Re: Multiline WTO using REXXTOOLS in batch does not show up on console

2014-11-09 Thread Itschak Mugzach
It look like this is a vendor product, not a standard rexx. Have u tried sendind message to the console? (Send 'msg text') console(xxx) ITschak בתאריך 8 בנוב 2014 01:18, ‏JoAnn Kulcyk jkulc...@glhec.org כתב: I have a REXX exec that issues a WTO with routing and descriptor codes both equal to

Doug Nadel snippet

2014-11-09 Thread Robert Prins
In a grey-ish past, Doug Nadel once published a tiny (no more than a few lines of REXX) edit macro that made it possible to change, in the ISPF editor, the characters that are used as word-separators, which, if I remember correctly, removed the '-' so that it became possible to search for

Re: Doug Nadel snippet

2014-11-09 Thread Robert Prins
I got a reply, telling me to have a look at http://web.archive.org/web/20140103041347/http://www.sillysot.com/ftp/ and the routine is indeed mentioned there (ADDCHAR.TXT), but sadly that routine has not been archived. :( Robert -- Robert AH Prins robert(a)prino(d)org

Re: UNABLE TO COPY PDS.

2014-11-09 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In v3ft5a97iuncjdk4hcurs1uje46lpq6...@4ax.com, on 11/08/2014 at 09:04 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said: I think the poster meant that each block is a unique record and that for RECFM=U, RECSIZE is irrelevant and in many DSCBs, can be 0. That's quite different from what he

Fwd: Re: Doug Nadel snippet

2014-11-09 Thread Robert Prins
All, On Nov 9, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Robert Prins robert.ah.pr...@gmail.com wrote: I got a reply, telling me to have a look at http://web.archive.org/web/20140103041347/http://www.sillysot.com/ftp/ and the routine is indeed mentioned there (ADDCHAR.TXT), but sadly that routine has not been

Re: Fwd: Re: Doug Nadel snippet

2014-11-09 Thread David Crayford
Could you achieve a similar result by using the new find r'regex' regular expression syntax in z/OS 2.1? On 10/11/2014 9:37 AM, Robert Prins wrote: All, On Nov 9, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Robert Prins robert.ah.pr...@gmail.com wrote: I got a reply, telling me to have a look at