If the PACK is on, you can only read it with ISPF. It can't be read
by any other process.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:50 AM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens internally when this feature is ON ? Instructions wise any
change happens internally ?
On 29 Dec 2014 12:10,
W dniu 2014-12-29 o 07:50, mf db pisze:
What happens internally when this feature is ON ? Instructions wise any
change happens internally ?
PACK ON means some kind of text compression. It is transparent to the
ISPF editor (you always see unpacked content), but it cannot be
recognized by
W dniu 2014-12-28 o 14:55, Phil Smith pisze:
Alan Altmark wrote:
Microcode is burned into the CPUs, being the on-chip logic that actually runs
the native instruction set.
Alan, by that definition, none of us have ever applied a microcode patch. Yet I
remember distinctly doing so (box after
Check out the SETROPTS HISTORY and MINCHANGE options if you haven't already.
Thanks, Tom! I did that and set history accordingly. No need for an exit, then!
I would set MINCHANGE only if I see that someone tries to change the many
passwords that are now kept to get to the (n+1)th password.
Why force your users to change passwords at all? I know everyone does it
but what problems does it solve?
1. Bob needs access to some dataset that his userid does not grant. So Alice
loans him her logon credentials. Forcing Alice to change her password
prevents Bob from continuing to masquerade
In 7536935054212770.wa.alanaltmarkus.ibm@listserv.ua.edu, on
12/29/2014
at 12:09 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com said:
When we first started using the word microcode I believe it was
correct. Then we split the microcode into a burned-in part and a
loadable part, so the word came
Thank you and a Merry Christmas to you and yours.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas to you and
You can do internet searches on ISPF PACK FORMAT and find many entries on it.
You can go to www.ibm.com and search on ISPF PACK and get a lot of information
You can go to ISPF and in the EDIT panel press PF1 (HELP) and find information
on it.
As others have said, only ISPF can read ISPF PACK
Hello,
Is it possible to activate a new applid in VTAM without IPLing.
Regards,
Judy Ellis
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
What type of applid?
Mostly Yes. Check out the V NET command for syntax.
And if you have not done so, you may wish to join the TCPIP list which can also
be helpful.
TCPIP To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the
command (paste it!) in the e-mail message body:
Seasonal greetings from Israel.
ITschak
Thank you and a Merry Christmas to you and yours.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 07:41:10 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
My point about splitting is I just run a typical split with top
and bottom. I do not used named splits, rings, etc. Just a
single simple split.
Really? I don't think I could work like that. In fact, I have my own
ISPCFIGU module to allow
Thanks, Alan-as with so many such things, the real answer is thus It depends!
(where have I heard THAT before?). And it's a multivariable dependency: when,
where, why, how...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In 6469079386912310.wa.alanaltmarkus.ibm@listserv.ua.edu, on
12/29/2014
at 10:44 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com said:
Yes, lots of articles, and at the end of the day, you still have no
idea how the machine you have is implemented.
Well, we used to, back when customers could
Am 29.12.2014 um 17:44 schrieb Alan Altmark:
But my experience within IBM is that that we love talking about
technology. In fact, we sometime love it a bit too much, particularly
when it's new and it hasn't completed its evolutionary journey.
That's true. I'm in the software business, and for
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 08:53 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
Could someone give me a clue as to where converter text is defined?
Here are some comments from an exit I wrote in 1990. I don't know how
much of it is still accurate, so take it with a container ship full of
NaCl.
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:44:20 -0600, Alan Altmark wrote:
Don't get me wrong. A machine that was designed to let you change the
underlying hardware design without altering the programming architecture of
the machine was very smart. And way cool. And a major move forward in the
industry.
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:11:37 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
You can do internet searches on ISPF PACK FORMAT and find many entries on it.
You can go to www.ibm.com and search on ISPF PACK and get a lot of information
You can go to ISPF and in the EDIT panel press PF1 (HELP) and find information
I suspect returning to that level of frankness would get you into machine
instruction timings - and all that goes with it. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:17:41 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
Really? I don't think I could work like that. In fact, I have my own
ISPCFIGU module to allow me to go to 32 split screens. I don't often
go beyond about a dozen, but I found 8 to be too limiting.
This is in large part a desperate
In 9653880694947196.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
12/29/2014
at 11:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
If it's well enough documented one might write a filter to support
othe applications.
I suspect that there are 3rd party utilities that
In
ofc877ce3b.427af753-on80257dbd.0062c865-80257dbd.0062e...@uk.ibm.com,
on 12/29/2014
at 06:00 PM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
I suspect returning to that level of frankness would get you into
machine instruction timings - and all that goes with it. :-)
Those were already
On 12/29/2014 10:39 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:13:30 -0600, Joel Ewing wrote:
SWITCH IT OFF may not be a trivial thing to do if you are talking
about a PDS used by multiple users. The edit default for PACKED, like
a number of ISPF edit parameters, is not maintained in
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com (Alan Altmark) writes:
Yet you never hear millicode being applied to storage controllers or
other parts outside of the processor. And you know as well as I do
that they aren't replacing microcode on the processor chips. They're
replacing the OS and the applications
24 matches
Mail list logo
