
I would guess that, as previously suggested,
for i = 1, count do a[i] = a[i] * i end
would really rather be
for i = 1, count do a[i] = i * i end
Bob
Barkow, Eileen wrote:
I keep getting this error both in MVS and UNIX.
LUA: //'xcics.lua4z.samplib(cpu)':4: attempt to perform arithmetic on
This suggestion is probably unrelated to the actual issue, but I see the
odd characters ÝC¨ in your note, which I think should display as square
brackets. If your terminal emulator is currently set to use code page
37 (or similar), you might try code page 1047.
Barkow, Eileen wrote:
I keep
Thank you -
for i = 1, count do a[i] = i * i end fixed the problem.
I get an elapsed time of about 0.14 - 0.15 running LUA on both UNIX and MVSs,
But the REXX clist yields about 3.3
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
I had to change the brackets to x'AD' X'BD', the same as I use for java.
The for i = 1, count do a[i] = i * i end statement fixed the problem.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014
You are missing MODE=HOME
Regards,
George Kozakos
z/OS Software Service, Level 2 Supervisor
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
24/10/2014 02:20:12 PM:
From: Phil Smith p...@voltage.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 24/10/2014 02:21 PM
Subject: SLIP trap
As long as he doesn't exceed 30% usage, he should be fine. Maybe
automatically issue the command hourly to find the peak?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
Just because you are not paging due to lots of real/flash isn't a reason to
not have sufficient page
On 25/10/2014 12:01 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
PMFJI here, but I just wanted to add one small issue I have with the lua language -
The fact that it does not use POSIX extended regular expression syntax for string
patterns. As a long-time [g]awk user, I am very experienced and
Lua4z was built using the IBM-1047 code page but the lexer and parser
have been patched to tolerate IBM-037
http://lua4z.com/doc/manual/using.md.html#Square_brackets.
Unfortunately, output is printed in IBM-1047 which is why the square
brackets are garbled. I could fix this but you need to
On 25/10/2014 3:35 AM, Bob Rutledge wrote:
I would guess that, as previously suggested,
for i = 1, count do a[i] = a[i] * i end
would really rather be
for i = 1, count do a[i] = i * i end
Good eye Bob! When I copy and pasted the snippet into the e-mail it
dropped the square brackets.
Might I suggest changing the variable name from A to SQ?
Then you have the calculation of SQ[i] = i * i.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:32 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2014 3:35 AM, Bob Rutledge wrote:
I would guess that, as previously suggested,
for i = 1, count do a[i]
39 matches
Mail list logo
