Thank you Sir, I shall dig into this!
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Bishop
Sent: 21 February 2019 02:30
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Is there an HCD for Dummy's book anywhere?
Hi
Allan Staller wrote:
>If so, I need to get my 2.3 order in before I can no longer do so.
Why not order it now? I can't think of any downside as long as you're
already licensed.
Timothy
Hi Vignesh,
to generate CHPID/CNTLUNIT/IODEVICE/EDT etc. statements as necessary, which are
then input to the batch IOCP/MVSCP import job. Of course the sky's the limit
with edit macros.
I've tried to attach a sample; it's my first time so let's see if I did it
right. It builds various
On 2/20/2019 1:47 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I think the announcement for z/OS V2.4 may be out in a month or two. Just a
guess. But I can say it is not available now.
Haha! Whatever it's gonna be called, it had better be announced before
SHARE! Otherwise, we'll be cancelling some sessions!
I think the announcement for z/OS V2.4 may be out in a month or two. Just a
guess. But I can say it is not available now.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Using the term "RACF-authorized" is incorrect in this context. All
modules loaded in the address space must be program-controlled (not
authorized), which means they must be covered by a PROGRAM profile that
includes a group member for the dataset from which they were loaded.
The fact that a
Currently we're handling our hardware or site level disaster recovery with an
essentially cold machine in an alternate site, a CBU entitlement allows us to
spin it up and run recoveries. We've been pitched CMP (Country multiplex
pricing) because there is a potential requirement to be able to
In memory of OS/390, maybe, Z os 3.4?
1.3 then 2.4... remember?
Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct
mistaks
> On Feb 20, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Beverly Caldwell wrote:
>
> Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only going to be the same old
>
I would suggest using a reusable LX and then make sure the caller can
locate the sequence number as easily as the PC number(s)
If you're likely to restart and re-connect, there is little benefit to a
reusable System LX (this is unlike the case for a non-system LX for which
there is
As the OP, I don’t care what they call it either.
I only care for planning reasons.
Since I have older hardware I need to know if I can migrate 2.2 --> 2.4 or need
migrate 2.2 --> 2.3
If so, I need to get my 2.3 order in before I can no longer do so.
Actually I looked at past preview
Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only going to be the same old
thing we have been dealing with for the last how many years now?. A tweak
here, a twiddle there.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM <
kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote:
> Is it named V2.4 or V3.1
On 2/18/2019 11:42 PM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM wrote:
Is it named V2.4 or V3.1 or ...?
Though highly likely, it is indeed quite presumptuous to assume it will
remain version 2.
The few references I saw about the z/OS version after 2.3 was named "the z/OS
version after 2.3".
Thanks,
Looks interesting.
Do you happen to have a job to assemble and link the program and run the
program?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Minoru Massaki
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:35:16 +0200, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>The confusion might be caused by text in lower case. Clist is mainly
>uppercase language.
>
Please identify the line containing the suspected lower case in the
voluminous text below.
>בתאריך יום ד׳, 20 בפבר׳ 2019, 0:34, מאת Seymour J
Thanks Chip, that's exactly what I was trying to accomplish.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
IBM-MAIN automatic digest system
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 12:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Feb 2019 to 19 Feb 2019 (#2019-50)
This email
Do I understand correctly that TSOEXEC CALL creates a new subtask
environment which is "insulated" from the goings-on in the mother task?
Would specifying TASKLIB further ensure that only those modules
loaded/linked/attached from the TASKLIB library need be RACF-authorized?
Or is there something
Hello,
You may use CBRSPLCS program to change volume category.
The CBRSPLCS source program is in SYS1.SAMPLIB with member name CBRSPLCS.
You have to Assemble and Linkedit to generate load module of CBRSPLCS.
If you are using DFSMSrmm, EDGSPLCS RMM utility can be used same as
CBRSPLCS.
Regards,
There may be a few more variables to consider here to understand all the
differences. I certainly can't remember all the nuances off the top of my head.
I would think the logmode used might affect what the ATTN (ESC) key does (and
SYS-REQ). SNA supports it whereas NON-SNA does not. Then
Hi,
I have a lot of volumes that need to be altered.
They have the wrong category assigned.
If I use the alter command in the ISMF MOUNTABLE TAPE VOLUME LIST panel, the
volume is assigned the correct category.
How can I do this on a list of volumes? There are currently about 400 volumes I
need
Thanks Attila, but in both our cases the keyboard is definitely in the unlocked
state when we are editing / writing code in the ISPF editor, so any difference
in response that depends on locked vs unlocked isn't at issue here. It's the
differing response to the "same" AID key (Attention) when
20 matches
Mail list logo
