On 4/04/2015 5:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:47:41 +, Mark Regan wrote:
http://destinationz.org/Community/Evangelizing-Mainframe/March-2015/Open-Source-Support-on-IBM-z-Systems.aspx
Thanks,
Where I read:
... From endian ... issues, ...
Which will increase as
Thank you for posting this example.
This IMHO could not be derived from:
citation
Whereas in previous versions of ECOBOL a minimum and maximum record length
did not have to be specified when defining a variable file, v5.1 will
return a file status of '04'
if any record is less than or greater
Is there some tool or technique for determining by date which SMF record
(type 70 or 89) is missing, so you can exclude just that portion and not
the entire month?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
S. Veryl Ellis ▪ Senior Systems Engineer ▪ Sungard Availability Services
401 North Broad
On 4 April 2015 at 02:09, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
If you read what van Rossum said he was quite happy for python to run on
EBCDIC machines he just didn't want the EBCDIC patches littering the Python
source code and suggested maintaining a seperate patch.
Well that's not
I am not quite sure what you are asking. Is it to eliminate products from Scrt?
Could you provide any error messages or examples?
Lizette
-Orjiginal Message-
From: Veryl Ellis veryl.el...@sungardas.com
Sent: Apr 4, 2015 7:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SCRTTOOL053 Error
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4 and 0C7 - ASRA Abends,
Storage Violations, and one CICS Task abended
Veryl Ellis wrote:
Is there some tool or technique for determining by date which SMF record (type
70 or 89) is missing, so you can exclude just that portion and not the entire
month?
Look in manual for SCRT in this URL
essteam at juno.com wrote:
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog. I dont understand this
new paradyne.
Neither me.
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
Have them remove those 'new functionality' until they fix the source of those
abends on a sandbox.
Please send us the name of the company. First, so the IBM sales person can get
right over there and make a nice commission, and secondly, so I can sell any
stock I may have in the company.
If they have management that is that ill-informed and, well frankly, stupid (I
tried to not use that
On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4 and 0C7 - ASRA Abends,
10 matches
Mail list logo
