Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

These LPARs do share a master catalog. LOADxx syscat has the same parm on both LPARs A listcat of the master shows the alias entry ALIAS -,SYS7.R30 Thanks, Elaine -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Another STORAGE OBTAIN question.

On 6/10/2019 8:44 AM, John McKown wrote: Thanks for the pointer on where to look. I am trying to stay as GUPI as possible in this code. Haha! You can't get much more "GUPI" than issuing the LPTEA instruction. LOL -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El

Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

If I understand correctly, there are two master catalogs--one for each LPAR--and one shared user catalog pointed to independently by the two mcats. As others have said, the catalog configuration for both LPARs must be *exactly* the same, including the SYSCAT parameter in LOADxx. It's also

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

> Key0 is much much more dangerous than supervisor state (IMHO) Interesting. I never thought of that, but I agree. Which is the more likely error? - You accidentally code some privileged instruction that you did not intend? - You code the wrong register number in an instruction, or destroy or

Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

The ALIAS definition goes into the MASTER CATALOG. The Alias needs to be defined on every system you want to access it from. On a system where the alias is defined in the master catalog the datasets will be cataloged in the user catalog. On a system where the alias has not been defined in the

Re: Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

Have you ever checked multi level alias definitions in the LOADxx members of both LPARs. There must be a difrence. If so you have to modify wrong one. Best Regards. Bülent Dülger Mainframe IT Specialist ServiZ Information Technologies Inc. > On 10 Jun 2019, at 21:23, Elaine Beal wrote: >

Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen sysplex'd LPARs

I have a 2 LPAR sysplex and a shared user catalog the catalog has only 2 alias entries when I allocate a new dsn (iefbr14) on one of the LPARs, say LPARA, listcat's look as expected but on the other LPARB listcat up to some level of qualifiers the dataset is not listed alias sys7.r30 listcat

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 6/10/2019 8:37 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:13:23 -0700 Ed Jaffe > > > wrote: > > > > :>On 6/9/2019 11:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > > :>> Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an >

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On 6/10/2019 8:37 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:13:23 -0700 Ed Jaffe wrote: :>On 6/9/2019 11:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: :>> Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an altered :>> AKM. :>Altered in what way? ETDEF EKM= Haha! That part is

Re: Another STORAGE OBTAIN question.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:28 AM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 6/10/2019 5:47 AM, John McKown wrote: > > If I do a STORAGE OBTAIN,STARTBDY=20,LOC=(31,PAGEFRAMESIZE1M) is there > any > > way to see if z/OS did indeed use a 1 Meg frame size? I am trying to get > > (and FIX) a contiguous area of real

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:13:23 -0700 Ed Jaffe wrote: :>On 6/9/2019 11:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: :>> Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an altered :>> AKM. :>Altered in what way? ETDEF EKM= -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen

Re: Another STORAGE OBTAIN question.

On 6/10/2019 5:47 AM, John McKown wrote: If I do a STORAGE OBTAIN,STARTBDY=20,LOC=(31,PAGEFRAMESIZE1M) is there any way to see if z/OS did indeed use a 1 Meg frame size? I am trying to get (and FIX) a contiguous area of real storage to use in communicating to z/VM via the DIAG X'08' (Virtual

Re: Sample JCL for full volume restore

Peter - You did not state any of the following information to help you 1) What product are you using for full volume dump 2) Show JCL and Control cards for product 3) Is it a physical or logical dump 4) Did you review the manual for the tool you are using to dump for a RESTORE?

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On 6/9/2019 11:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an altered AKM. Altered in what way? -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

Re: ZOSMF IZUD302E error message

On 6/8/2019 3:41 PM, Bill Giannelli wrote: Hello, I am just now setting up ZOSMF. I am trying to add a software instance for our DB2 SMPE CSI. But I get the error IZUD302E You are not authorized to specify the name unauthorized-name for a software instance on system system-name. Specify a

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:23:46 -0400 Peter Relson wrote: :>Yes there's a way -- creating a PC routine that accomplishes doing so. :>Nothing else is acceptable, although the literal answer would be "LCTL". Will be reset after an interrupt. (At least that was an issue in the past) -- Binyamin

Another STORAGE OBTAIN question.

If I do a STORAGE OBTAIN,STARTBDY=20,LOC=(31,PAGEFRAMESIZE1M) is there any way to see if z/OS did indeed use a 1 Meg frame size? I am trying to get (and FIX) a contiguous area of real storage to use in communicating to z/VM via the DIAG X'08' (Virtual Console Function). In order to work, the

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 7:24 AM Peter Relson wrote: > Yes there's a way -- creating a PC routine that accomplishes doing so. > Nothing else is acceptable, although the literal answer would be "LCTL". > Thanks. I was hoping for a z/OS API. The closest I could find to subvert is SYNCHX to set the

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

Yes there's a way -- creating a PC routine that accomplishes doing so. Nothing else is acceptable, although the literal answer would be "LCTL". Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: dumb STORAGE OBTAIN question.

On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:53 PM Jim Mulder wrote: > If you will have the storage fixed for a longer period of time than you > would want > a CONFIG STOR,OFFLINE to be delayed, then you should specify LONG=YES. > I all my years as a sysprog, back to OS/VS1, I have _never_ had the need to

Yan: Sample JCL for full volume restore

Hi Peter,You can find more details about RESTORE command from "DFSMSdss Storage Administration Reference Guide"Example shows that DASD volume 11 is to be restored from the first data set of standard label tape volumes TAPE01 and TAPE02. //JOB1 JOB accounting

Re: Sample JCL for full volume restore

Assuming you used DFSMSdss, you could start here. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.adru000/lnxdiv6.htm, RON HAWKINS Director, Ipsicsopt Pty Ltd (ACN: 627 705 971) m+61 400029610| t: +1 4085625415 | f: +1 4087912585 -Original Message- From:

Sample JCL for full volume restore

Hi I have backed up an entire volume to a virtual tape device . I would like to test a full volume restore to the same target volume . Does anyone have a working sample JCL so that I can test it ? Peter -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Any way to set the PKM in "open code".

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:15:40 -0400 Rob Schramm wrote: :>I suspect John's answer will be :>1) because it's cool to try new things Well, to do that he could encapsulate this code in a PC-CP with an altered AKM. :>2) because I want to limit the destruction if it goes wrong. Key0 is much much