Running a Coupling Facility using a CP for a test Parallel Sysplex 0 anyh gotcha's?

2023-03-03 Thread Laurence Chiu
The situation. We share a couple of Z13's with another (larger client). Z13 B is where we run our development LPARs and Z13 A is production. For critical business reasons an online application on our production LPAR needs to be highly available and that means in a parallel sysplex. But our

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 4 Mar 2023 00:59:55 -, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote: >I think you may be at the point where you need to ditch the LMCOPY interface >and directly invoke IEBCOPY. > Good idea, since IEBCOPY can SELECT a pattern and/or a list of members and will perform the operation in a single CALL.

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
I think you may be at the point where you need to ditch the LMCOPY interface and directly invoke IEBCOPY. Lennie -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Cameron Conacher Sent: 03 March 2023 20:27 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: One more REXX

Re: BookManager

2023-03-03 Thread Roger Bolan
The BookManager format (on z/OS at least) is a special output format from the DCF (Document Composition Facility) SCRIPT command. With OS/390 Softcopy Print you could print from the BookManager books but I never thought the results were really great. If you have the original source text which

Re: Virtual Storage Manager - LDA.

2023-03-03 Thread Seymour J Metz
We are in violent agreement. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Steve Smith Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Virtual Storage Manager - LDA. If you'd stick to the heap, which is much more

Re: Virtual Storage Manager - LDA.

2023-03-03 Thread David Crayford
On 4/3/23 05:45, Steve Smith wrote: If you'd stick to the heap, which is much more efficient, you can request storage usage reports with quite a bit of detail. +1. And if you can also diagnose the heap using tools like Fault Analyzer and good old IPCS. sas On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:37 PM

Re: Virtual Storage Manager - LDA.

2023-03-03 Thread Steve Smith
If you'd stick to the heap, which is much more efficient, you can request storage usage reports with quite a bit of detail. sas On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:37 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > I doubt that you will get what you need that way. PL/I subaloocates > storage withing big blocks, and doing

Re: BookManager

2023-03-03 Thread Dave Wade
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:59:09 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote: >What is the preferred way to convert BookMgr books to PDF? > >My customer has some home-written BookMgr books, which they cannot access >after the z/OS migration (BookMgr support was dropped with z/OS 2.4). > >We managed to transfer the

Re: Mainframe REXX (Re: Badmouthing Rexx and ooRexx - again (Re: zOSMF and zOWE for non-mainframers

2023-03-03 Thread David Crayford
On 3/3/23 22:33, Sebastian Welton wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 06:57:01 -0600, Jay Maynard wrote: I haven't tried to write anything in Rexx, let alone a TCP server. I'd probably be inclined to use Go for that, though. Start here and it is reasonably simple: - TCPIP.SEZAINST(RSSERVER) -

Re: Z15 EOM

2023-03-03 Thread John McKown
Next is z2024-08, if it's GA in August 2024. On Friday, March 3, 2023, Radoslaw Skorupka < 0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Well, nomenclature change is the only constant thing. > We had z900 and z800 > Then we had z990 and z890 > Then we had z9-109 and we expected z8...

Re: Virtual Storage Manager - LDA.

2023-03-03 Thread Seymour J Metz
I doubt that you will get what you need that way. PL/I subaloocates storage withing big blocks, and doing your own GETMAIN/STORAGE instead of using native PL/I support may make matters worse. MVS also suballocates storage, and I know of no GUPI to run the chains with proper serialization and

Re: zOSMF

2023-03-03 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
Agreed. However my explanation is a little bit different. I know ISPF, JCL, etc. However I also know GUI. It can be old fashioned Windows GUI, different OS/2 GUI, modern and less productive "current Windows" GUI, Linux GUI, etc. What I don't like is zOSMF setup and customization. It's horrible.

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Cameron Conacher
Thanks for the suggestion. That did not work either, …….Cameron From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 11:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: One more REXX Question So try isplog do ddname=syspront בתאריך יום ו׳, 3

Virtual Storage Manager - LDA.

2023-03-03 Thread Massimo Biancucci
Hi everybody, I've a PLI program who does ALLOCATE and FREE of some based areas in order to build and manage a dynamic tree. I'm debugging a problem where it runs out of memory. To control how much memory it's using I refer to LDA. To be sure I changed the ALLOC and FREE with explicit (via a ASM

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Dana Mitchell
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 13:06:47 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >1141 $ date; nslookup eccgw.eastdata.ibm.com >Fri Mar 3 11:35:00 MST 2023 >Non-authoritative answer: >Name: eccgw.eastdata.ibm.com >Address: 170.225.123.67 >1142 $ > >... so apparently both hostnames are now

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:24:54 +, Kurt J. Quackenbush wrote: >SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER users, take note of the planned IBM order server IP >address changes on March 23. >https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6856445 > Thanks. Testing a minimal sample from that page: 1140 $ date; nslookup

Re: [nomenclature] Re: Z15 EOM

2023-03-03 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
Well, nomenclature change is the only constant thing. We had z900 and z800 Then we had z990 and z890 Then we had z9-109 and we expected z8... but they announced z9BC and renamed z9-109 to z9EC. Then we had z10EC and z10BC So we expected z11, but we got z196. And z114. They clarified it is 1

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Doug Henry
Hi Curt, Thanks we are using that IP address since the change. Maybe it is just some problem with Bouder's site. Thanks. Doug Regarding testcase.boulder.ibm.com, I thought the IP address changed last year: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6587781 > I know this is not your area but when

Re: Mainframe REXX (Re: Badmouthing Rexx and ooRexx - again (Re: zOSMF and zOWE for non-mainframers

2023-03-03 Thread Jay Maynard
Oh, you can bet I'll tell the world what I think...not like I'm exactly shy, now am i? :-) On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 10:14 AM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 3/3/2023 3:53 AM, Jay Maynard wrote: > > I am assured they are working on a replacement, but I have no details. > > When you do get the details, please

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Kurt J. Quackenbush
Regarding testcase.boulder.ibm.com, I thought the IP address changed last year: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6587781 > I know this is not your area but when sending to Testcase today with z/OSMF > failed because we don't have this in are firewall. I didn't see any > notification for

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Doug Henry
Hi Kurt, I know this is not your area but when sending to Testcase today with z/OSMF failed because we don't have this in are firewall. I didn't see any notification for this. testcase.boulder.ibm.com > Connecting to: testcase-yellow.southdata.ibm.com 170.225.126.22 port: 21.: Doug On

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
@peter - my testing was done in batch  Here is the jcl that I used if that helps: //LBDYCKXX JOB LBD,'LIONEL',REGION=0M,NOTIFY= //OUT OUTPUT DEFAULT=YES,JESDS=ALL,OUTDISP=(HOLD,HOLD) //ISPF EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1B,DYNAMNBR=50 //SYSEXEC DD

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Farley, Peter
I do not believe that when LMCOPY calls IEBCOPY under the covers that it wants or intends to use ISPLOG for print output - I believe it is allocating new "print" files unconditionally like TRANSMIT does and passing the new DD names to IEBCOPY to use for the IEBCOPY SYSPRINT output. I could be

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Itschak Mugzach
So try isplog do ddname=syspront בתאריך יום ו׳, 3 במרץ 2023 ב-17:29 מאת Cameron Conacher < 03cfc59146bb-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>: > Hello Lance, > I allocated a dataset and then included my new dataset name with the DD > statement ISPLOG (DISP=MOD), but IEBCOPY still generates its own

Re: Mainframe REXX (Re: Badmouthing Rexx and ooRexx - again (Re: zOSMF and zOWE for non-mainframers

2023-03-03 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 3/3/2023 3:53 AM, Jay Maynard wrote: I am assured they are working on a replacement, but I have no details. When you do get the details, please post your reactions here on IBM-MAIN. For the record, I predict you won't like it... but one never knows... -- Phoenix Software International

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:29:55 +, Farley, Peter wrote: >I don't know about LMCOPY, but my experience with TRANSMIT is similar. >Running a batch IKJEFT01 with a SYSPRINT DD in the JCL allocated to SYSOUT=* >and executing multiple TRANSMIT commands in SYSTSIN you still get SYS3, >SYS4,

Re: ISPF List

2023-03-03 Thread Bill Hitefield
Didn't know about it until I saw Jeremy's post. I signed up too. Bill Hitefield Dino-Software Corporation 800.480.DINO www.dino-software.com > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Farley, Peter > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2023 10:22 AM > To:

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Cameron Conacher
Much appreciated Lionel. I will keep investigating and share whatever I may find. Thanks …….Cameron From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 10:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: One more REXX Question I've no idea

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
I've no idea what to suggest on a resolution. If you have the ability, you could open a ticket with IBM to ask them. The ISPF support team is terrific. Lionel B. Dyck <>< Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com Github: https://github.com/lbdyck “Worry more about your character than your

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Farley, Peter
I don't know about LMCOPY, but my experience with TRANSMIT is similar. Running a batch IKJEFT01 with a SYSPRINT DD in the JCL allocated to SYSOUT=* and executing multiple TRANSMIT commands in SYSTSIN you still get SYS3, SYS4, etc., outputs in the batch job, one for each TRANSMIT

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Cameron Conacher
Hello Lance, I allocated a dataset and then included my new dataset name with the DD statement ISPLOG (DISP=MOD), but IEBCOPY still generates its own files and nothing is written to the ISPLOG file specified by the DD statement. Thanks …….Cameron From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On

Re: ISPF List

2023-03-03 Thread Farley, Peter
Ditto. I still get the occasional ISPF-L message, though I haven't posted there in a while myself. I just saw Steve's test post to the list this morning. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeremy Nicoll Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 8:57 AM To:

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
Just alloc dd ISPLOG to the dataset you want with a DISP=MOD That should do it Lionel B. Dyck <>< Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com Github: https://github.com/lbdyck “Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you are, reputation merely what others think you

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Cameron Conacher
Hello Lionel, I am assuming that dataset LBDYCK.SPFLOG1.LIST contain the IEBCOPY output log information? And that this file was automatically allocated when your Batch JOB ran. (You did not pre-allocate before running the JOB). I want to try to use my own dataset name for this. Something like:

Re: zOSMF

2023-03-03 Thread Colin Paice
1. z/OSMF supports REST API - so I can call it from off platform automation - and use the same techniques for all platforms they support 2. ISPF dialogs and saving state and workflow management etc have some limitations. z/OSMF fixes some of these 3. We've gone away from Silos,

Re: Mainframe REXX (Re: Badmouthing Rexx and ooRexx - again (Re: zOSMF and zOWE for non-mainframers

2023-03-03 Thread Sebastian Welton
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 06:57:01 -0600, Jay Maynard wrote: >I haven't tried to write anything in Rexx, let alone a TCP server. I'd >probably be inclined to use Go for that, though. > Start here and it is reasonably simple: - TCPIP.SEZAINST(RSSERVER) - TCPIP.SEZAINST(R6SERVER) Sebastian

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
In my simple test I don't see any sysout. in = 'lbdyck.test.pds' out = 'lbdyck.test.pdse' Address ISPexec "lminit dataid(indd1) dataset('"in"')" "lminit dataid(outdd1) dataset('"out"')" "lmcopy

Re: zOSMF

2023-03-03 Thread Harris Randy - Nashville
I'm sure my complaints don't do any good, but I've been doing this for 25 years (I know many of you a lot longer). I don't understand why IBM wants to force everyone to use z/OSMF. Maybe it's an attempt to attract a younger group of System Programmers. That's fine. However, I am not a GUI fan. I

Re: One more REXX Question

2023-03-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:40:18 +0200, ITschak Mugzach wrote: >Allocate syspront as MOD instead of share and all outputs will be written >to same file (do not free and allocate syspront every call) > Does the description of LMCOPY in the ISPF Services Guide,SC19-3626-50, mention the use of SYSPRONT

Re: ISPF List

2023-03-03 Thread Jeremy Nicoll
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023, at 13:50, Steve Thompson wrote: > ND stopped supporting ISPF List. Anyone know where it went or if > it still exists? I've seen traffic on it in mid-Feb 2023. According to headers in the mails: List-Subscribe:

ISPF List

2023-03-03 Thread Steve Thompson
ND stopped supporting ISPF List. Anyone know where it went or if it still exists? Steve Thompson -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO

Re: how to determine if new DB2 ERLY code is in memory

2023-03-03 Thread Mark Jacobs
It should give some information when the subsystem is initialized, I.E. when IEFSSNxx is processed. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com --- Original Message --- On

Re: how to determine if new DB2 ERLY code is in memory

2023-03-03 Thread Bill Giannelli
sorry for the stupid question, but where in the SYSLOG? Does it give you module sizes? How can you tell the "version" of the SDSNLINK load modules? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER server IP address changes

2023-03-03 Thread Kurt J. Quackenbush
Sure, I'll post up here after I get notified the server IP address migration is complete. > Will there be more announcements, saying the new IPs and DNS entries are in > place and when the old ones will be shut off? >> SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER users, take note of the planned IBM order server IP >>

Re: how to determine if new DB2 ERLY code is in memory

2023-03-03 Thread René Jansen
As I remember it tells you in the SYSLOG. There was once an incident in which we had a slightly older production mainframe. DB2 tested swimmingly on dev, test and acc. But prod missed a couple of new instructions and then I found out only one copy of the ERLY code is loaded. You could use

Re: Ransomware in VSAM and DB2

2023-03-03 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 10:27:20 +0800 Tommy Tsui wrote: :>Hi all. :>We are studying to build the tertiary backup. In fact, is it possible to :>hack the VSAM dataset during online period, is there any policy to protect :>VSAM datasets ? VSAM is simply a file. Standard file protections apply. If you

how to determine if new DB2 ERLY code is in memory

2023-03-03 Thread Bill Giannelli
How do I determine what version of DB2 ERLY code modules are actually loaded in memory, not just copied into the libraries? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: Mainframe REXX (Re: Badmouthing Rexx and ooRexx - again (Re: zOSMF and zOWE for non-mainframers

2023-03-03 Thread Jay Maynard
I have a zD (as it got called). IBM wasn't prepared to deal with the response they got, and they also are simply not set up to deal with selling to individuals. On top of that, the technology they're using for licensing is getting long in the tooth, and they are not going to be able to use it