Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?
On 27 October 2015 at 11:17, Mike Schwab wrote:
> The 24*7*365 companies have solved it.
> Versus the 24*7*364.96 companies that haven't.
That 24*7*365 is a pretty large number. What would
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:31:30 +, J O Skip Robinson wrote:
> These so-called Victory Gardens were deemed more manageable by working stiffs
> if there were still some daylight left at the end of the job day.
Yep - this is why we've never done daylight saving.
All that extra sunlight at the end
e.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 11:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:
/26/2015 5:45 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time
conversion?
OP did not state whether GMT is set to UTC or local. I would have thought by
now shops would have converted to UTC. I understand that the hit is much
Rosenberg
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?
At 23:33 + on 10/26/2015, Chris Hoelscher wrote about Re: RE-IPL for the
Daylight to Standard time conversion?:
>We also shutdown for
6-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Day
