Remember you can't just say give me 20G, you have to make sure that it's there
when you make the changes. Did you close and open /tmp? Even then, do you
have the memory or page space to support the 20GB, if not then you will not get
a good result from that setting.
Brian
This is working beautifully, actually. I selected "Email updates to me"
for this thread as a test and have received an email to my Google inbox
for every subsequent response. My Google email goes to my phone, which
then also notifies my Fitbit, so I'm suddenly hyper-aware of everybody's
Thanks
Basically trying to determine from the eqamodin which specifies a self
modifying instruction if the adata produced has a location or statement number
of the self modified code
Thanks
> On Mar 17, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Appendix C of the HLASM P/G. (Who'd have
Appendix C of the HLASM P/G. (Who'd have guessed?) I would post a link but I
am offline as I write this.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mike LaMartina
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 9:17 AM
To:
I have Outlook arranging IBM-MAIN e-mails by thread but I cannot describe how I
got it to do that.
I can delete an entire thread that does not interest me with two clicks, and I
can follow a thread that does without jumping around.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:32:42 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>They got rid of Unformatted System Services?
>
Just the abbreviation. Perhaps they'd rather not take sides. Did the
abbreviation appear in an older Glossary? Wayback Machine? BitSavers?
>On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Paul Gilmartin
They got rid of Unformatted System Services?
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0400, scott Ford wrote:
>
> >Very funny Rad ..USS wars is about right ...lol
> >
> >On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:27 PM
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0400, scott Ford wrote:
>Very funny Rad ..USS wars is about right ...lol
>
>On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:27 PM R.S. wrote:
>
>> OK, who start "USS is not Unix System Services" war?
>> Don't forget about "it's UNIX, not Unix" and "official acronym".
>> Of course all the
Very funny Rad ..USS wars is about right ...lol
Scott
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:27 PM R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2019-03-12 o 20:14, David Magee pisze:
> > ...phrase.
>
> OK, who start "USS is not Unix System Services" war?
> Don't forget about "it's UNIX, not Unix" and "official acronym".
> Of
If you use Outlook, you may be able to work something out using Microsoft Flow.
A bit overcomplicating, maybe, but it is likely doable.
Otherwise, the idea of adding a constant string to the subject and then relying
on a static Outlook rule seems the simplest.
Re: [keywordman] Highly technical
Hi Jake,
One of the segment in hsm is expanding but not sure if this will be a problem
for you since the issue affects the sharing LPAR. So, if you have more than one
LPAR and one of these is upgraded; then, a toleration PTF has to be applied to
the LPAR that does not upgrade; otherwise, a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 07:42:02 -0500, Vinoth Meenakshi
wrote:
>when i searched for reason code 0594003D its sounds
>
>BPXFVLKP 10/27/17
>
>JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found
>
>
Take care about TMP directory.
You need to have sufficient space for unzipped file and temporary
directory as well.
AFAIK there is some ServerPac dialog setting to point proper directory,
not system default.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-03-17 o 10:55, Peter pisze:
I
I almost gave 20g.. ok let me increase and try
On Sun, 17 Mar, 2019, 1:53 PM Field, Alan,
wrote:
> Enter TSO command BPXMTEXT E329
>
> It responds File too large
>
> So yes your TMP file system is probably too small to handle the file.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
Enter TSO command BPXMTEXT E329
It responds File too large
So yes your TMP file system is probably too small to handle the file.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Hi
While I was doing the restore step of serverpac(zOS 2.3) on STEP1 for
unzipping the OMVS I received an error as
GIM43501S ** THE CALL TO THR BPX1WRT SERVICE FAILED WHEN PROCESSING
/tmp/smpe/root.100.pax.Z.
THE RETURN CODE WAS '0077'X AND THE REASON CODE WAS 'E329'.
Is it because the
Hi
Are there any specific issue faced while running RMM and HSM on z/OS 2.3 ?
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
17 matches
Mail list logo
