Cross Posted
Hi,
Is there a way to calculate the USSTAB screen length and resolutions using
a EXCEL and using which we can directly use them to assemble and linkedit ?
I have heard this long time back where one of the shop were using EXCEL to
build the USSTAB. Is there anyone still using and
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:33:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>My understanding is that he needs ISPF services in his application.
Then he is probably not going to be able to get it to run, safely and with
integrity, under TSO/E. It will need a multi-address space implementation
unless he's very
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:45:14 +0200, Steff Gladstone
wrote:
>But if I TSOEXEC CALL the Cobol I/O routine, will it retain the context
>between calls? Won't the DCBs and ACBs and working storage be reinitialized
>on every call?
You need to TSOEXEC CALL the main COBOL program. It must run isolated,
I did not. Wish I had thought to do that.
Thanks for the reminder though.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:28 PM Mark Pace wrote:
> This is a test system where no one is allowed except me.
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:53 PM Elardus Engelbrecht <
> elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
>
>> Mark
This is a test system where no one is allowed except me.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:53 PM Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Mark Pace wrote:
>
> >I checked in RACF and I had no rules protecting the SYS3 datasets, so I
> don't think that was the issue.
>
> No 'rules'?
Did you press F1 after getting RC=08 in ISMF. Sometimes you can get a better
explanation that way.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I just looked in bitsavers and to my dismay they don't have any VM/SE manuals.
For that matter, they don't have any MVS/SE manuals either. If anyone here has
any of them, please consider donating scans to them.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
great! the SYS3 dataset still may have caused the issue if you're in a protect
all configuration.
I still have the notes from z/os 1.3 on how to recreate a SCDS from an ACDS.
good stuff and good that it's still a valid fix !
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Pace"
Phil Smith III demonstrated his ignorance by writing
> Rexx wasn't available yet, doh
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/VM_SP/Release_3.0_Jul83/SC24-5239-0_VM_SP_Interpreter_Reference_Rel_3_Sep83.pdf
> Stephenson went back to S/360
Yes, but EXEC2 didn't.
> when men were men and systems were
Mark Pace wrote:
>I checked in RACF and I had no rules protecting the SYS3 datasets, so I don't
>think that was the issue.
No 'rules'? This is not looking good, but then, it should probably not affect
your issue, AFAIK.
Do you have any profiles defined at all or have something in the Global
I fixed it, but not sure why/how it wasn't working.
At some point I remember my SYS1.DFSMS.SCDS was missing the correct
configuration. The ACDS was correct, but I wasn't sure how to get it
retrieve in to an SCDS. I finally remembered that I could save the ACDS
into a new SCDS. That became
YW! WOW that's a lot of 'stuff'
hope you get it figured out, let us know
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Pace"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 10:49:57 AM
Subject: Re: ISMF msg
Thanks for the pointer. Now to figure out what it is
I cannot use FTP, only the SXMPE Internet Service Retrieval.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE Internet Service
Thanks for the pointer. Now to figure out what it is telling me.
11:47 Start of ISPF Log - - - - Session # 1580
---
11:48 * ISMF ERROR * - DGTUV034 APPLICATION(DGT6 - SG);
FUNCTION(VOLUME)
11:48-
some if the ISMF messages may have just gone to the ISPF log, you may wnat to
check 7.5 to see if the log is active and if any messages are there , just a
thought
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Pace"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019
I'm NOT running HSM.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:37 AM Mark Pace wrote:
> I'm running HSM, no started task to look at.
>
> I'll check on my TSO profile.
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:22 AM Lizette Koehler
> wrote:
>
>> Sometime the messages come back to the tso session when using ISMF.
>>
>>
I'm running HSM, no started task to look at.
I'll check on my TSO profile.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:22 AM Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> Sometime the messages come back to the tso session when using ISMF.
>
> Check your TSO PROFILE and make sure you are not suppressing them
>
> You could also check
Yes, it was initialized as SMS and it's online.
INIT UNIT(B052) VOLID(TTMP02) -
NOVFY DEVTYPE(3390) PRG STGR VTOC(0,1,104) INDEX(7,0,45)
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE SS
B052 3390 O TTMP02 PRIV/RSDNT 0
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:19 AM Carmen Vitullo
Sometime the messages come back to the tso session when using ISMF.
Check your TSO PROFILE and make sure you are not suppressing them
You could also check the DFHSM STC Task for the messages, they could be there
as well.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
is the volume online to the system you are trying to add?
was init INIT'd as SMS ?
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Pace"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 10:15:41 AM
Subject: ISMF msg
I'm trying to add a new volume to a storage pool.
I'm trying to add a new volume to a storage pool.
When I try to add I get this message on the Panel - SMS RETCODE: 8
Searching google it points to ARC0940I - which tells me to look are
preceding ARCxxx messages. I am not seeing any ARC messages on the console
or system log. I thought
I use a lot of 6V #44 and #47 bayonet base light bulbs in my pinball machine
hobby (sickness).
Dana
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:57:23 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>Sorry Jesse,
>
>I lived in the USA for five years and found that Edison screw light bulbs
>get stuck in the socket, plus there is no
>If PDSE solves the issue, what reason do they have to update JES3?
I am not requesting an update to JES3. I am requesting that JES2 be updated to
include a function that has been available in JES3 for a long time.
>I'd prefer to see greater compatibility between PDSE and UNIX directories:
On 8/03/2019 8:57 am, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
It's Friday and I've packed all my converter gadgets for Share in Phoenix.
If you are there, I'll buy you a beer. I'm sure your beer tastes the same.
David Mierowsky will be there if you want to buy him a beer Wayne!
If that’s the case, assuming you can reorder the product, if not, then run a
BUILDMCS from the Distribution zone, and then my personal choice would be to
delete the FMID entirely, running the sample below, and then received and apply
either the reordered product, or the BUILDMCS generated
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:16:10 +1300, Laurence Chiu wrote:
>But we have a number of batch jobs that calls CICS transactions in those
>regions and we are wondering what happens if the batch job is running in a
>LPAR where the region isn't.
>
>Will it abend or will MRO work out to send the work to
Lol... The US is in the midst of a craft beer craze, so you may be able to
find some acceptable brews. I judge beer on how closely it resembles a
glass of Coors at 34F, so you'll need others for advice on that.
As for power, an accident with 110V is less likely to invoke a life
insurance payout
I think you'll want to ask this question in the CICS list.
https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CICS-L
Cheers,
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
28 matches
Mail list logo
