On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 19:18:44 -0500 Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com
wrote:
:At 22:59 + on 12/23/2014, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote about
:Re: BDW length vs. Physical Length:
:I can't remember, but BSAM may, and I stress may, check the block
:length is a multiple of the LRECL.
:This
In
caarmm9spihcfyncf90+zehetejvq1ciyvwucc6k_ijvk6oj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/18/2014
at 10:00 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
PL/I supported QTAM and later TCAM message queues as what a C or
Java person might call first class objects. Looked at another
way, such a teleprocessing
In 8d1e58fb6d10ea2-1864-43...@webmail-vd012.sysops.aol.com, on
12/14/2014
at 03:33 AM, Mitch 005d889cebf0-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
said:
I am trying to follow what you are asking, but am unsure Are you
saying there is something in a JCL environment that should be
reported as an
In 20141221173446.fd8ed08264703ad3452c5...@gmx.net, on 12/21/2014
at 05:34 PM, ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net said:
Nice summary, Peter. Do you happen to know who puts in //STARTING JOB
... when MEMBER is only contained in the JES2 proclib concatenation
and not in MSTJCL?
Presumably IEEVSTAR for
In
of6354b600.7395d730-on85257dae.0050c584-85257dae.00512...@us.ibm.com,
on 12/14/2014
at 09:46 AM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com said:
What comes to mind (but I might be mis-thinking a bit) is that the
intent is that the OPER TSO command really should not be used;
that has been true for
In 06d401d01a5e$a7a0b6c0$f6e22440$@mcn.org, on 12/17/2014
at 05:05 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
I just added a JCLLIB statement to a cataloged procedure that I
start with a Start command. I am getting IEFC019I MISPLACED JCLLIB
STATEMENT. Should I infer that JCLLIB is not allowed
In
CAAJSdjjtjcYJvNeBgz7ZVZgt1p=4cSK42bM8o9B71WNyQ5=7...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/18/2014
at 08:35 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
I agree. But I will also mention that just using the word file
can now be confusing due to the addition of UNIX into z/OS.
Well, due to IBM's
In 0de6a9840123e547b061ac5b6765c0261753e...@exmb-05.ad.wsu.edu, on
12/18/2014
at 03:48 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu said:
While I agree that IEFJOBS makes it clearer and works better, you
can place started job JCL in the MSTJCL PROCLIB.
Yes, you can place a job in IEFPDSI, but the Devil
Merry Christmas to you and yours from me and my girlshere in New Jersey
Best Regards,
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
In 20141216105556.66da404ee6d280833b79b...@gmx.net, on 12/16/2014
at 10:55 AM, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net said:
These two make up the 6 byte
BDW+RDW is 8 bytes.
without exceeding geometry.
I've seen geometry used to refer to the number of tracks per
cylinder, but never for the length
In 002901d01953$e00d4390$a027cab0$@q.com, on 12/16/2014
at 09:15 AM, retired mainframer retired-mainfra...@q.com said:
Isn't the RDW already included in the LRECL (VBA print files are 137
which leaves 133 for data which includes carriage control)? Isn't
the BDW always excluded from the LRECL
In 00b301d018c4$5b2655c0$11730140$@mcn.org, on 12/15/2014
at 04:08 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
I'm looking for a reasonable way to replace all occurrences of a
given string in a dataset.
Can you live with equal length replacements?
it has to be easier than writing a Rexx
In 549ab499026d0017d...@prv-mh.provo.novell.com, on 12/24/2014
at 10:42 AM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com said:
A quick Google search turned up this:
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/3-pdf-document-management-tools-organizing-research/
How many of those tools will extract the document title and
In 5727780323951226.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
12/15/2014
at 07:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
Are you using TRANSMIT or AMATERSE on MVS/380? I had
thought they were relatively new, probably licensed program
products, and not
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 09:24:38 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 12/14/2014 at 09:09 AM, Alan Watthey said:
The change command is still missing one capability I would love to
see. The ability to set variables in the first parameter.
If you're going to ask for captures, why not go whole
I have to question the accuracy of Mr. Altmark's comment. First let's take
the last question from Paul Gilmartin.
ECKD, which is what all modern DASD is, stands for Extended Count Key Data.
The 'Extended' refers to the channel commands you can issue, not the devices
capabilities. All
cblaic...@syncsort.com (Blaicher, Christopher Y.) writes:
ECKD, which is what all modern DASD is, stands for Extended Count Key
Data. The 'Extended' refers to the channel commands you can issue,
not the devices capabilities. All blocks written to a ECKD device
consist of a Count field, an
Lynn,
Of course you are correct as far as the physical disk is concerned, but z/OS
only talks to ECKD controllers which emulate ECKD on FBA devices.
The discussion was on how BSAM and other I/O routines read and write data on
DASD.
Chris Blaicher
Principal Software Engineer, Software
18 matches
Mail list logo
