I must confess, I learned something quite new here. I didn't realize ISRDDN, B
or E line actions were taking the first 16 extents of the concatenation! Cool.
I must remember to use the LONG command in the future to prevent being
misdirected on my part.
Thanks to all for you're posts and
I've run across something strange. I was modifying an IPCS clist in our in
house CLIST library. Whilst using ISRDDN to locate the correct version I
noticed that library contained quite a few BLS members. When I select
browse from ISRDDN SYSPROC concatenantion I'm actually browsing the
Great memory Mike. After removing leading zeros, WLM is classifying as
expected.
Thank you very much...mystery solved.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
We were advised to move away from TN classification of individual TN's and go
to Transaction Class. I defined 3 new Transaction Class Groups and within I
specified Transacion Class.
Group name . . . . . . . . . : TRANHI
Description . . . . . . . . . High priority
Thanks for catching my typo's...
I do in fact have
machine login myracfuser...and end the macro with quit..not quite.
At any rate I have success!!! I added a blank at the end of each line in
.netrc and made sure the very last line is CRLF.
I'm good to go.
Thanks for pointing me in the right
We want to automate some ftp's on our zlunix machine to our zos host.
I created .netrc like this
machine mymachine.comp.com userid myzosracfid password myzosracfidpw
macdef ftptest
put zlunix.filename 'zos.dataset'
quite
It is my understanding on zlinux .netrc I merely say
Greetings,
We are going to have to change one our SYSPLEX members from MST to CEST. To do
this we will need to convert DFSMSRMM to Common Time Support. I'm just putting
a feeler out there to see if anyone has done this and if so were there any
unexpected issues or was the EDGUTIL utility with
Mike,
Thanks for the post. I don't have TECH QA support. I've asked our IBM rep to
see if they can get the HSM question answered.
Will check into the RMM configurations
Regards,
jeff
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
We are running a 6 member Parallel Sysplex with one additional member sharing
GRSPLEX, OMVSPLEX and HSMPLEX resources only.
Today all systems run with the same TIMEZONE setting (W.07.00.00). In the 6
member full Parallel Sysplex, what are the ramifications with DFSMSHSM
management of SMS