We do that with our products as well, but what we found recently is that it
won't keep some other vendor (or authorized task) from writing over your area.
You're safe from most everything else.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Back in June 2018 there was discussion on this list that indicated that
the forward progress on a subcapacity processor is suspended
sufficiently often for a small time interval (4 µsec?) to degrade the
average SU capacity of the processor to the licensed value. It would
seem logical to assume
ITshak,
toda rabah
Scott
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 2:59 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Once you created the name tokennpair you cant modify it. So first get the
> storage. Now that you have the address create a name token while pointig to
> a 16 bytes area you stored the address . This is what we
Once you created the name tokennpair you cant modify it. So first get the
storage. Now that you have the address create a name token while pointig to
a 16 bytes area you stored the address . This is what we do in IronSphere
at Ipl using a subsystem. Later callers can acesys the global block of
John,
I know CEA plays a role in zosmf, I have played with ZOSMF and z/OS 2.3
coupled with Postman as a tester. I sent jobs end and retrieved the output
Scott
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:18 AM John McKown
wrote:
> I find it very interesting that these services are AMODE(64) only and
> designed
All:
I have a storage related question. I need a running program (STC) to
allocate a piece of storage that has persistence. By this I mean when the
STC shutdowns the storage is still there and available. The storage is an
area we want to use to store Global options for some of our code running.
Just to make sure I myself haven't caused any confusion, as previously stated,
irrespective of the type of processor i.e SAP, CP, ICF, IFL, zIIP (and systems
which had zAAP) the 'speed/cycle time' of ALL the different processor types is
always the SAME (this includes sub-capacity CPs). Only
ZIIP and ZAAP processors always run at full speed, even when running on a
sub-capacity box.
One thing, among many, I don't know is how IBM implements sub-capacity. Slow
the clock speed? Skip cycles?
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Syncsort, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Thanks at work we were looking to trace some huge Assembler programs initially
debug tool was used and it ran it into lots of problems I have been using test
test because it’s not a source level debugger has less issues and runs smoother
the programs are really old and I doubt there are many
Or maybe it was ICFs. But, again, not quite 20 years. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
>for maybe 20 years
Not quite 20 years, but getting there . zAAPs were introduced in
about 2004.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
One regular misconception about (cycle time), irrespective of the type of
processor the 'speed/cycle time' of ALL the processors is the SAME. CPs with
CAPACITY setting of 7xx (Zxx in case of the 'BC' class system) are FULL
capacity. Others are sub-capacity. So if the workload system hasn't
12 matches
Mail list logo
