I am attempting to mount my target datasets in /SERVICE directory to apply
maintenance. I am having diffaculty mounting the CIM zFS file into
/SERVICE/var/webm - my /var is a SYM to /SYSTEM.. if i direct my mount to
/SERVICE/SYSTEM/var/webm, i get an error : BPXF135E rc81.. if i create a new
Thank David,
I was attempting to create a separate directory/mountpoint and mount my target
version to the new location.. which is when i get the 79 EINVAL, which refers
to a root of an already mounted file system.. doesnt seem to like anything i
attempt. Never thought about making a copy of
1.13 was installed by someone else.. so i'm playing catch up. I attempted to
mount at /SERVICE/var/wbem at first that's when i received the rc81.. so i
tried other locations.. that's the rc79.. thought about the copy to other zfs..
may have a problem there too, it won't be mounted in the
Got it Scott... Thanks for the help
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks to all for the input..
The solution, whether right or not... REPRO the OCDS and MCDS to a flat file..
edit them and change the 3490 device type to my VTAPE esoteric.. del/def the
CDS's and REPRO back in..
I am holding RECYCLE and other automatic processes until I can get the vendor
to
and to be mounted on the older drive...?
Just looking for some quick assistance, I have the vendor researching too, but
the more eyes the better...
Thanks,
Brett Danals
Sr. Systems Programmer
Hastings Mutual Insurance Co.
--
For IBM
Thank you for the reply..
I do have the USERUNITTABLE defined for my esoteric. My Virtual is defined as a
9484 and HSM does not recognize that.
I'm not having a problem with remembering the drive.. the oddest thing is, that
we haven't used these tape drives for HSM since the late 90's. There
Ahh ha! I think you are onto something.. We are not managing tape datasets,
but I started looking at routines and it looks like it verifies the device to
decide if it needs managed... I did not add my virtual tape esoteric
I'll do that straight away and update when done...
Thanks!!!
Uhm.. well . that didn't work..
I have entries to test the device and it would set the storage class to '', in
a sense it would bypass SMS routines.
Back to square one
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
