Mr Ross,
I'm not sure that you guys at IBM have realized that you have created a
nightmare out there in the field for a lot of customers and especially vendors
of COBOL applications. I'm a part of many that support/write Assembler/Cobol
code for a giant Credit Software system. We have 5+
I wrote an assembler UDTF for Db2 that retrieve list of cataloged datasets
based on mask/type using the CSI.
Can share it if you are interested.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:43:05 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>...
>If only COBOL had "tagged redefines" (see also "tagged unions", "sum types",
>"variant types" and many other names for the same idea).
>
Like ALGOL 68 conforms-to-and-becomes?
>
>
>From: Tom Ross
[Default] On 12 Mar 2021 09:34:42 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com (Frank Swarbrick) wrote:
>Thanks for this info. Makes me feel better (for whatever reason).
>We actually had some guesses that the issue was caused by migrating from COBOL
>V4 to V6, even though that
I am a big fan or Pro/JCL. Especially the feature that lets you simulate
the execution of an entire job stream. It’s an easy way to check that your
DSNs are consistent from job to job, without actually running them.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 15:28 Mitch Mccluhan <
https://twitter.com/wizardofzos/status/1370465804702076932?s=20
Mainframe.community in building SBG3, of 360,000 domain names.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:28 PM Charles Mills wrote:
>
> Is there a mainframe relevance? Not being snarky; inquiring minds want to
> know.
>
> Charles
>
>
On 3/12/2021 3:28 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Is there a mainframe relevance? Not being snarky; inquiring minds want to know.
Plenty!
Quite a few mainframe shops are using TCT (Transparent Cloud Tiering) to
back their data up the cloud (instead of tape) directly from their IBM,
EMC or Hitachi
Is there a mainframe relevance? Not being snarky; inquiring minds want to know.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Strasbourg
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/ovh-fire-update-four-halls-sbg1-destroyed-well-all-sbg2/
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Folks,
As an FYI, J-MAN makes it possible to work on a "reference model", from which
the tool automatically creates as many target environments as you need, based
on "rules" that describe how to modify the jobs to make them effective for the
specific target environments. Every single keyword
I'd like to IPL stand-alone tape-based utilities from SCSI DVD or via
NVMe instead of mainframe tape. Is it possible?
Has anyone done this?
Thanks,
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Thanks for the input, Tom. I agree with everything you say.
A somewhat ironic thing is it technically isn't "bad data". Rather, it's good
data but only under certain circumstances. That is, there is a redefines
(several, actually), and the condition should have been evaluated only in cases
Thanks for this info. Makes me feel better (for whatever reason).
We actually had some guesses that the issue was caused by migrating from COBOL
V4 to V6, even though that was done months ago. (The "bad code" was added
after the migration, and thus had never run under COBOL V4).
The
>We recently applied patches up through September 2020 to our Enterprise COB=
>OL V6.2 compiler. Prior to this we had patches through September 2019. Th=
>is appears to have changed how some code is generate, even though the compi=
>ler options have not changed.
Frank, this is unfortunate, but
On 3/12/2021 10:14 AM, Yuan Jie Song wrote:
IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Go makes available the popular and
industry-standard Go (or Golang) programming language to z/OS users. Go is a
general-purpose programming language for building large-scale complex software,
and is the language of cloud
[Default] On 11 Mar 2021 11:52:56 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com (Frank Swarbrick) wrote:
>We recently applied patches up through September 2020 to our Enterprise COBOL
>V6.2 compiler. Prior to this we had patches through September 2019. This
>appears to have
Hi Sorry, No.. I opened an issue with IBM, and they told me DFHSM will
eventually backup the file, Because I did a List BCDS on the dataset and it was
backed up.
They just fill the logs with failures, instead of giving a RC=4, Warning about
the backup.
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems
IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Go makes available the popular and
industry-standard Go (or Golang) programming language to z/OS users. Go is a
general-purpose programming language for building large-scale complex software,
and is the language of cloud infrastructure such as Kubernetes, Open
That is wonderful and thank you for your help. Is it possible for you to
send contact info to me ? Privately is fine...
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:06 AM Charles Mills wrote:
> I know the service bureau in question. They recently moved. I have sent
> your information to my contact there.
>
>
Ok thanks for all the questions and tips. If no one recognizes the logo I
may just have to abandon the question.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:40 AM Jeremy Nicoll
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 14:25, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> > Using a 3270 emulator get a never ending 'connecting'. That is my
>
I know the service bureau in question. They recently moved. I have sent your
information to my contact there.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Stan Saraczewski
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 6:26 AM
To:
Yes hence the request for contact info.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:56 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> I assume that you mean a TN3270 client. Is it possible that they've moved
> their TN3270 server?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
I assume that you mean a TN3270 client. Is it possible that they've moved their
TN3270 server?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Stan Saraczewski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 14:25, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> Using a 3270 emulator get a never ending 'connecting'. That is my
> description of 'unreachable'.
Do you know if your client was likely to have had some sort of
official arrangement with some site with a real machine etc, or
could this be
You might try a whois on the domain name, although that may not help.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Stan Saraczewski [stansaraczew...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Using a 3270 emulator get a never ending 'connecting'. That is my
description of 'unreachable'.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:16 AM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> Unreachable or the credentials do not work?
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:31:30 -0800 Stan Saraczewski
> wrote:
>
> :>The host where my client
Searching for the info is in progress now.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:21 AM Jeremy Nicoll
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 13:44, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> > The owner recently is deceased and his wife does not know. Yes an IP addr
> > but that is pretty useless using WHOIS.
>
> At least you
It took my previous company two tries, and the last try was complete in the
sixth year of a two year project.
David
-Original Message-
From: John McKown
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 8:05 am
Subject: Re: LISTCAT output information in XML or JSON
Thanks.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 13:44, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> The owner recently is deceased and his wife does not know. Yes an IP addr
> but that is pretty useless using WHOIS.
At least you should know the country involved, though.
How about however payment was made? Surely there's an account
Unreachable or the credentials do not work?
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:31:30 -0800 Stan Saraczewski
wrote:
:>The host where my client has rented time and stored software is now
:>unreachable. Used to get a standard VTAM large logo proclaiming MTI-1 and a
:>list of apps below, like CICS and TSO to
Wow. I am trying to figure this out.
In general, I would expect that File-Aid wants the program calling
data-masking to be compiled at amode31, which should be pretty much all modern
compilers, especially those LE enabled.
The "remote" user is a fly in the ointment. I don't see why remote should
Yes, AT+T. Not sure if they would share customer info.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:43 AM Itschak Mugzach <
0305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Do you have an ip address? Who own it?
>
> בתאריך יום ו׳, 12 במרץ 2021, 15:32, מאת Stan Saraczewski <
> stansaraczew...@gmail.com>:
The owner recently is deceased and his wife does not know. Yes an IP addr
but that is pretty useless using WHOIS.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:42 AM Jeremy Nicoll
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 13:31, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> > The host where my client has rented time and stored software is now
Do you have an ip address? Who own it?
בתאריך יום ו׳, 12 במרץ 2021, 15:32, מאת Stan Saraczewski <
stansaraczew...@gmail.com>:
> The host where my client has rented time and stored software is now
> unreachable. Used to get a standard VTAM large logo proclaiming MTI-1 and a
> list of apps below,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 13:31, Stan Saraczewski wrote:
> The host where my client has rented time and stored software is now
> unreachable. Used to get a standard VTAM large logo proclaiming MTI-1 and a
> list of apps below, like CICS and TSO to select from.
>
> Can anyone provide contact info or
The host where my client has rented time and stored software is now
unreachable. Used to get a standard VTAM large logo proclaiming MTI-1 and a
list of apps below, like CICS and TSO to select from.
Can anyone provide contact info or at least the name of the company ?
Like several others we use JCLCHECK from Broadcom/CA. We were using JCLSCAN,
but we had a new requirement that we be able to check JCL intended to run on a
different sysplex. (We create our production JCL on a test sysplex.) JCLCHECK
has a feature that does this.
37 matches
Mail list logo
