Two LPARS don't share the virtual tape
Both the sites have there own virtual tape hardware.
On Mon 19 Nov, 2018, 11:52 AM Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM <
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
> In which vitual tape system is the tape? In a TS77xx, attached to both
> LPARs, both LPARs can access the ta
In which vitual tape system is the tape? In a TS77xx, attached to both LPARs,
both LPARs can access the tape.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kees Vernooij
KLM Information Services
z/OS Systems
Tel +31 6 10 14 58 78
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LI
This time frame is also a bit off.
The Dual Address Space architecture was first implemented via a
microcode
retrofit on the existing old 3033 hardware. It was not possible to make
that
hardware do I-Fetch from primary while running in secondary ASC mode,
so the architecture had to stat
On 11/18/2018 5:27 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
PC-SS was introduced prior to MVS/XA (pre-1980)
Data spaces were introduced with MVS/ESA (1987-ish), stacking PC's at the
same time.
We never used PC-ss prior to ESA/390 primarily because of a hardware
restriction that forced the code to always be in
Hello Gadi,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:58:16 +, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
>
>Message CTTCBR13 is not documented anywhere.
>
I think that you could find the CTT message in a manual called INCONTROL for
z/OS
Messages Manual.
>
>Why do I have to restart OAM for the Virtual volume to be added?
>
Sorry I d
ln -s command..(refer the USS manual)
On Sun 18 Nov, 2018, 8:31 PM Vinoth M Hi All,
>
> We are building a new system and it’s a different setup on OMVS part, we
> are making SYSPLEX Sharing as NO and we have most of /Dev /etc are mounted
> on /System.
>
> Now we need to have the mount points be i
Hi All,
We are building a new system and it’s a different setup on OMVS part, we
are making SYSPLEX Sharing as NO and we have most of /Dev /etc are mounted
on /System.
Now we need to have the mount points be in /SYSTEM directory with /apps and
/flocl being
Sym links with /SYSTEM.
Can you please g
Time flies when you're having fun.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 5:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: System level coding examples
1999, so not goin
I believe the certificate handshake comes ahead of the PASS request, so I
*think* you have a password problem, not a certificate problem (on z/OS).
You really need to straighten out the certificate problem. There is a reason
the TLS protocol requires that the certificate and domain names match.
In article <4217648717106148.wa.supportdunnitsys@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> Hi all,
> We have a hosted domain which includes an FTP server. In the past, z/OS'
> batch FTP client's GETs and PUTs to our server worked just fine. Today, I
> started FileZilla client on Windows and when I logged
1999, so not going to cover PC-ss, for example.
...
Or 64-bit, or relative jumps, or dataspaces, ...
I didn't look at the book so I have no idea what it does or does not
contain, but your time frame is off.
PC-SS was introduced prior to MVS/XA (pre-1980)
Data spaces were introduced with MVS/ES
Hi all,
We have a hosted domain which includes an FTP server. In the past, z/OS' batch
FTP client's GETs and PUTs to our server worked just fine. Today, I started
FileZilla client on Windows and when I logged in, got suddenly prompted by
FileZilla client regarding an "UNKNOWN CERTIFICATE". Rece
I have the 2nd edition of the book. It does cover data and hiper spaces. They
are in the Extended Addressibility section. If memory serves, data spaces were
introduced in the 1990s with MVS/ESA 4.x or 5 and Hiperspaces were around
before that.
The section on Inter Address Space Communications h
13 matches
Mail list logo
