Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

;So, just to close the loop...do we correctly document the required options? > >ESHEL Jonathan wrote: >> Thank you John. The problem was found thanks to Tony H. as a wrong HLASM >> compile option used by us - COMPAT(SYSLIST). >> >> Regards, Jonathan >> >>

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

I was about to before I saw Tony H.'s message with the solution ... Thank you Ed for you help. Jonathan On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:47:15 -0600, Ed Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> wrote: >On Mar 8, 2016, at 10:37 AM, ESHEL Jonathan wrote: > >> Thank you Allan and sorry for not

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

>causing the problem somehow, I suggest you open a PMR with JES2 Level 2 >(COMPID 5752SC1BH). Our PTFs should be installable without error (once >you include any PE fixing PTFs, of course) whether you use source and >soruce update installation (i.e., ++SRC & ++SRCUPD) or not (i.e., ++MOD)

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

NOCOMPAT to our SMP/E ASM options, and the PTF got applied without a problem. We were indeed doing something weird ... Thank you for your help, Jonathan On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:18:19 -0500, Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.net> wrote: >On 8 March 2016 at 12:03, ESHEL Jonathan <j.e

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

nes having this problem, we must be doing something very weird ... Regards, Jonathan -Message d'origine- De : John Eells [mailto:ee...@us.ibm.com] Envoyé : mercredi 2 mars 2016 17:14 Objet : Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ? ESHEL Jonathan wrote: > We are trying to apply the PTF's

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

Thank you Allan and sorry for not responding earlier. SMPMTS is the 1st in our SYSLIB concat and it is empty anyway ... Regards, Jonathan -Message d'origine- De : Staller, Allan [mailto:allan.stal...@wunderman.com] Envoyé : mercredi 2 mars 2016 16:37 Objet : Re: Problem applying

Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

We are trying to apply the PTF's that install the new JSON parser support under z/OS 2.1 (as of 2.2 it's integrated into the base system), and have a problem with one of the prereqs - UA71619. It's an assembler error when SMPE is compiling SDSF module ISFJREAD and the usage of the CALL macro

Re: Strange HMC issue

The name it got, BMC_DHCP may provide a hint. Do you have a BMC product such as BMC MainView SecureHMC running somewhere, perhaps being tested ? Jonathan Eshel -Message d'origine- De : Tony Thigpen [mailto:t...@vse2pdf.com] Envoyé : samedi 21 novembre 2015 06:00 Objet : Strange HMC

Re: Strange HMC issue

client? > >Tony Thigpen > >ESHEL Jonathan wrote on 11/23/2015 03:49 AM: >> The name it got, BMC_DHCP may provide a hint. Do you have a BMC product such >> as BMC MainView SecureHMC running somewhere, perhaps being tested ? >> >> Jonathan Eshel >> >> -

JAVA socket timeout exception

Hello everyone, (cross-posting to IBM-MAIN, IBMTCP-L and MVSOE-L) We are experiencing a problem in the current development of a web service application. A request sometimes ends up with a time out exception on both sides. The server is on z/OS, it is a stand-alone server based on

Re: JZOS batch launcher (JVMLDMxx) APF ?

, 2013 at 9:39 AM, ESHEL Jonathan j.es...@rsd.com wrote: Hello list, Has anyone ever tried to use the JZOS batch launcher to launch a chain that needs to be APF authorized ? It was linked (at least the version I am using from JDK 6.0.1) with AC(0) and I wonder if there is an APF authorized

JZOS batch launcher (JVMLDMxx) APF ?

Hello list, Has anyone ever tried to use the JZOS batch launcher to launch a chain that needs to be APF authorized ? It was linked (at least the version I am using from JDK 6.0.1) with AC(0) and I wonder if there is an APF authorized equivalent for it such as BPXBATA2 compared to BPXBATSL ?