If you use DYNAM, then all programs and sub-programs must reside in a LOAD
Library that's concatenated to CICS under DFHRPL.
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
esst...@juno.com
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:20 PM
To:
VB without LBI this would not apply.
F, FB, or VB with LBI this would apply.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 4:01 PM Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> Thank you I’m using VB
>
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 2021, at 4:36 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
> >
> >
On 2/26/2021 2:36 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
sort of the vi of TSO ...
You take that back!! :)
Sorry... I just used vi a minute ago and although I finally remembered
shift-g to move to the bottom, I had to goggle how to move back to the
top. gg Of course! It's so obvious.
March 1971 is almost 50 years ago.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Tony Harminc [t...@harminc.net]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 6:49 PM
To:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 18:37, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> > 40 years ago
> ?
I said "(well, TEST, but the syntax is identical)". And yes, I realize
that each has an only overlapping set of subcommands and functions.
> TEST is older older and TESTAUTH is more recent.
Indeed. But not all *that*
> 40 years ago
?
TEST is older older and TESTAUTH is more recent.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Tony Harminc [t...@harminc.net]
Sent: Friday,
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 02:46, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
> Is the TSO TESTAUTH command still around? I have to admit I can't
> remember ever trying it.
It's still there, and works much the way it did 40 years ago.
I find I use it way more often than I would've expected. In 2021! Part
of it is that I
Thank you I’m using VB
> On Feb 26, 2021, at 4:36 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/len99.htm#len99
>
> Undefined-length records when using LBI or for fixed-length blocked:
> The method described in the following
Be There or Be Square!
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6771082070547591168/
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/len99.htm#len99
Undefined-length records when using LBI or for fixed-length blocked:
The method described in the following paragraphs can be used to
calculate the block length. You can use this method with BSAM,
Hi
If I code a DCBE and specify a large block interface
Larger than that allowed on the DCB
Would anyone know after the I/o is complete
His many bytes are actually read
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Gentlemen,
Thank you all for the answers.
Some background of the question: Sometimes I have to do with IT folks
hostile to mainframe. Isn't it usual? Maybe, but it's boring and
sometimes annoying. Especially when you have to explain mainframe "black
screen" is colorful and it was colorful
One of the best troubleshooters I know was a big photograph of a dog. This
dog had an 80% success rate!
The photo belonged to the expert, and you could only ask the expert once
you had asked the dog.
Of course everyone would roll their eyes, tut and explain their problem to
the dog.
In doing so
Sorry for the "fat fingers", Seymour.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:02 PM Ramsey Hallman
wrote:
> I agree with Syrmour's method. When I am stumped, I'll start an email to
> my boss (the best assembler coder I know) asking what I've done wrong.
> While putting as much information into the email as
I agree with Syrmour's method. When I am stumped, I'll start an email to
my boss (the best assembler coder I know) asking what I've done wrong.
While putting as much information into the email as possible, so he doesn't
think I'm taking the easy way out, 99 times out of 100 I'll find my issue.
Green snow storms. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com
Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast
With regard to Tom's second method, often *I* spot the error when I'm asking
for help and explaining the code. Somehow it seems to sometimes cure a mental
blind spot.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
I doubt that TESTAUTH will ever go away, but I suggest that you look at the HLA
Toolkit or a 3rd party product, since TESTAUTH is pretty barebones.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I really second Tom's latter method. Try walking through the code with someone
else -- explain to them how it works instruction by instruction. I have good
luck with that method using my wife as a sounding board -- even though she
doesn't know L from ST.
I think many respondents are answering
I was working in the IBM Toronto Lab prior to the 3279 announcement and was a
tester for the product (developed at IBM Hursley). Somewhere I have a photo of
myself sitting at my 3279 when I got an award. I still have a copy of a
pre-announce version of a paper on developing colour applications
FYI,
I'm pleased to announce the latest V1R5 release of the CBT Usermod
Collection for ISPF (CUCI), available at
http://www.cbttape.org/ftp/updates/CBT967.zip. V1R5 now satisfies 33
RFE's, after adding the following:
RFE 148758 - ISPF Edit highlighting for Kotlin
RFE 148595 - ISPF Edit
Hi David, Yes believe that would help and uploading that on CBT will definitely
be useful to many others like me.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Hi Ravi, Barbara,
If you want to trace the execution of the program (instead of just one
snapshot (as Barbara is suggesting)), you might want to consider setting
up a SLIP Trap with TRACE, capturing your data with GTF and using IPCS
(via ISPF or Batch) to print the Trace.
I am currently
First check your steplib - and all the libraries in steplib are APF
authorised!
Secondly check binder setting AC
Colin
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 05:57, Ravi Gaur wrote:
> **Positing in Assembler group as well** - However given the activity
> thought to put it in IBM-Main as well.
>
> Writing and
24 matches
Mail list logo
