On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:33:05 -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
>
>>1. Is there a better forum for this question ?
>>2. If not...
>>
>1. EBCDIC
>2. MODE B
>
>The client (assuming you haven't turned it off with the "sendsite" command)
>will provide or discover the LRECL and RECFM of the file
The first job can do one pass of the input to split the output into three files
of 250 IDs each. Then run three subsequent jobs concurrently to split the first
step output files into the individual files. That is one less pass on the total
input.
If there is enough TIOT space, an additional
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:23:34 -0500, Hank Oerlemans
wrote:
>1. Is there a better forum for this question ?
>2. If not...
>
>I have worked out that FTP on z/VM needs a couple of extra commands to a FIXED
>LRECL=1024 up to z/OS with the same number of records for a binary transfer.
>XMIT back
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the-brazen-airport-computer-theft-that-has-australias-anti-terror-fighters-up-in-arms-20030905-gdhc5q.html
2 mainframes. Convinced that lots of important files were stolen.
Since most computers (but not most mainframes) have internal file
storage.
On Sat, Jun 11,
Hi
We moved from CA1 to Control-M a few years ago, and then to DFSMSrmm a few
years after that move. The first move was due to CA pricing, the second one
was due to outsourcing policy.
Between those three, I would say that rmm has an unfriendly user interface,
but I suppose that is just the IBM
And it had the ability to take a PDS and transfer all the members to
individual files on the target (Windows) with EBCDIC to ASCII
translation in one transfer request.
Michael
At 08:47 AM 6/11/2022, Don Leahy wrote:
I won't miss the GUI interface that WSA provides. I will miss the
Yeah for as funny as that sounds about taking off of an entire unit I seem
to remember a post some years ago with somebody rolling off a disc and
mainframe out of an Australian data center maybe?
Rob
On Tue, May 10, 2022, 01:58 Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Echoing some other comments, there’s
I agree with one of the other posters that this is most likely due to the
fact that you either have too many extents or too many eligible volumes for
the data sets.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 14:36 Farley, Peter x23353 <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> The simple solution
The simple solution is to split the single job into multiple jobs. As a start,
put the first 250 into JOB1, the second 250 into JOB2 and the last 250 into
JOB3.
It means 3 passes of the input file instead of one, but the jobs will run and
you will get the result you need.
HTH
Peter
You could do it with a small assembler or cobol program with dynamic allocation
dependent on your data.
Bin unterwegs hab nur iPhone zur Verfügung.
> Am 11.06.2022 um 06:39 schrieb Michael Oujesky :
>
> Failing in allocation. Going to have to use fewer output files in a single
> step.
>
>
I guess I should have tried other WSA facilities, but once I saw the GUI
editor I didn't like it and I never bothered with anything else.
I used to regularly print a page of large font that could be read across
the operations room showing res pack volsers for each LPAR. That data
was
Hello -
We're experiencing a lot of problems right now with the VTS, and the 3592-JC
media. Our configuration is:
IBM 3584 tape library, with 3957VEC TS7760-T VTS (virtual tape server),
microcode level 8.51.2.12
10 3592-E08 drives for the VTS back-end, installed 5/25/2022
3592-JC media, bought
I won’t miss the GUI interface that WSA provides. I will miss the
FILEXFER ISPF service. It makes it easy to incorporate file transfers
into your ISPF dialog applications and to initiate transfers from batch
jobs.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 09:30 Steve Smith wrote:
> I experimented with WSA
I experimented with WSA back in the day; didn't find it especially
compelling, best I can recall. I've lately been experimenting with the
ISPF plugin for z/OSMF. If you like a more pointy-clicky interface, you
might like it. I presume whatever customization done with WSA would not
apply.
I have
>> we are getting the message STEPBB - TASK I/O TABLE EXCEEDS TIOT LIMIT OF
>> 0064K STEPBB - STEP WAS NOT EXECUTED.
Ron,
Are your output files writing to a tape? If you are writing to DASD then you
shouldn't have any issue. Your shop seems to have TIOT limit of 64 which should
allow 3273
but I would have thought specifying JOBNAME would be enough to avoid the
situation
An understandable, but incorrect/incomplete, thought.
The implementation covers such cases as where a program in address space A PC's
to address space B and it is within address space B that the system found
16 matches
Mail list logo
