On 17 Apr 2015 16:14:16 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:14:54 -0500, Roger Suhr wrote:
Somebody's got to pay for these books. Are you?
Indirectly, yes.
I use the redbooks to help stay current. Then I can answer customers queries
better - they maybe go on to
The books are great and I don't mind the ads, but I do have a thought:
Since the RedBooks are strictly for IBM hardware and Software or products that
run on IBM hardware... when was the last time you looked at the MLC bill your
company received?
Cheers,
Jon Butler
I
have three (quit complex) FORTRAN load modules which I do not have the
source code of. I Know the Source company, but they deal with Cobol, and I
need Fortran.
Any idea how to reverse engineering the load modules?
ITschak
Mr. Ross,
Is there going to be a corresponding PACKCHECK compiler option? It is=20
We have no plans for one, but we are very open to suggestions. I have
wondered for years how a customer could actually migrate from NUMPROC(NOPFD)
to NUMPROC(PFD), and something like that would help. Please
Liz
You were right and IBM site did had some hiccup.
On 17 Apr 2015 18:39, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
What are the control cards for SMP/E you are using?
Have you checked to see if the IBM website is having issues? Sometimes
when doing Network receives, IBM FTP Website
I usually try to have two IBM FTP sites for downloads available - the primary
and an alternate. Sometimes the alternate site will be less difficult.
I think it would be nice if there was some way for IBM to let the job know the
FTP process is having issues from their end.
Lizette
Hi Ed,
If you will be using the FTP JES interface, I suggest you review our RACF Tips
newsletter article on this topic.
http://www.rshconsulting.com/racftips/RSH_Consulting__RACF_Tips__April_2010.pdf
Regards, Bob
-Original Message-
Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:34:16 -0400
From:Rob
