CBS's "60 Minutes": Quantum Computing

If you’d like to understand why IBM is so bullish on quantum computing — and so focused on quantum-safe cryptography — this “60 Minutes” story is well worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4ssT6Dzmnw — Timothy Sipples Senior Architect Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and

Re: Assembler programmer wanted

You are a person.  People have rights, objects do not.    The company can require that you assign them the rights to any invention created using the things they paid for - computers, software, offices, books.   Training/experience is more of a gray area in my mind. Note that software used to

Re: Assembler programmer wanted

Funny how the industry's most associated with “intellectual property” and residuals are some of the least intellectual. IT workers should have unionized 50 years ago and could have gotten a “piece of a very large pie”. Deservedly so. It would have included engineers, computer scientists,

Re: zOSMF install

Classification: Confidential Short answer. Yes. Do it now. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: zOSMF install [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the

Re: Assembler programmer wanted

Correcting an error or writing an enhancement *does* generate revenue, directly or indirectly, by helping to acquire or retain users. Asking for a piece of the pie is always reasonable, as is refusing the request. It's a matter of finding terms that both sides can agree on. In practice I

Re: zOSMF install

Hi Kurt, Thank you. That is exactly the answer I needed. We installed 2.4 with a ServerPac and as I am just starting down the implementation path of zOSMF, my manager asked me to find out if we should try to get the 3.1 zOSMF stand-alone and install that first. Your response confirmed that

Re: zOSMF install

> I know I need zOSMF to install 3.1. My question is, in essence, can (or > should) I order and install a stand-alone zOSMF 3.1 and use that for my z/OS > 3.1 install or am I better off (or is this the only option) installing zOSMF > 2.4 before even heading down the 3.1 path? Did you install

Re: zOSMF install

Hi Richard, I know I need zOSMF to install 3.1. My question is, in essence, can (or should) I order and install a stand-alone zOSMF 3.1 and use that for my z/OS 3.1 install or am I better off (or is this the only option) installing zOSMF 2.4 before even heading down the 3.1 path? Thanks

Re: zOSMF install

You need zOSMF to install 3.1. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] : zOSMF install Hi all, Just looking for opinions on this. Scenario is we're

zOSMF install

Hi all, Just looking for opinions on this. Scenario is we're running z/OS 2.4. We don't have zOSMF installed. Sometime next year we're going to migrate to 3.1. Would we be better off installing/implementing zOSMF 2.4 today in preparation for installing 3.1 or should we install zOSMF 3.1

Re: Assembler programmer wanted

Ok, now you've got me curious. While I'm employed by a California software company, I ~am~ a company resource, am I not? How is the law worded to bypass that (so to speak)? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* A tart temper never mellows with age, and a sharp tongue

Re: Non system LX value

You need an authorized routine that can run in the client address space to issue the ATSET. On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:19:38 -0500 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>Hi :> :>I have been looking over syncrounes cross memory or PC rtn’s :> :>What I seem to be missing is where you want to make that service

Re: Assembler programmer wanted

I think this is a bad analogy.   The guy who installs or fixes an item that does not actually generate revenue certainly can ask for residuals - but there aren't any since there is no income from it. However, if residuals is a thing (which it is in some industries) then asking for a piece of

Re: IEF211I - DATA SET RESERVATION UNSUCCESSFUL on relative GDG

This was actually kind of fun to dig into... I knew a lot of what was going on here, but I had to try it out myself to put all of the puzzle pieces together. I'm far from being an expert on ENQ, so I don't know all of the reasons why ENQ upgrade behaves the way it does. But deadlocks are at

Non system LX value

Hi I have been looking over syncrounes cross memory or PC rtn’s What I seem to be missing is where you want to make that service available to certain address spaces So you code on the LXRES SYSTEM=NO But I don’t see any where where you specify an asid indicating what address space you

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

Peter The latest APAR for the new sample and REXX is : PH55420 Included is a starter set sequence of RACF commands to implement a simple SDSF security setup assuming three types of users : sysprogs, operators and general users. Also included is a REXX exec that takes SDSF “NTBL/NTBLENT”