Cool,
Thanks
Brian
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:16:37 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>SYS1.SAMPLIB(SPPINST) Is the member that provides code to install the SYSPARM
>dialog.
>
>.
>.
>J.O.Skip Robinson
>Southern California Edison Company
>Electric Dragon Team Paddler
>SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
Hi,
During the IPL, The message:
IEA008I SYSTEM PARMS FOLLOW FOR z/OS 02.03.00 HBB77B0
IEASYS0B
IEASYS00
Was displayed.
I then see
IEE252I MEMBER IEASYS00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB
IEA325I IEASYS00 PARAMETER
You cannot, 00 is always used as the base, you can only concatenate
over-rides to it. LOADxx and IEASYMxx will concatenate to 00, and WTOR
response will over-ride LOADxx and IEASYMxx -- but I know of no way to
eliminate 00 as a base. Normally 0B would have all the needed over-ride
values for 00
HI,
The output from D IPLINFO,SYSP is
IEE255I SYSTEM PARAMETER 'SYSP': (0B,00)
I would like it to be only 0B
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Relson
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2020 4:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEASYS
Hi Mark,
That's what I had in mind.
The term NSS, I'm pretty sure, wasn't coined until they were spool files.
Regards,
David
On 2020-10-05 17:33, Mark S Waterbury wrote:
To clarify, what I meant was CP's "saved system" facility that used much the
same mechanisms to define named segments to
To clarify, what I meant was CP's "saved system" facility that used much the
same mechanisms to define named segments to CP, e.g. DMKSNT.
This capability existed even in CP-67 CP, so that users could type "IPL CMS"
for example.
Kirk Wolf wrote:
Can be demonstrated with the following test program. This works fine with
regcomp() on linux and other RE platforms (PCRE, javascript, python, etc).
I dunno why that would fail - tried it with a couple of UNIXs
and of course Dignus Systems/C, all got return-code of 0.
Dave,
NSS were on the scene in VM/370 Rel. 6.
Page 132
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/VM_370/Release_6/GC20-1807-7_VM370_System_Programmers_Guide_Rel_6_4-81.pdf
Joe
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:47 PM David Spiegel
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> IIRC, NSSs didn't come on the scene until much later
Hi Mark,
IIRC, NSSs didn't come on the scene until much later than Vm/370 Rel. 6.
Did you mean DCSS perhaps?
Regards,
David
On 2020-10-05 11:00, Mark S Waterbury wrote:
Hello, IBM mainframe enthusiasts:
Recently we have obtained images of some old tapes containing source code for
the
That's CMS, not CP.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Matthew Donald
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: searching for CP-67 source
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:08:44 +, Jousma, David wrote:
>There is something besides just a permissions problem. Were there additional
>messages besides what you posted?
>
>bpxmtext 0b1b011f
>BPXPREXC 07/01/19
Wendell:
Thank you for the notes.
What happened was that we were specifying TLSPORT=5521 and by just
specifying the TLSPORT it was assuming implicit connection and so neither
server nor client sent the 220 message and they just wait for some reply.
So I commented out the TLSPORT=5521 and just
There is something besides just a permissions problem. Were there additional
messages besides what you posted?
bpxmtext 0b1b011f
BPXPREXC 07/01/19
JRExecNotRegFile: The filename
P AXR works
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Dana
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:56:57 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>Great idea but no joy
>
>
>
>You get AXR0101I SYSTEM REXX (AXR) IS ALREADY ACTIVE
>
FM says you can FORCE AXR,ARM it but that seems a little harsh
--
For
This issue comes up when you wish to add
REXXLIB ADD DSN(xxx.testcopy)
Ahead of xxx, or
REXXLIB ADD DSN(xxx.alllpars) after, or other changes to the AXR concatenation.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Monday, October 05,
We have that as well - we had a need to add an additional library which raised
the question.
Thanks
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John
I'm not well versed in system Rexx, but our setup has the main AXR proc
pointing to an installation library via a member in PARMLIB:
REXXLIB ADD DSN(xxx)
The idea is that local Rexx code lives in the local library so that it can be
updated without having to restart AXR.
.
.
J.O.Skip
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:40:30 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>/* test regcomp with more than 9 (groups).
> On z/OS V2R3, fails with:
> Invalid regular expression '...' - (rc=8) \( \) or ( ) imbalance
>...
>Switching to BREs, doesn't help. Something probably didn't fit in 80 bytes
>:-)
Perhaps
I looked closely at this awjile ago. It appears, that at least at the z/OS 2.1
level, changing the AXR libraries was still an IPL change. Haven't looked at
z/OS 2.3 doc yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Lionel B Dyck
> Sent: Monday, October
Hi,
A user issues /usr/lpp/Printsrv/bin/lpstat -a
and gets:
/usr/lpp/Printsrv/bin: FSUM9209 cannot execute: reason code = 0b1b011f:
EDC5111I Permission denied.
The user is COnnected to AOPADMIN which is PErmitted UPDATE to PRINTSRV
AOP.ADMINISTRATOR
Here are the z/OS V2.3 Files and
No problem with the line length. It's regcomp() that seems broken.
I believe that this is the version of the Open Group spec that IBM is
supposed to be supporting, which mentions no limit on the number of groups
(aka "subexpressions").
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/
On Mon,
One of C's less frequently used features is automatic string literal
concatenation. The expression
"AB" "cd"
will be compiled as
"ABcd"
as long as the components (could be more than two) are separated only by white
space.
So if the problem really is related to line length (your
Great idea but no joy
You get AXR0101I SYSTEM REXX (AXR) IS ALREADY ACTIVE
And the comment is:
Explanation
Try https://github.com/moshix/CP-67-CMS-Source
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 02:01, Mark S Waterbury <
01c3f560aac1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hello, IBM mainframe enthusiasts:
>
> Recently we have obtained images of some old tapes containing source code
> for the original Cambridge
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:43:38 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>I see commands for system rexx (axr) to display the status, list the rexx
>libraries, to start it and to stop it.
>
>
>BUT I don't see a command to cause it to re-read the parmlib member or to
>add a library dynamically.
>
>
Lionel, Does
Can be demonstrated with the following test program. This works fine with
regcomp() on linux and other RE platforms (PCRE, javascript, python, etc).
/* test regcomp with more than 9 (groups).
On z/OS V2R3, fails with:
Invalid regular expression '...' - (rc=8) \( \) or ( ) imbalance
SYS1.SAMPLIB(SPPINST) Is the member that provides code to install the SYSPARM
dialog.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
Hello, IBM mainframe enthusiasts:
Recently we have obtained images of some old tapes containing source code for
the original Cambridge Monitor System (CMS) from CP-67.
We can restore that source under VM/370 Rel. 6 CMS, running on older hardware
or under the Hercules-390 emulator or the new
I see commands for system rexx (axr) to display the status, list the rexx
libraries, to start it and to stop it.
BUT I don't see a command to cause it to re-read the parmlib member or to
add a library dynamically.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website:
I can't help you much on the server side of the equation, but this excerpt from
an FTP client job will get you started:
01 //FTPS EXEC PGM=FTP,REGION=4M,
02 // PARM=('ENVAR("_CEE_ENVFILE_S=DD:STDENV")/10.1.1.1 5521 -e')
03 //STDENV DD *
04 GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=ON
05 //* GSK_TRACE=0x
06
W dniu 05.10.2020 o 12:49, Joseph Winters pisze:
Hello,
We have a couple of 3490 tape cartridges that contain program libraries
(loadlibs) as well as source code. The contents contain a software product
that was last worked on in 2005. We would like to have the tapes converted to
a newer
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 23:53:18 -0500, Brian Westerman
wrote:
>I don't have a sysparm member in sys1.samplib, is it from an older release
>than 2.3?
>
>Brian
>
Have a look in SAMPLIB for the "SPP*" members .
Roger
--
For
Contact me off list. I have an active 3490 on my floor in Florida. I can
create an AWS file that I can then send to you.
If it's a vendor tape, I will need proof of license.
Tony Thigpen
Joseph Winters wrote on 10/5/20 6:47 AM:
Hello,
We have a couple of 3490 tape cartridges that
Hello,
We have a couple of 3490 tape cartridges that contain program libraries
(loadlibs) as well as source code. The contents contain a software product
that was last worked on in 2005. We would like to have the tapes converted to
a newer format. We have access to the IBM Systems
Do a search for PC 3490 drive; if you can't find someone who already has one,
you can buy a drive. I saw one hit that mentioned 9-track; I hadn't realized
that those were still available.
There is software available to convert a tape to AWS format.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Hello,
We have a couple of 3490 tape cartridges that contain program libraries
(loadlibs) as well as source code. The contents contain a software product
that was last worked on in 2005. We would like to have the tapes converted to
a newer format. We have access to the IBM Systems Center
Hello,
We have a couple of 3490 tape cartridges that contain program libraries
(loadlibs) as well as source code. The contents contain a software product
that was last worked on in 2005. We would like to have the tapes converted to
a newer format. We have access to the IBM Systems Center
38 matches
Mail list logo
