We still see mainframes associated with old reel tapes and card sorters!! Not
as bad as Manx but still.
Annoys me enough to reply while in EU and paying for data by the MB.
Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf errots.
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Charles Mills
Hi
In some of the older threads somebody mentioned that there is a Lionel
Dycks Macro which does this Check. Not sure which macro it is ?
On Sunday 27 September 2015, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> Each parmlib member has different syntax rules - That is why there is
>
Each parmlib member has different syntax rules - That is why there is
probably not a general parm checker.
I have not looked a z/OSMF to see if it helps with these members.
The best I do is use the HILITE function in ISPF to see if there is anything
obvious, like missing commands or
At least no one suggests it was a hanging chad.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Stevet wrote:
> We still see mainframes associated with old reel tapes and card sorters!! Not
> as bad as Manx but still.
>
> Annoys me enough to reply while in EU and paying for data by the MB.
I would think that searching on CBTTAPE.ORG for things like PARM or PARMLIB or
CHECK or CHECKER
Might be beneficial.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:16
Model 204:
The Bank of Nova Scotia (under VM)
Becker's
The Canadian Depository and Clearing Corporation
To name but 3.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Anthony Thompson
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 02:48
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re:
I am not aware of any parmlib checkers.
Some members I use the HILITE function for REXX to try and observe what might
be incorrect.
What member or members are you interested in?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>
In
,
on 09/27/2015
at 01:58 PM, Nathan Astle said:
>Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
I've used IBM's; it's limitied, but good for what it does.
--
Shmuel
In <20150926225738.c4d3cf58...@smtp.patriot.net>, on 09/26/2015
at 07:01 PM, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
said:
>In <769b2e18f7b2fa48b3adea85570a2876c11ac...@mtl-hq-x01.cn.ca>, on
>09/25/2015
> at 08:41 PM, Leonardo Vaz said:
>>That means I
vbc...@gmail.com (Vince Coen) writes:
> I think the stats on migration failures show that many fail regardless
> of the target migration mainly is that they over estimate project
> time, and quality of the target systems being used in place of m/f.
>
> Taking a straight view the mainframe is slow
LPALSTXX PROGXX
On Sunday 27 September 2015, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> I am not aware of any parmlib checkers.
>
> Some members I use the HILITE function for REXX to try and observe what
> might be incorrect.
>
> What member or members are you interested in?
>
> Lizette
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:58:45 +0530, Nathan Astle wrote:
>Hi
>
>Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
>Especially a isredit macro freeware ?
>
This is not a parmlib syntax checker as such, but you may want to check out
'SYS1.SAMPLIB(SPPINST)'
Yes, it is BS. But posting about it on this list is what we in the US call
"preaching to the choir."
What do we DO about it? Did you read my OP below?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Vince Coen
Sent: Sunday,
Hi
Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
Especially a isredit macro freeware ?
Is there someone who can share the macro ?
Nathan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Well that is what we call in the UK a load of BS.
Cobol or for that matter any programming language used for applications
has no bearing on the security of any system or systems.
Much more is the security procedures in place of any system that is
exposed to the internet directly or
I think the stats on migration failures show that many fail regardless
of the target migration mainly is that they over estimate project time,
and quality of the target systems being used in place of m/f.
Taking a straight view the mainframe is slow compared to running on
servers on a
The big one in that is the Australian Federal Government's CentreLink. They are
attempting to replace a mainframe-based solution with a SAP solution.
The then Federal Treasurer, the esteemed Mr. Joe Hocking (now out on his arse
after we got a new Prime Minister), claimed it was because the
17 matches
Mail list logo