Thanks, Sam.
But it's 2023. Can't the "articles" folder (also) contain a single ZIP file, so
that all the contents can be downloaded in one file? Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
In addition to RACF, there is a layer of security rules refresh within OPSMVS
itself.
Don't know the specifics of it, but the OPS/MVS docs will surely cover it.
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 4:53 AM, Shawn Prenevost
wrote:
> Another consideration
Ditto!
On 2/22/2023 5:20 PM, Steve Horein wrote:
Thank you for this and everything else you do!
It is truly appreciated.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:45 PM Sam Golob wrote:
Dear Folks,
Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on
the CBT Tape Web Site
Thank you for this and everything else you do!
It is truly appreciated.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:45 PM Sam Golob wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on
> the CBT Tape Web Site (www.cbttape.org) to their own directory. The CBT
> Tape
In a past life, I used the MXg REXXWLM to convert the old and new
policy definitions to SAS data bases and compared the two,
Another is to just print the old and new and Super-C the two.
Michael
At 05:50 AM 2/22/2023, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to compare two WLM Service
Hi Brian,
"... Originally ..." maybe 30 or more years ago?
(Incidentally, I started with SMP4 (before 1983). I don't remember any
ISPF Panels for that.)
I do RACF in Batch so that it (almost) self-documents and is repeatable.
ISPF Panels are not (easily) repeatable.
Regards,
David
On
I never really thought about it. I use the ISPF panels (for racf and smp/e) a
lot, and I know pretty much all of the commands to do it otherwise. Actually,
I think I built my SMPe jobs originally from the panels. :)
Brian
--
Dear Folks,
Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on
the CBT Tape Web Site (www.cbttape.org) to their own directory. The CBT
Tape home page has been changed to reflect this.
To find my articles now, please go to www.cbttape.org/articles .
There are about
Another consideration is that OPS/MVS can also be configured to make SAF
calls for specific access. This can be all SAF or a mix of SAF and OPS )SEC
rules.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 11:25 AM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Thanks Bill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
They are looking at the problem. It appears one of their MX
records is bad.
They made a change and now my email gets to the list server.
Steve Thompson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
An offline email I received also pointed me to this IBM documentation portal:
https://www.ibm.com/resources/publications
Where search term "VS PASCAL" gets you to all but one of the program product VS
Pascal manuals (the licensed material manual "VS PASCAL DIAGNOSIS GUIDE AND
REFERENCE" is
Thanks Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of William J Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: OPS/MVS
It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I
It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I was, there was a
security environment built with OPS Rules. It was based upon the userid of
the requestor and was set to allow or disallow functions with OPS/MVS.
I think the rules dataset we used ended in 'security.rules'.
We would
> the assumption that soneone starting work
> at a new site could expect to bring their
> own tools with them, with impunity.
I can, because I ask for permission. Doing it when you know it's not allowed,
OTOH, is, shall we say, ill considered.
From: IBM
I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone.
So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY.
What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid
From: Beaver, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM
Subject: OPS/MVS
Current OPSVIEW
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023, at 23:27, Beverly Caldwell wrote:
> I would answer your questions if knew who you were and why you were asking!
> But yes it has never been a problem for me. Sometimes takes a little
> deviousness to make the transfer work. These people think they are
> so smart but there is
Dear Folks,
Recently I received a request to put my (over 230) articles about
MVS Systems Programming, directly online. They had previously resided
(and still reside) on CBT Tape Files 014 and 120, which are in zipped
XMIT-format, and therefore they are not so readily accessible. So I
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/listing-wlm-couple-policy-definitions
Then use diff
Colin
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 11:51, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions?
>
> Thanks
>
> Gadi
>
>
Hi,
Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions?
Thanks
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
19 matches
Mail list logo
