Rackspace has historically had reputation issues and has found itself on
anti-abuse block lists. It would be advisable to check whether any of your
Rackspace IP addresses are listed.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Boesel Guillaume
The devil is in the details. What sort of security controls will IBM have for
Python scripts in Netview?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Horein
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 5:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Re: scripting: Not yet?
https://ibm-z-software-portal.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZNETVIEW-I-42
I am not the author of the idea, but I will certainly vote for it next time
I'm logged on.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:40 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Doesn't NETVIEW run multiple users in the same address
Try putting a line like
numeric digits 20
somewhere before your first use of the storage function.
Some of the storage function calculations need more than the default 9 digits'
precision, depending on address values and memory contents.
I've had inconsistent results when I've forgotten to set
Doesn't NETVIEW run multiple users in the same address space? Can you write
NETVIEW scripts in anything other than CLIST and REXX?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
Hi,
That was on a LINK provided by Sebastian Welton (thank you Sebastian):
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/z-netview/6.2.0?topic=overview-netview-restrictions-rexx-functions
Regards,
Jack
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:58, Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:31:37 +, Jack Zukt wrote:
>
>The glitch was the NETVIEW REXXSTRF value thas was set to the default
>DISABLE. While we wait for an IPL, the OVERRIDE solves the issue.
>
Please describe OVERRIDE. Is that a parameter to NETVIEW?
Star Trek trope:
"Computer, access data
Tested examples are good. I sent an RCF, but didn't suggest examples. Also, it
might be good to bold "hexadecimal" in the parameter description.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
z/OS 2.5 TSO/E REXX Reference, SA32-0972-50, should note that the STORAGE
function is sometimes disabled, e.g. in NETVIEW with REXXSTRF=DISABLE.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I missed this posting so I am replying late.
Yes, I have turned on PREINIT, POSTINIT, PASSWORD and PASSPHRASE.
I've driven PREINIT and POSTINIT functions.
The pointer to the password is supplied.
The pointer to the passphrase is never supplied.
When is the pointer to the passphrase supplied for
It's clear enough; maybe too clear.
But, the last sentence isn't correct; the lower half of a binary field is
neither signed nor unsigned (although I presume you meant "regarded as
unsigned"), it's just a broken-off piece with no meaning at all. Special
case of the absolute value being less than
Hello all,
The glitch was the NETVIEW REXXSTRF value thas was set to the default
DISABLE. While we wait for an IPL, the OVERRIDE solves the issue.
And as Kulosu noted, it is Mark Zelden's IPLINFO rexx that we are using,
not an IBM supplied one.
Thank you all for your time and valuable
Yes, ElementName is in format: LPARname:CSS:CHP, i.e. LPAR1:0:A1
And indeed - PortNumber is just decimal value of CHPID (note: I don't
have LPARs in CSS >0).
However the following command:
cimcli enumerateinstances cim_fcport ...
shows both: IBMzOS_FCPort and IBMzOS_FCCUPort.
While FCPort looks
Hi all
We want to do some testing for MIH and DASD Long Busing. Is there any way to
reserve a primer DASD or a secondary DASD?
Any suggestions are highly appreciated!
Thanks a lot!
Jason Cai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
14 matches
Mail list logo
