I have never liked the distraction of a crosshair cursor.
The one exception was 3 decades ago, using a 4-in-1 3290 screen in the ops
bridge, where it was sometimes not easy to keep track of which of the 4
screens was 'active', which the crosshair did actually make it a lot more
obvious than the
No cross-hairs for me (in this context). I think it looks hideodeous. If
I don't know where the cursor is, I just put it where I want it to be.
Now I have experience with all kinds of sysprogs and sysadmins that love to
restrict every feature and impose their will on every possible option; but
Tony,
Yep we did that also, when put out networks in.
It took to build a schema flexible enough to support 56 Internaltional
sites and all their LUs.
Scott
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 4:00 PM Tony Harminc wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 11:40, Jesse 1 Robinson
> wrote:
>
> When VTAM/SNA went to
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:00:02 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>In the mid 1990s, when SNA interconnection between enterprises was at its
>peak, IBM had an SNA network name registry. (For all I know they may still
>have it.) Names were of the form character customer code>, so e.g. IBM itself was USIBM
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 11:40, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
When VTAM/SNA went to Multi Systems Networking Facility (MSNF) in the
> 1980s, shops suddenly needed to take the whole world into account when
> exposing heretofore 'private' node names. Most shops had a SYSA, which
> would not do when
No, and no.
No, there is no z/OS system which work on z14, but would not work on EC12.
Note: z9 is different (much older) animal - it is not possible to IPL
z/OS 2.2+ (I'm not sure about 2.1) on z9. BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE.
No, I don't refer to any "ALS". To be precise, for any mainframe OS
Happy New Year all
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
> I do.
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of zMan
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 10:46 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Crosshair cursor
>
> Does
I do.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
zMan
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Crosshair cursor
Does anybody here voluntarily use a crosshair cursor in your 3270 emulator?
--
zMan -- "I've got a
We have our own CI, using GIT, she and rspec, so I am always curious on
technique Gil, thx.
Scott
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:10 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:54:08 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>
> >
> >Paul, do you have a
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:54:08 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>
>Paul, do you have a sample?
>
>(This would actually anable something for me.)
>
I have nothing in use that I can share, but something like:
#! /bin/sh -x
submit <
K NUMBER IN USA :',
10,8,Y4T,WEEKNUM=USA,80:X)
//*
The output of this is
CURRDATE IN GREGORIAN FORMAT :20181231
CURRDATE IN JULIAN FORMAT:2018365
CURRENT DAY OF WEEK :MONDAY
CURRENT WEEK NUMBER IN USA :53
LASTDAY OF CURRENT WEEK(GREGORI
Gil,
Same here I use Linux a lot , love see what you did, I do some stuff in
oRexx on z/PDT ...
Scott
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:54 AM Martin Packer
wrote:
>
> Paul, do you have a sample?
>
> (This would actually enable something for me.)
>
> Thanks, Martin
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 31
FYI,
Our long national nightmare is over. You can now go back to using
www.ibmlink.ibm.com. Not sure when the hostage crisis ended, but it
works again.
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On 12/31/2018 11:12 AM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 12/30/2018 9:37 PM, David Cole wrote:
Thanks Tom! That is exactly what I was looking for.
I also want to thank a couple of people who sent me off-list messages,
but they'd prefer to remain anonymous.
I wondered how we never found this.
The answer
Paul, do you have a sample?
(This would actually enable something for me.)
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 31 Dec 2018, at 16:01, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 08:29:19 +, Sean Gleann wrote:
>>
>> As for "This is the
Batch symbols were introduced in z/OS 2.1.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
When VTAM/SNA went to Multi Systems Networking Facility (MSNF) in the 1980s,
shops suddenly needed to take the whole world into account when exposing
heretofore 'private' node names. Most shops had a SYSA, which would not do when
everyone began interconnecting.
IBM's recommendation at the
On 12/30/2018 9:37 PM, David Cole wrote:
Thanks Tom! That is exactly what I was looking for.
I also want to thank a couple of people who sent me off-list messages,
but they'd prefer to remain anonymous.
I wondered how we never found this.
The answer turned out to be a simple one. The macro
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 08:29:19 +, Sean Gleann wrote:
>
>As for "This is the sort of thing that should be routinely provided by the
>OS." - a huge YES! to that, and other associated values like 'first working
>day of the week/month/year' and so on.
>Its a crying shame that the only other way of
You are referring to a "architectural level set".
I don’t have the details, but some OS'es will not support the hardware.
Some hardware will not support the OS;es.
E.G. z/OS 2.3 is not supported on z9 (I doubt it would work).
z/VM is your friend. You can mimic older hardware.
HTH,
It is possible, despite what you mean exactly.
It is possible to set up some LPAR on EC12 and start here any z/OS (or
other OS) currently working on z14. It is possible to start vanilla new
OS on the EC12.LPAR.
Caution: possible does not mean legal. In theory starting licensed
software on
Found it here: SYS1.SISPMACS(ISPDSTAT)
.*$MAC(ISPDSTAT) COMP(04021): ISPF Directory Entry mapping macro
.*
.* DESCRIPTIVE-NAME = ISPF Directory Entry mapping macro
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe Systems
Which Macro?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Mapping macro for ISPF statistics in PDS Directory entries?
I found this macro in the ISPF maclib. It's
z/OS 2.2 and above allow use of system symbols in batch. See the SYSSYM=ALLOW
parameter of JOBDEF and JOBCLASS in the JES manuals.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
scott Ford
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 12:37 PM
To:
I'm sorry, I should have been more clear...I mean of course the 'vector
graphics' (a.k.a APA) that was supported by devices like the 3179G.
Happy New Year, too.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
>Do customers typically add their own SYS type symbols
I expect not. They should not.
My point was that we could safely add a symbol starting with SYS but could
not safely add a symbol such as due to the compatibility
concerns that a customer might have done so and our definition could cause
Just for clarification:
No, we don't IPL daily - apologies for my poor wording.
My use of IEASYMU2 creates two 'new' system symbols 'PRYYMMDD' and
'PRYYDDD' after IPL, but then I change the values in those symbols at about
00:01 each day.
As for "This is the sort of thing that should be routinely
27 matches
Mail list logo
